Gender Diversity in Indian society: Identity distinction between Hijra and Transgender
Ethnomethodological explanation of the social construction of gender highlighted the natural attitude of society towards binary gender categories (men-women); gender groups other than men and women are socially and culturally rejected. Gender in everyday life is a kind of displaying appearances and behaviour in the forms of masculinity and femininity. Gender is also described as the performanceof individuals in their everyday life. The binary gender system (men-women) is perceived as normal or socially acceptable because of the “natural attitude” (preconceived notion regarding gender) regarding certain fixed social roles and behaviour of men and women. The paper has examined how the social construction of gender contradicts gender diversity.There are four gender categories in Indian society: Men, women, transgender and third gender (Hijra).It has shown the distinction between transgender and third gender identity in Indian society. Hijra is a native third gender category in India, thatstructurally contradicted the compulsory binary gender system but transgender or transsexuals arein favour of fluidity of sexual orientation or sexual preferences.
Laskar, M. H. (2022), “Gender Diversity in Indian society: Identity distinction between Hijra and Transgender”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 8 (2), 60-72. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-2-0-5
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Benjamin, H. (2006), Transsexualism and Tranvestism as Psycho-Somatic and Somato-Psychic Syndromes. InStryker Susan & Whittle Stephen (Eds), The Transgender Studies Reader, 45-52, Routledge, UK.
Brickell, Ch. (2006), “The Sociological Construction of Gender and Sexuality”. The Sociological Review, 54 (1), 87-113.
Butler, J. (1988), “Performative Acts and Gender Constitutions: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory”, Theatre Journal, 40 (4), 519-531.
Butler, J. (1999), Gender Trouble Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge, UK
Chase, Ch. (2006), Hermaphrodites with Attitude: Mapping the Emergence of Intersex Political Activism. InStryker Susan & Whittle Stephen (Eds.),The Transgender Studies Reader, 300-314, Routledge, UK
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985), Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. Basic Books, US.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993), “The five sexes: Why male and female are not enough”, The Sciences, (March-April), 20-24.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000), Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality, Basic Books, US.
Feinberg, L. (1998), Trans liberation: Beyond pink or blue. Beacon Press, US.
Feinberg, L. (2001), “Trans health crisis: For us it’s life or death”, American Journal of Public Health, 91, 897-900.
Feinberg, L. (2006), Transgender Liberation A Movement Whose Time Has Come. InStryker Susan & Whittle Stephen (Eds.), The Transgender Studies Reader(pp-205-202).Routledge, UK.
Freud, S. (1905), Three contributions to the theory of sex. In A. A. Brill (Eds.), The basic writings of Sigmund Freud, 553-629. Random House, New York.
Hinchy, J. (2013), “Troubling bodies: Eunuchs, masculinity and impotence in colonial North India”, South Asian History and Culture, 4 (2), 196-212.
Hinchy, J. (2017), “The eunuch archive: Colonial records of non-normative gender and sexuality in India”, Culture, Theory and Critique, 1-20.
Howson, Al. (2005). Embodying Gender, Sage Publications Ltd, US.
Kessler, S. J. and McKenna, W. (1978), Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach.University of Chicago Press, US.
Kessler, S. J. and McKenna, W. (1997), “Who put the “trans” in transgender? Gender theory and everyday life”, International Journal of Transgenderism (Special Issues), available at: http://www.symposion.com/ijt/gilbert/kessler.htm (Accessed 10 October 2020).
Kessler, S. J. and McKenna, W. (2000), “Gender Construction in Everyday Life: Transsexualism”, Feminism and Psychology, 10(1), 11-29.
Kimmel, M. (2011), The Gendered Society, Oxford University Press, UK.
Lorber, J. (1994), Paradoxes of gender, Yale University Press, United States.
Lucal, B. (1999), “What it means to be gendered me: Life on the boundaries of a dichotomous gender system”, Gender and Society, 13 (6),781-797.
McKenna, W. and Kessler S. J. (2006), Transgendering Blurring the Boundaries of Gender, InDavis Kathy, Evans Mary and Lorber Judith (Eds.), Handbook of Gender and Women's Studies, 342-356.
Monro, S. (2005), Gender Politics Citizenship, Activism and Sexual Diversity, Pluto Press, UK.
Monro, S. (2010), Towards a Sociology of Gender Diversity: The Indian and UK Cases. In Hines Sally and Sanger Tam (Eds.), Transgender Identities Towards a Social Analysis of Gender Diversity, 242-258, Routledge, UK.
Nanda, S. (1999), Neither Man nor Woman The Hijras of India, Wadsworth Publishing Company, UK.
Sharma, S K. (2009), Hijras The Labelled Deviants. Gian Publishing House, Delhi.
Spargo, T. (1999), Foucault and Queer Theory, Icon Books, UK.
Stryker, S. (2008), Transgender history, Seal Press.
Stryker, S. (2006), (De) Subjugated Knowledges An Introduction to Transgender Studies, InStryker Susan and Whittle Stephen (Eds.), The Transgender Studies Reader, 1-17, Routledge, UK.
Towle, E. B. and Morgan, L. M. (2006), Romancing the Transgender Native Rethinking the Use of the “Third Gender” Concept. InStryker Susan & Whittle Stephen (Eds.), The Transgender Studies Reader, 666-684, Routledge, UK.
Turner, B. S. (2000), An outline of a general sociology of the body. InBryan S. Turner (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social theory, 481-501, Blackwell, United States.
West, C. and Zimmerman D. H. (1987), Doing Gender.Gender and Society, 1 (2), 125-151.