Identity communities and integration attitudes sitisents of Buryatia
The relevance of the study of identification communities in the regions of Russia is due to the strengthening of the processes of ethno-national, socio-cultural, territorial identifications of the population against the background of the formation of the general civil identity of Russians. In empirical sociological studies conducted on the territory of the Russian Federation, the problems and contradictions in the relationship between Russian and regional identities are presented. At the same time, as the corpus of works devoted to this topic shows, the entire spectrum of identities of the population of a particular region is insufficiently covered. The purpose of the publication: to reveal the relationship and the dominant role of one or another type of identity of the inhabitants of the Republic of Buryatia in changing conditions, to describe the factors affecting the type of identity, depending on the ethno-national status, professional and territorial affiliation. The research methodology is based on institutional and comparative approaches. Based on the conducted in 2018-2019. empirical research "Interethnic consent in the Republic of Buryatia in the changing socio-economic conditions" studied 900 respondents in Ulan-Ude and regions of the republic. The object of the study was age groups from 19 to 60 years old and older. The methods of mass survey (questioning) and expert survey (24 in-depth interviews) were used. The participants in the expert survey were educators, non-profit organizations, researchers, heads of centers of national cultures. The novelty of the research lies in the disclosure of the specifics of the regional identity of various generational groups. The research results will allow federal and regional authorities to regulate interethnic processes and form a consistently positive territorial identity of the residents of the Republic of Buryatia
Figures
Dashibalova, I. N. (2022), “Identity communities and integration attitudes sitisents of Buryatia”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 8 (2), 28-38. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-2-0-3
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Avksentiev, V. A., Aksyumov B. V. (2013), “Russians: from civil to civilizational identity”, Nauchnajamysl' Kavkaza, (4), 31-37. (In Russian)
Drobizheva, L. M. (2014), “Ethnic solidarity, civil consolidation and prospects of interethnic harmony in the Russian Federation”, Obshhestvennye nauki I sovremennost', (1), 119-129. (In Russian)
Drobizheva, L. M. (2018a), “Russian Identity: Discussions in the Political Space and the Dynamics of Mass Consciousness”, Polis. Politicheskieissledovanija, (5), 100-115. (In Russian)
Drobizheva, L. M. (2018 b), “Russian general civil identity in scientific and political discussions and public opinion”, Voprosynacional'nyhifederativnyhotnoshenij, 8 (4), 324-336. (In Russian)
Klimova, S. G. (2000), “Stereotypes in the definition of “ours” and “strangers””, Sociologicheskieissledovanija, (12), 13-22. (In Russian)
Kovaleva, A. I. (2019), “Varieties of social identity: approaches and classifications”, Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, (4). 89-103. (In Russian)
Sagitova, L. V. (2019), “Identity politics and its actors in the context of social transformation in the Republic of Tatarstan”, Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Political Sciences, Kaliningrad, 38. (In Russian).
Chernyaev, I. V. (2015), “Regional identity and the formation of a "positive" image of the region: to the question of the theoretical and methodological foundations of the policy of regional development”, Vestnikrossijskojnacii, (3), 196-204. (In Russian).
Yadov, V. A. (1995), “Social and socio-psychological mechanisms of the formation of a person's social identity”, Mir Rossii. Sociologija. Jetnologija, (3-4), 158-181. (In Russian).
Bauman, Z. (1992), “Soil, Blood, and Identity”, Sociological Review, 40, 675-701.
Bornman, E. (2003), “Struggles of identity in the age of globalization: searching for anchors that hold”, Communication, 29 (1-2), 24-47.
Brubaker, R. (1996), Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe, Cambridge, UK.
Вrubaker, R., Сooper F. (2000), “Beyond "identity"”, Theory and Society, 29 (1), 1-47.
Friedmann, J. (1993), “Order and disorderin global systems: asketch”, Social research, 60 (2), 205-234.
Eisenstadt, S. N., Giesen, B. (1995), “The construction of collective identity”, Archives Europeennes De Sociologie, 1 (36), 72-102.
Marc, E. (2009), “La construction identitaire de l’individu”, Identité(S). L’individu, le groupe, la societé, 5-20.
Stets, J. E., Serpe, R. T. (2013), “Identity theory”, Handbook of social psychology, 31-60.
Russia and Inner Asia: Dynamics of Geopolitical, Socioeconomic and Intercultural Interaction (17th-21stCenturies), № 121031000243-5.