DOI:
10.18413/2408-9338-2015-1-3-55-66
This study explores the preconditions for the change and persistence of religious identity and religious practices in strongly religious transnational messianic movements against the background of their migration experiences. It presents an exploratory comparative micro-analysis of two research cases, i.e., two strongly religious communities, which are located in Germany and which keep different kinds of ties to their superordinate transnational structures. This study raises the question of why in one case a change in religious identity formation takes place, and why this change is absent in the other case. Based on empirical evidence, this article identifies and discusses different religious identification aspects as well as different motivational, organizational and contextual factors responsible for the change or persistence of strongly religious practices and identity formation, against the background of migration.
Number of views: 5804 (view statistics)
Количество скачиваний: 8403
All journals
Send article
Research result. Sociology and Management is included in the scientific database of the RINTs (license agreement No. 765-12/2014 dated 08.12.2014).
Журнал включен в перечень рецензируемых научных изданий, рекомендуемых ВАК
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
1. Baumann M. Migration – Religion – Integration. Buddhistische Vietnamesen und hinduistische Tamilen in Deutschland. Marburg: Dialog – Verlag, 2000. 240 p.
2. Yang F., Ebaugh H.R. Transformations in New Immgrant Religions and Their Global Implications // American Sociological Review. 2001. Vol. 66. № 2. Pp. 269-288.
3. Levitt P. Redefining the Boundaries of Belonging: Thoughts on Transnational Religious and Political Life // The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies – Working Paper 48. March 2002. San Diego: University of California. 60 p. URL: http://ccis.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/wrkg48.pdf (date of access: September 3, 2015).
4. Matras J. Religious Observance and Family Formation in Israel: Some Intergenerational Changes // American Journal of Sociology. 1964. Vol. 69. № 5. Pp. 464-475.
5. Fleishmann F., Phalet K. Integration and Religiosity among the Turkish Second Generation in Europe. A Comparative Analysis across Four Capital Cities // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2012 (Vorab online publiziert 11. Juli 2011). Vol. 35. № 2. Pp. 320-341.
6. Fleischmann F., Phalet K., Klein O. Religious Identification and Politicization in the Face of Discrimination. Support for Political Islam and Political Action among the Turkish and Moroccan Second Generation in Europe // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2011. Vol. 50. № 4. Pp. 628-648.
7. Hirschman Ch. The Role of Religion in the Origins and Adaptation of Immigrant Groups in the United States // International Migration Review. 2004. Vol. 38. № 3. Pp. 1206-1233.
8. Almond G.A., Appleby S.R., Sivan E. Strong Religion. The Rise of Fundamentalisms Around the World. Chicago et al.: University of Chicago Press, 2003. 281 p.
9. Michel O. Spheres and Trajectories of Religiously-Motivated Activism in the Field of Strongly Religious Movements // Partecipazione e Cоnflitto. 2014. № 7(1). Pp. 83-110.
10. Michel O. Religiöse Weltablehnung und Positionierung zum «abweichenden Anderen». Theorie der positionalen Konfliktperformanz am Beispiel des streng religiösen Feldes. Dissertation an der Leibniz Universität Hannover. Hannover: TIBUB, 2014. 388 p. URL: http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e01dh14/810902885.pdf (date of access: October 3, 2015).
11. Strauss A. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Datenanalyse und Theoriebildung in der empirischen soziologischen Forschung. München: Fink, 1998. 372 p.
12. Yin R.K. Applications of Case Study Research. Los Angeles et al.: Sage, 2012. 231 p.
13. Przyborski A., Wohlrab-Sahr M. Qualitative Sozialforschung: ein Arbeitsbuch. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2008. 403 p.