Critical Situations and Civil Activism in the Digital Era
Nowadays, a civil society and its volunteers are the active participants of a global political process, especially when it’s going on about current critical situations (natural disasters, technological accidents and so on). Such civil activism is defined by a lack of vital resources, poverty and illnesses, an atmospheric and water pollutions as well as by various forms of social inequality. The essence of current critical situation is produced by the fact that a man is simultaneously became a powerful instrument of catastrophic changes on the planet and a pigmy fully dependent on the informational impulses from the outside and on the growing process of accumulation of the industrial and household wastes. Due to an existence of global information networks a process of shaping of a certain ‘hybrid’ named as a “science-education-practice” is rapidly going on. A multitude of metabolic processes emerging as a result of interaction of qualitatively different essences is its integrating force. The interactions of theses essences are shaping a capability of the individuals to the ecological and other forms of a systemic risk-reflection. For a rapid and relatively painless resolving of any critical situation three preconditions are absolutely necessary: the mutual understanding among the three of the above institutions, an existence of a common platform for a permanent exchange by new ideas and knowledges, and for accumulation of a new experience is necessary.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Abul’khanova-Slavskaya, K. (1980), An Activity and Psychology of a Person, Nauka, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Illich, I. (2006), A Release from the Schools. Proportionality and the Modern World, Prosvescheniye, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Castells, M. (1996), The Information Age. Economy, Society and Culture. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.
Castells, M. (2004), The Internet Galaxy. Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Kitaev-Smyk, L. (1983), A Psychology of the Stress, Nauka, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Kuz’mina, A. (1998), An Ecological Activity as a Form of Reflectivity, in Yanitsky, O. N. (ed.), Russia: The Risks and Threats of “Transition” Society, Publishing House of the Institute of Sociology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 225-36. (In Russian).
Moiseev, N. (1996), Death-Agony of Russia. An Attempt of a Systemic Analysis, Ecopress-3M, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Stepansky, A. (1980), The Tsarist Autocracy and Public Organizations in Russia at the Turn of the XIX-XX Centuries, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Yanitsky, O. (1998), The Chernobyl Catastrophe: An Experience of a Risk Reflection, in Yanitsky, O. N. (ed.), Russia: The Risks and Threats of “Transition” Society, Publishing House of the Institute of Sociology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 36-59. (In Russian).
Yanitsky, O. (2014), “The Volunteers of the State and Civil ones”. Sociological Science and Social Practice, 1 (5): 71-89. (In Russian).
Yanitsky, O. (2017), “A Qualitative model of the besieged city: the case of Aleppo, Syria”, Sociological Science and Social Practice, (1): 129-144. (In Russian).
Barrios, R. E. (2011), Post-Katrina Neighborhood Recovery Planning In New Oeleans, in Dowty, R. A. and Allen, B. L. (eds.), Dynamics of Disaster. Lessons on Risk, Response and Recovery, London, Washington, DC, Earthscan, UK, 97-114.
Deelstra, T. and Yanitsky, O. (1991), Cities of Europe: The Public’s Role in Shaping the Urban Environment, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya Publishing House, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Haberl, H., Fisher-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F. and Winiwater, V. (2016), Society-Nature Relations across Time and Space [Online], available at: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-33326-7 (Accessed 1 November 2019)
Inglehart, M. (1991), Reactions to Critical Life Events. A Social Psychological Analysis, Praeger, New York, USA.
Kaldor, M. (2012), New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Kaldor, M., Anheier, H., and Glasius, M. (2003), Global Civil Society Yearbook, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Stokols, D. (2018), Social Ecology in the Digital Age. Solving Complex Problems in a Globalized World, Academic Press, University of California, USA.
The Global Risk Report (2018), World Economic Forum, Geneva, [Online], available at: www.weforum.risks (Accessed 1 November 2019).
Von Weizsäcker, E. U. and Wijkman, A. (2018), Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population, and the Destruction of the Planet, Springer, New York, USA.
Yanitsky, O. (1993), Russian Environmentalism: Leading Figures, Facts, Opinions, Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya Publishing House, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Yanitsky, O. (2012), “The 2010 Wildfires in Russia. An Eco-Sociological Analysis”, Sociological Studies, 51 (2): 57-75.
This article is funded by the Russian Scientific Fund, grant No 19-78-10052, the project “Emergency volunteering as a reply to the natural and technological challenges in Russia”