Information technology in sacred practice:
the attitude of the clergy and laity to the digitalization of religion
The article is devoted to analyzing the processes of digitalization in the religious sphere and the attitudes of clergy and ordinary believers towards the integration of digital technologies into religious practices, as well as the gradual erosion of the boundaries between the sacred and the profane resulting from the use of artificial intelligence. Using the examples of Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and new cults, it examines such innovations as mobile applications for ritual support, robot monks, AI preachers, virtual churches in metaverses, holographic projects simulating religious authorities, and quasi-religions. The empirical basis consists of informal interviews with clergy and parishioners of Orthodox churches and mosques in Kazan (n=12). It was revealed that attitudes towards technological innovations vary not only between confessions but also within them, revealing a generational divide. Young people are more often willing to accept digital forms of religious interaction, while older age groups insist on the inadmissibility of replacing live communication with clergy with machine algorithms. Special attention is paid to the phenomenon of “dataism” and attempts to create Syntheistic cults (for example, the “Way of the Future” church by E. Levandowski), where artificial intelligence is endowed with the attributes of a deity. The author concludes that the digital transformation of religion leads to contradictory consequences. On the one hand, new opportunities for religious education and interaction open up (such as mobile applications and virtual assistants). On the other hand, the threat of desacralization and the replacement of genuine interpersonal contact with artificial simulation increases, provoking ethical and theological debates about free will, moral responsibility, and the limits of what is permissible in the spiritual sphere.
Guzelbaeva, G. Ya. (2026), “Information technology in sacred practice: the attitude of the clergy and laity to the digitalization of religion”, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 12 (3), 273-288. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2026-12-3-1-7.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Akhmedov, R. M. Eriashvili, N. D., Akhmedov, D. R. (2021), “Digital Religion and traditional cultural and ideological models. Features of the ratios”, Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry`, (3), 25-29, DOI: 10.24411/2312-0444-2021-3-25-29, EDN: GCUKSG. (In Russian)
Besschetnova, E. V. (2026), “The Impact of Digital Transformation on Human Religious Life and Its Critique from the Perspective of Orthodox Anthropology”, RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 30 (1), 243-253, DOI: 10.22363/2313-2302-2026-30-1-243-253, EDN: PZFUOU. (In Russian)
Bogatova, O. A., Golovanov, S. (2023), “The activity of Orthodox bloggers as the factor of the Orthodox religious organizations modernization”, Science. Culture. Society, 29 (2), 91-102, DOI: 10.19181/nko.2023.29.2.8, EDN: GEULXR. (In Russian)
Bogdanova, O. A. (2020), “Mediatization of Pastoral Care in the Russian Orthodox Church: Reasons Behind ‘Ask the Priest’ Websites”, Gosudarstvo, Religiia, Tserkov v Rossii i za Rubezhom, 38 (2), 207-234, DOI: 10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-2-207-234, EDN: TDWVOK. (In Russian)
Brovin, V. V. (2017), “A robot priest has appeared in Germany – and it's a cyberpunk provocation”, Disgusting Men, available at: https://disgustingmen.com/tehno/blessu-2-robot-pastor/?ysclid=mp8cn84w1c101637425 (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
Vasilieva, E. (2026), “In Japan, a robot monk was introduced to replace the shortage of clergy”, RIA Novyi den, available at: https://newdaynews.ru/inworld/870422.html (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
“Holographic AI Jesus Hears Confessions Instead of a Priest in Switzerland” (2024), NaukaTV.RF, available at: https://naukatv.ru/news/v_shvejtsarii_golograficheskij_iiiisus_prinimaet_ispovedi_vmesto_svyaschennika (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
Gallyamov, R. R., Mavlyautdinov, I. S. (2024), “Artificial Intelligence in Religious Discourse: Abrahamic Versions”, Tekhnologos, (4), 48-62, DOI: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2024.4.04, EDN: JRPQMY. (In Russian)
Gibadullina, M. R., Kusanova, D. S. (2022), “New forms of network activism on the example of Muslim women of the Republic of Tatarstan”, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 8 (2), 16-27, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-2-0-2, EDN: OREEUQ. (In Russian)
Guzelbaeva, G. Y. (2016), “Interethnic interactions in the Republic of Tatarstan: The current situation and challenges, Rossiya i musul'manskiy mir, 3 (285), 22-27, EDN: VXVXND. (In Russian)
Guzelbaeva, G.Y. (2024), Digitalization of the religious sphere, trust and attitude towards religious organizations and spiritual leaders in the post-pandemic: voice of youth, Istoricheskaya etnologiya, 9 (3), 620-637, DOI: 10.22378/ he.2024-9-4.620-637, EDN: NMGOHK. (In Russian)
Emelyantseva, M. (2026), “We are drifting away from God: US startup launches paid video calls with AI Jesus”, Men Today, available at: https://www.mentoday.ru/life/news/14-04-2026/my-vse-dalshe-ot-boga-startap-v-ssha-zapustil-platnye-videozvonki-s-ii-iisusom/ (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
Zimova, N. S., Fomin, E. V. (2022), “Transforming the sacred: Digital religious communities in the XXI century”, Sotsiologiya religii v obshhestve pozdnego moderna, (11), 39-47, EDN: FIIOXL. (In Russian)
Kai, O. (2024), “Digital faith: How religious, esoteric, and destructive communities are settling into the metaverse”, Teller, available at: https://teller.media/czifrovaya-vera-kak-religioznye-ezotericheskie-i-destruktivnye-soobshhestva-obzhivayut-metavers/ (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
Lebedev, S. D., Blagoevich M., Shapovalova, L. V. (2023), “Revitalization of religion: Towards an understanding of the perspectives of the modern religious situation”, Sociological Research, (8), 60-75, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2024-10-3-0-4, EDN: FDKHAO. (In Russian)
Markova, N. M. (2024), “Digitalization of religion: Analysis of contemporary theological, philosophical and religious trends”, Gumanitarnye vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, 2 (3), 77-86, DOI: 10.22405/23044772-2024-3-2-77-86, EDN: DEENYJ. (In Russian)
“Mufti Abbyasov: Neural networks do not contradict the norms of Islam” (2024), Obshchestvennaya Sluzhba Novostey, available at: https://www.osnmedia.ru/obshhestvo/muftij-abbyasov-nejroseti-ne-protivorechat-normam-islama/amp (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
“The Mufti of Chechnya warned that artificial intelligence must not be asked questions regarding religion” (2025), GTRK Vainakh, available at: https://gtrkvainah.ru/muftij-chechni-predupredil-chto-iskusstvennomu-intellektu-nelzya-zadavat-voprosy-kasatelno-religii/ (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
Mchedlova, M.M., Kofanova, E.N., Shevchenko, A.G. (2021), “Religion in a pandemic: attitude to the digitalization of religious practices”, Rossiya Reformiruyushchayasya [Academic Writing: Russia in Reform], by Gorshkov M. K. (ed.), Yearbook, Is.19, Novyi Chronograf, Moscow, Russia, 462-483, DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2021.20, EDN: UXGAML. (In Russian)
Nimyaev, E. A. (2023), “Locating religion in the digital communication system: “Space for the community” and digital religious surrogate”, Vestnik Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Imeni A. S. Pushkina, (3), 171-183, DOI: 10.35231/18186653_2023_3_171, EDN: XEEVFS. (In Russian)
Novosaduk, N.I. (2025), “The Russian Orthodox Church and digitalization: New opportunities and moral issues”, Bulletin of the Omsk Orthodox Theological Seminary, 2 (19), 47-54, EDN: RVVNCK. (In Russian)
Ostrovskaya, E. A., Badmatsyrenov, T. B. (2024), “Network technologies as a tool for self-presentation of small religious groups (the case of Buddhism new for Russia)”, Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii, 15 ( 3), 79-106, DOI: 10.19181/vis.2024.15.3.6, EDN: PKBVEW. (In Russian)
“Pope Leo XIV warned priests against using AI in sermons” (2026), Kommersant, available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8462875 (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
Pateev, R. F., Gibadullina, M. R. (2024), “Digitalization processes in religion: Online madrassa (the experience of the Republic of Tatarstan)”, Kazan Digital Week – 2024: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnogo foruma [Kazan Digital Week – 2024: Proceedings of the International Forum], NCBZ, Kazan, Russia, 1181-1185, EDN: LLVCBP. (In Russian)
“Social media must not turn into a digital cage that creates barriers to participation in church life – Patriarch Kirill” (2025), Foma, available at: https://foma.ru/soczseti-ne-dolzhny-prevrashhatsya-v-czifrovuyu-kletku-sozdayushhuyu-pregradu-dlya-uchastiya-v-czerkovnoj-zhizni-patriarh-kirill.html (Accessed 20 April 2026). (In Russian)
Harari, Y. N. (2018), Homo Deus: Kratkaya Istoriya Budushchego [Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow], Translated by Andreev, A., Sinbad, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Chesnova, E. N. (2023), “Religion online: New practices and phenomena”, Gumanitarnye vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, 4 (48), 68-82, EDN: ZZCCVV. (In Russian)
Sharonova, S. A. (2021), “Russian Orthodox Church facing the challenges of digitalization”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 7 (2), 26-39, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2021-7-2-0-3, EDN: PMOOKE. (In Russian)
Atarmizi, W. A. (2025), “Malaysian Roblox community hosts historic virtual World Quran Hour”, SinarDaily, available at: https://www.sinardaily.my/article/717471/focus/national/malaysian-roblox-community-hosts-historic-virtual-world-quranhour (Accessed 20 April 2026).
Berger P. (1999), Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co, Washington, USA, 137.
Beres, D. (2018), “Are AI churches and “tech faith” cults the future of religion?”, BigThink, available at: https://bigthink.com/culture-religion/are-religion-and-artificial-intelligence-compatible/ (Accessed 20 April 2026).
Campbell, H., and Bellar, W. (2023), Digital Religion: The Basics, Routledge, New York, USA.
Campbell, H. (2016), “Framing the human-technology relationship: How Religious Digital Creatives engage posthuman narratives”, Social Compass, 63 (3), 302-318.
Cheong, P. H. (2022), “Authority”, in Campbell, Y., Tsuria, R. (eds.) Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds, Routledge, New York, USA, 87-102.
Goffman E. (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
“Digital Islam and Muslim Millennials: How Social Media Influencers Reimagine Religious Authority and Islamic Practices” / Zaid, B., Fedtke, J., Shin, D., El Kadoussi, A., and Ibahrine, M. (2022), Religions, 13 (335), 1-15, DOI: 10.3390/rel13040335, EDN: BQSSWO.
Jefferson, C. (2021), “Submerged in the virtual: Religious Embodiment in virtual space”, UNC Asheville Journal of Undergraduate Research, 34 (1), 644-655.
Midson, S. (2022), “Posthuman priests: Exploring the ‘New visability of religion’ in robotics re(-)presentation of religious rituals”, Religions, 13 (10), 941. DOI: 10.3390/rel13100941.
“Pope urges respect, honest dialogue in social media networks with new Communications Day message” (2013), United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, available at: https://www.usccb.org/news/2013/pope-urges-respect-honest-dialogue-social-media-networks-new-communications-day-message (Accessed 20 April 2026).
Popovska, D. B. (2025), “If not a religion, then what? Potential state responses to the conundrum of Artificial Intelligence as religion”, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 23 (3), 34-47, DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2025.2531649, EDN: MPXWKN.
Possamai, A. (2018), The I-zation of Society, Religion, and Neoliberal Post-Secularism, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Simmerlein, J. (2024), “Sacred meets synthetic: A multi-method study on the first AI church service”, Review of Religious Research, 67 (1), 126-145, DOI: 10.1177/0034673X241282962, EDN: CPGVJK.