The position of religious communities during the coronavirus pandemic and the reflection on the public opinion in Macedonia
The COVID-19 pandemic affected religion and faith in different ways. The interaction between religious traditions, religious freedom and responsibilities in public health is complex, intertwining the cultural and legal dimensions of social reality. Introduction of numerous restrictive measures for prevention and protection against the spread of coronavirus, in many cases, were contrary to the religious practices of religious communities. The views of the religious communities regarding these measures at the beginning of the pandemic were also reflected in the views of the believers, whose behavior had a kind of response in public opinion. The purpose of this paper is to outline and compare the position of religious communities in Macedonian society at the beginning of the pandemic and their views in late 2020 and early 2021. It also provides an overview and comparison of the public reactions which arose from the position of religious communities regarding restrictive measures and the practice of religious services. To meet the objectives, this paper is divided into two parts, where the first part presents the activities and initiatives of religious communities, while the second part shows the reflections from the activities of religious communities on public opinion. In doing so, both views are based on a qualitative analysis, which in the first part analyzes the reports from religious communities, as well as other public sources, while the second part is a thematic analysis of Twitter Platform. The comparison between the position of the religious communities at the beginning of the pandemic and during the holidays at the end of the year indicates that their position is unchanged, and they clearly support the measures for prevention and protection from the coronavirus. However, the public interest in religious practices has drastically decreased at the end of the year compared to the beginning of the pandemic, although the impatience towards the clergy and believers who attend religious services is identical in both compared periods.
Blazhevski, I., Cacanoska, R. and Gjorgjeski, G. (2021), “The position of religious communities during the coronavirus pandemic and the reflection on the public opinion in Macedonia”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 7 (3), 152-163, DOI:10.18413/2408-9338-2021-7-3-1-3.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998), Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code Development, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2).
Bruns, A. & Moe, H. (2014), “Structural Layers of Communication on Twitter”, in Weller, K. (ed.) Twitter and Society, Peter Lang Publishing, New York, USA.
Bryman, A. (2012), Social Research Methods’, 4th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Chew, C. and Eysenbach, G. (2010), “Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak”, Plos ONE, 5 (11).
Dann, S. (2015), “Twitter Data Acquisition and Analysis: Methodology and Best Practice”, in Burhalter, J. & Wood, N. (eds.) Maximizing Commerce and Marketing Strategies through Micro-Blogging, Business Science Reference.
Eysenbach, G. & Till, J. E. (2001), “Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities”, British Medical Journal, 323 (7321), available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59687/ (Accessed 27 February 2021).
Franzke et al., “Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0”, available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf (Accessed 02 June 2020).
Gjorgjevski, Gj. and Blazhevski, I. (2021), “The Religious Aspect of the Macedonian Society in the Condition of the Crisis Caused by Covid 19”, Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, 41 (1).
Newman, W. L. (2014), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Pearson New International Edition, Seventh Edition, Pearson Education Limited.
“Number of social network users worldwide from 2017 to 2025”, Statista [website], available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (Accessed 10 March 2021).
Rufai, S. R. & Bunce, C. (2020), “World leaders’ usage of Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis”, Journal of Public Health, 42 (3).
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of qualitative research, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
Thomas, D. (2006), “A General Inductive Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis”, American Journal of Evaluation, 27 (2).
Twitter + Developers [website], available at: https://developer.twitter.com/en/developer-terms/policy (Accessed 27 February 2021).
Twitter Quarterly Results: 2020 Fourth Quarter, available at: https://investor.twitterinc.com/financial-information/quarterly-results/default.aspx (Accessed 05 March 2021).
Twitter terms of service [website], available at: https://twitter.com/en/tos, (Accessed 27 February 2021).