Management in the context of social contingency: subjectivity, regionality, digitalization
In today's world of complexity, risk, and contingent nature, the role of management can hardly be overestimated. The economy, scientific and technological innovation, socio-cultural development, growth of the quality of life of citizens – both at the level of society and the region – depend on the effectiveness of management. In Russia, the implementation of the Priority Directions for the scientific and technological development is largely associated with management capabilities of the power elites. Numerous sociological projects confirm it. The authors of the articles presented in this issue demonstrate within the framework of their own projects, how management problems can be studied at the level of a separate sphere, city community, professional groups. They consider the specifics of management types and implementation of strategic programs in individual industries and regions. In general, the authors contribute to the development of methodology and approaches that are known in the Russian sociology of management. The key issue of the articles is the thesis that today we need new breakthrough approaches and technologies of managerial impact on development processes, and that their effectiveness depends not so much on the level of digitalization or even control on the implementation of the national projects, but on the orientation of management towards the individual, as well as the harmonization of the power interests and the interests of a society.
Titarenko, L. G. (2021), “Management in the context of social contingency: subjectivity, regionality, digitalization”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 7(4), 5- 17. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2021-7-4-0-1.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Atlas of Russia and its regions modernization: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and problems (2016), in Lapin, N. I. (ed.), VesMir, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Bauman, Z. (2008), Liquid Modernity, Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian)
Bogdanov, V. S. and Smirnova, A. S. (2020), “Problems of sociological measurement of social and network group formation in the context of national projects implementation”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 6 (4), 146-168. (In Russian)
Weber, M. (1990), Selected Works, Progress, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Gorshkov, M. K. (2021), Scientific notes of FNISC RAS, Acute problems of modern Russian science, vol. 10, FNISC RAS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Kafka, F. (1989), Selected works, Raduga, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Mansurov, V. A. and Yurchenko, O. V. (2020), “Reproduction of cultural capital in professional dynasties”, in Sociology and society: traditions and innovations in the social development of regions, RSS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Problems of socio-cultural modernization of Russian regions (2013), in Lapin, N. I. and Belyaeva L. A. (eds.), Academia, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Titarenko, L. G. and Karapetyan, R. V. (2021), “Digital transformation of the labour sphere: a comparative analysis of the indicators of Russia and Belarus”, Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, (1), 52-69. (In Russian)
Tikhonov, A. V. (2020), “Problems of social group formation in regions of the Russian Federation with different levels of socio-cultural modernization: adequate responses to strategic challenges”, Reforming Russia, 18, 160-178. (In Russian).
Joas, H. (2014), “The Age of Contingency”, in Faith as an Option. Possible Futures of Christianity, Stanford University Press, Redwood City.
Wallerstein, I. (2004), World-Systems Analysis. An Introduction, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
This work is based on the international research supported by the BRFFR (grant No. Г20Р-109).