Subjectivity in solving the problems of socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Federation (based on remote analysis of open sources of the Internet)
Reducing interregional differences in the level and quality of life of the population (inequality), accelerating economic growth and technological development, as well as ensuring the national security of the country is the goal of strategies for socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Federation. Managing the achievement of this goal requires decision-making in the political, social and economic planes. But the complexity of the tasks facing decision makers in modern turbulent conditions, according to a number of scientists, makes classical approaches to management based on subject-object relations and mechanistic models insufficient. Therefore, it is proposed to evaluate and predict using the subjectivity of the collective subject (sociocultural body), which characterizes the internal driving principle of the participants involved in the development of the region and the abilities they acquire to act as the cause of what is happening. The goal was to develop a system of indicators of the subjectivity of socio-cultural bodies of the problem of socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Federation, which allows making measurements remotely based on information from open sources on the Internet. The methodological basis of the study was the anthroposocietal approach of N. I. Lapin and the model of the socio-cultural body of the problem of A. V. Tikhonov. We have completed the first part of the study. We have proposed and tested a methodology for collecting open information on the Internet, which is necessary to identify the subjects of the development of the region and the mechanisms of their interaction. On the basis of the data obtained, indicators were determined that allow accumulating open statistical data to assess the subjectivity of the implementation of a long-term strategy for the socio-economic development of the region. Based on the results of the qualitative analysis, a pilot collection of quantitative data was also carried out. It is proposed to make a forecast of the socio-economic development of the region by assessing the formation of the subjectivity of the social body, examining the dynamics of building relationships between the subjects involved in the process. The results obtained will allow in the second part of the study to test the hypotheses put forward in the study: the subjectivity of the socio-cultural body of the socio-economic development of the region does not have a linear dependence on the general level of socio-cultural modernization of the region; The collective subjectivity of the participants involved in the process is of key importance to the success of solving the problems of regional development and its positive dynamics.
Figures
Demyanenko, V. I. (2022), “Subjectivity in solving the problems of socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Federation (based on remote analysis of open sources of the Internet)”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 8 (4), 126-147. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-4-1-1.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Atlas modernizacii Rossii i ee regionov: socioekonomicheskie i sociokul'turnye tendencii i problemy: kollektivnyj nauchnyj trud [Atlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and issues: a collective scientific work] (2016), in Lapin, N. I. (ed.), Ves Mir, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Bourdieu, P. (2002), O televidenii i zhurnalistike [Sur la télévision, suivi de LEmprise du journalism], Foundation for Scientific Research "Pragmatics of Culture", Institute of Experimental Sociology, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Gorshkov, M. K., Sheregi, F. E. (2012), Prikladnaya sotsologiya: metodologiya i metody: interaktivnoe uchebnoe posobie [Applied Sociology: Methodology and Methods: An Interactive Study Guide], FGANU «Center for Sociological Research», Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Guseynova, K. E., Tikhonov, A. V. (2021), “Influence of the power-administrative vertical on the spatial and territorial development of regions”, Vliyanie vlastno-upravlencheskoj vertikali na prostranstvenno-territorialnoe razvitie regionov [Strategy and tactics of socio-economic reforms: national priorities and projects. Materials of the IX All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation], Vologda, Russia, 343-346. (In Russian)
Davydov, A. P. (2022), “Society as a mediation subject of social development (to the methodology of inter-subject dialogue)”, Sociological research, (9), 3-13. (In Russian)
Demyanenko, V. I. (2022), “Comparative analysis of the concept of subjectness in the context of three paradigms of the complexity of social management”, Personality. Culture. Society, 24( 2/114), 132-142. (In Russian)
Demyanenko, V. I. (2020), “Subjectivity of regional authorities in the social body of the problem of reforming the management system in the process of socio-cultural modernization of regions”, Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: traditsii i innovatsii v sotsialnom razvitii regionov : Sbornik dokladov VI Vserossijskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa [Conference: VI All-Russian Sociological Congress "Sociology and Society: Traditions and Innovations in the Social Development of Regions], Tyumen, Russia, 1098-1108. (In Russian)
Dridze, T. M. (2000), “Two new paradigms for social cognition and social practice”, Social communication and social management in ecoanthropocentric and semiosociopsychological paradigms: In 2 books, Publishing House of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 5-42. (In Russian)
Tikhonov, A. V, Bogdanov, V. S., Lenkov, R. V., Merzlyakov, A. A., Shilova, V. A. (2021), “Institutionalization of the sociology of management in the context of the life strategy of a scientist: in memory of a Russian sociologist”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 7(4), 18-32. (In Russian)
Lapin, N. I. (2000), “Sociocultural Approach and Societal-Functional Structures”, Sociology research, (7), 3-12. (In Russian)
Leontiev, D. A. (2010), “What gives psychology the concept of the subject: subjectivity as a dimension of personality”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 25(3), 135-153. (In Russian)
Lepsky, V. E. (2019), Metodologicheskij i filosofskij analiz razvitiya problematiki upravleniya [Methodological and philosophical analysis of the development of management problems], Kogito-Center, Moscow, Russia, 339. (In Russian)
Merzlyakov, A. A. (2018), “Subjectivity of regions and its significance for reforming”, Vestnik Instituta sociologii, (25), 48-65. (In Russian)
Rossiya: reformirovanie vlastnoupravlencheskoj vertikali v kontekste problem sociokul'turnoj modernizacii regionov [Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of socio-cultural modernization of regions] (2017), in Tikhonov, A. V. (ed.), FNISTS RAN publ., Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Tikhonov, A. V. (2017), “Reforming the work of authorities and administration as an urgent national problem”, Research result. Sociology and management, 3(4), 70-106. (In Russian)
Tikhonov, A. V. (2013), Filosofskie problemy sociologii. Ocherki [Philosophical problems of sociology. Essays], Moscow, Russia, 60. (In Russian)
Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2005), “Forecasting, designing and planning in social management”, Sociology of power, (5), 23-45. (In Russian)
Sztompka, P. (2005), Sotsiologiya. Analiz sovremennogo obshchestva. [Sociology. Analysis of modern society.], Logos, Moscow, Russia, 664. (In Russian)