Migration and new European dimensions of Bulgarian identity
In the articlechanges in the national identity of Bulgarian citizens under the influence of active migration processes within the European Union (EU) are traced and the process of formation of a supranational (European) identity that has begun is substantiated.The results presented in the article refer to only one region of Bulgaria – the VelikoTarnovo region, since this is a region in which a population of exclusively Bulgarian ethnic origin is concentrated, which makes it possible to observe in a purer form the processes of transformation of the Bulgarian national identity.The results of the survey show that despite all the changes that the national identity undergoes, it continues to be the leading one for the self-identification of Bulgarian citizens at the present stage of the development of society, although there are already signs of the formation of elements of a supranational identity (“citizen of Europe” and “citizen of the world”).On the other hand, empirical results show that when transformation becomes a permanent feature of society, it often leads to the fact that instead of forming a supranational identity, reverse processes of localization and regionalization are observed, which leads to the formation of local identities.The results obtained at the local level, in the VelikoTarnovo region, confirm these conclusions.
Nakova, A. (2022), “Migration and new European dimensions of Bulgarian identity”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 8 (1), 20-32. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-1-0-3.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Albrow, M.(1996), The global age: State and society beyond modernity,Polity Press, Cambridge, 246.
Attali, J.(1999),Fraternités. Une nouvelle utopie,Fayard, 234.
Baumann, Z. (2001),“Identity in the Globalising World”, Social Anthropology, 9 (2), 121-129.
Caglar, A.(1997), “Hyphenated identities and the limits of ‘culture’”, inModood,T. and Werbner,P. (eds.),The politics of multiculturalism in the New Europe,Zed, London, 169-185.
Castells, М.(2004), The power of identity. 2nd ed. Malden; Oxford; Carlton; Blackwell,537.
Eagleton, T. (2000), The idea of culture. Wiley-Blackwell, 168.
Engbersen, G., Snel, E.and De Boom, J. (2010), “A van full of Poles: Liquid migration from Central and Eastern Europe”,inBlack R., Engbersen G., Okolski M. and Pantiru C. (eds.),A continent moving west? EU enlargement and labour migration from Central and Eastern Europe, IMISCOE, Research Series. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 115-140, DOI: 10.5117/9789089641564.
Haller, M. and Ressler, R. (2006),“National and European Identity: A Study of TheirMeanings and Interrelationships”, Revue française de sociologie, 47(4), Sociologie des valeurs: Théoriesetmesuresappliquées au caseuropéen, 817-850.
Hoover, K. R., Marcia, J. and Parris, K. (1997),The Power of Identity. Politics in a New Key. Chatham, N.J.
Hristova-Valtcheva, K. (ed.),(2009),New actors in a new environment: accession to the EU, civil society and multi-level governance,BECSA, Sofia.
Keersmaeker, G.T., Makariev, P. (eds.),(1999),Bulgaria facing culural diversity,IPIS, Sofia.
Miller, R. (2012), The development of European identity/identities: Unfinished business,A Policy Review, European Commission, 124.
Nakova, A. (2014),“The Attitude to the Ethnic «Other” in the Context of Educational Status”,inNicolescu, V., Stanciu, F. and Dramnescu, M. (eds.),Educational Reform in the 21st Century in Balkan Countries, Lumina Publishing, Bucharest, 266-270.
Nakova, A. (2012),“We and the Others: «Among One’s Own” or «A Stranger” in Bulgaria?”,Science and Technologies, Social studies, 2 (7),55-60.
Nikolov, K. (ed.),(2008), Adapting integration in an enlarged European Union, 2,Adapting the enlarged union to the citizen,BECSA, Sofia.
Ongur, H. O.(2010),“Towards a social identity for Europe? A social psychological approach to European identity studies”,Review of European Studies, 2(2), DOI: 10.5539/RES.V2N2P133.
Ritzer, G. and Atalay, Z. (2010), Readings in Globalization: Key Concepts and Major Debates, John Wiley & Sons, 489.
Roudometof, V. (2016), Glocalization: A Critical Introduction, Routledge, 229.
Schiller, N. G., Wimmer, A., Levitt, P. and Kumar, S. (2007), “Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences”,Transnational Studies Reader,578.
Schütze, F. (2011), “Europe as a mental space”, inThe biographical genesis of a European mental space and identification with Europe (unpb. man., part 1 and 2).
Smith, A. D. (1993), National identity,University of Nevada Press,Reno, 227.
Taylor, Ch. et al. (1994),Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition,Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Vertovec, S. (2007),“Super-diversity and its implications”,Ethnic and Racial Studies,30(6), 1024-1054,DOI: 10.1080/01419870701599465.
The article was prepared within the framework of the project “National and European dimensions of the modern identity of Bulgarian citizens”,funded by the Research Foundation of the Republic of Bulgaria, grant № KP06-H50/6/11/30/2020.