Assessing the subjectivity of participants in interaction to reduce inequality in Russian regions
Differences in the level and quality of life of the population, the conditions for the reproduction of its potential and the opportunities for citizens to participate are an important task of regional development in the Russian Federation. State bodies introduce mechanisms for the interaction of various stakeholders. This is aimed at forming a group subject that develops the region. They want to organize such interaction of participants in regional development that will lead to the achievement of the desired results. If the created group subject is effective, then it is subjectness, otherwise it is subjectless (for example, the mechanism is introduced, but communications are of a ritual nature). Various ministries have developed methodologies for monitoring their own mechanisms. Their logic is different, but they all a priori believe that the analyzed mechanism is useful. Therefore, they investigate only the scale of its implementation. How useful the mechanism is is not analyzed. To check the usefulness of the implemented interaction mechanisms, the article proposes a method for determining the subjectness of the implemented interaction mechanism. As a methodological basis for the development of the method, the model of the social body of the problem, described by A.V. Tikhonov (in this study we are talking about the subjectness of a social group formed in the process of regional development). The concept of subjectness is considered for probabilistic situations in which subject-subject interaction is organized. Such subjectness is formed in the process of solving real problems and requires observation of a certain time period (since we are talking about the stability of equally spaced interval series, determined using the Ch. Spearman correlation coefficient, it is necessary to have statistics for at least five years). The developed method is based on the correlation comparison of the time series of the dynamics of the implemented mechanism of interaction and indicators of regional development. This makes it possible to clarify both the presence and strength of the relationship, and the causal relationship between them. For an example of using the subjectness assessment method, one of the most actively implemented mechanisms of interaction is considered – initiative budgeting, public-private partnership and volunteerism.
Figures
Demyanenko, V. I. (2023), “Assessing the subjectivity of participants in interaction to reduce inequality in Russian regions”, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 9 (3), 123-137, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-3-0-9.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Atlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and issues: a collective scientific work (2016), in Lapin, N. I. (ed.), Ves Mir, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Glazunova, V. V. (2023), “Influence of public-private partnership on regional development”, Bulletin of the South Russian State Technical University (NPI). Series: Social and economic sciences, 16 (1), 103-114. DOI 10.17213/2075-2067-2023-1-103-114. (In Russian)
Demyanenko, V. I. (2022), “Comparative analysis of the concept of subjectness in the context of three paradigms of the complexity of social management”, Personality. Culture. Society, 24 (2), 132-142. (In Russian)
Demyanenko, V. I. (2022), “Subjectivity in solving the problems of socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Federation (based on remote analysis of open sources of the Internet)”, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 8 (4), 126-147. DOI 10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-4-1-1. (In Russian)
Dridze, T. M. (2000), “Two new paradigms for social cognition and social practice”, Social communication and social management in ecoanthropocentric and semiosociopsychological paradigms: In 2 books, Publishing House of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Dridze, T.M. (1999), “Social communication as a textual activity in semiosocial psychology”, Social sciences and modernity, 145-152. (In Russian)
Eliseeva, I. I. (2002), General theory of statistics: A textbook for university students studying in the direction and specialty «Statistics» [Obshhaya teoriya statistiki: Uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushhikhsya po napravleniyu i spetsialnosti "Statistika"], Publishing House «Finance and Statistics», Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Ivanov, O. V. (2005), Statistika / Uchebny kurs dlya sotsiologov i menedzherov. Chast 1. Opisatelnaya statistika. Teoretiko-veroyatnostnye osnovaniya statisticheskogo vyvoda [Statistics. Training course for sociologists and managers. Part 1. Descriptive statistics. Theoretical and probabilistic foundations of statistical inference], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Kagan, E. S. (2022), “Evaluation of the effectiveness of the executive authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation”, Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, sociological and economic sciences, 7 (3), 315-322. (In Russian)
Kozlov, A. I. (2002), Statistika: Uchebnoe posobie [Statistics: Textbook], 1, N. Novgorod, Russia. (In Russian)
Lenkov, R. V. & Bogdanov, V. S. (2019), “The problems of “assembly” of future Russian intellectuals as a potential of socio-cultural modernization: sociological and management discourse”, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 5 (4), 163-175. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-4-0-14. (In Russian)
Lenkov, R. V. (2020), “The problem of goal setting for sociocultural modernization of Russian regions: patterns, regulators, subjectivity”, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 6 (4), 42-54. (In Russian)
Lepsky, V. E. (2019), Metodologicheskiy i filosofskiy analiz razvitiya problematiki upravleniya [Methodological and philosophical analysis of the development of management problems], Kogito-Center, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Leshkevich, T. G. (2017), “Global modernity" and a new understanding of subjectivity”, Age of globalization, (3), 31-42. (In Russian)
Merzlyakov, A. A. (2018), “Subjectivity of regions and its significance for reforming”, Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 25, 48-65. (In Russian)
Popov, A. V. (2014), “Regional society: subjectivity as a state of independence of the region”, Humanitarian, socio-economic and social sciences, (12-1), 194-198. (In Russian)
Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of socio-cultural modernization of regions (2017), in Tikhonov, A. V. (ed.), FNISTS RAN publ., Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Theory of statistics (2008), Under the general editorship of the head of the Department of Theory of Statistics and Forecasting at MESI, Professor Minashkin V.G., Eurasian Open Institute, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Tikhonov, A.V. (2017), “Reforming the work of authorities and administration as an urgent national problem”, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 3 (4), 70-106. (In Russian)
Tikhonov, A. V. (2003), Sotsiologicheskie osnovy menedzhmenta v sotsialnoy sfere [Sociological foundations of management in the social sphere], Management and marketing in the social sphere: study guide / V. A. Abchuk, G. E. Alpatov, I. M. Bolotnikov [and others], Knizhny Dom LLC, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian)
Tikhonov, A. (2009), Sotsiologiya upravleniya. Teoreticheskie osnovy [Sociology of management. Theoretical basis], Ka-non+, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Tikhonov, A. V. (2013), Filosofskie problemy sotsiologii. Ocherki [Philosophical problems of sociology. Essays], Special issue “Foundations of the sociology of management” Supplement to the journal “Philosophical Sciences” Ser. Library of a young scientist. (In Russian)