Public chambers of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the regonal system of government: the main problems of functioning and evaluation of the efficiency of work
The article deals with the problems of functioning of regional Public Chambers in the system of regional administration, including approaches to the evaluation of their activities. The author identifies the main problems of regional Public Chambers such as the methods of formation, the definition of the basic functions, approaches to evaluation of activities and the potential for interaction with authorities. The study showed that until today, there are no generally accepted adequate tools and scales for measuring and evaluating the development of civil society institutions, which leads to the dominance in journalism and in the scientific literature of descriptive characteristics and judgments with a high degree of subjectivity when considering the activities of regional public chambers. One of the tools for assessing the effectiveness of regional public chambers could be the methods developed within the framework of intellectual capital concepts, adapted to the institutions of civil society. The article formulates recommendations on further directions for the development of regional Public Chambers and methods for evaluating their effectiveness on the basis of measuring intellectual capital. The article was prepared with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 17-03-00328 “Institutions and practices of interaction between the authorities, expert community and public organizations in Russian regions”.
Information for citation: Evstifeev, R. V. (2018), “Public chambers of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the regonal system of government: the main problems of functioning and evaluation of the efficiency of work”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 4 (4), 87-100, DOI:10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-8
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Bryantsev, I. I. (2017), “Specificity of the integration of public policy actors in the system of interaction between government and society”, Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk, 12(3), 137-149. (In Russian).
Evstifeev, R. V. (2017a), “Local identity and building effective interaction of local communities and authorities in Russian cities”, Teorii i problemy politicheskih issledovaniy, (6), 6-27. (In Russian).
Evstifeev, R. V. (2017b), “Using the concept of intellectual capital to assess the potential of interaction between the expert community and authorities at the regional level”, Vremya bol'shih peremen: politika i politiki. Materialy Vserossijskoy nauchnoy konferentsii RAPN [Time for big changes: politics and politicians. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference of the RAPS], RUDN, Moscow, Russia, 130-132. (In Russian).
Zaitsev, A. V. (2017), “Institutionalization of the dialogue between the state and civil society in the sphere of public policy of modern Russia”, D. Sc. Thesis, political sciences, Kazan State University, Kazan, Russia. (In Russian).
Kakabadze, Sh. Sh. (2009), “Institutionalization of the coordination of interests in modern Russia”, PhD Sc. Thesis, political sciences, Higher School of Economy, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Kozlova, N. N. and Gavrikov, V. P. (2017), “Public Chamber of the Tver region as a subject of social and economic development of the region”, Vestnik TvGU.Seriya “Ekonomika i upravlenie”, (3), 127-138. (In Russian).
Kul'nazarova, A. V. (2017), “Dynamics of communicative interaction between the state and society in the Russian segment of the Internet (2000-2016)”, PhD Sc. Thesis, political sciences, RANEPA, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia. (In Russian).
Moryakina, A. R. and Sungurov, A. Yu. (2017), “Public councils and public chambers: the experience of St. Petersburg”, Materialy nauchno-obshchestvennogo foruma «Otechestvennye traditsii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i sovremennost», Velikiy Novgorod, 14 sentyabrya 2017 g. [Materials of the scientific and public forum "National Traditions of Public Administration and Modernity", Veliky Novgorod, September 14, 2017], Moscow, Russia, 60-66. (In Russian).
Potanina, E. A. (2015), “Regional Public Chamber as a social institution of civil society of modern Russia (on the example of the Murmansk region)”, PhD Sc. Thesis, political sciences, Northern (Arctic) Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia. (In Russian).
Sokolov, A. V. (2018), “Network political protest in Russia: subjects, trends and technologies”, D. Sc. Thesis, political sciences, RANEPA, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
Sungurov, A. Yu. (2017), “Think tanks and expert community in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nizhny Novgorod and the North Caucasus”, Politicheskaya kontseptologiya, (2), 115-137. (In Russian).
Tarasenko, A. V. (2009), “Regional advisory bodies as a channel for articulating public interests in modern Russia”, PhD Sc. Thesis, political sciences, Perm State University, Perm, Russia. (In Russian).
Andriessen, D. (2004), Making Sense of Intellectual Capital: designing a Method for the Valuation of Intangibles, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Dumay, J., Guthrie, J. and Puntillo, P. (2015) “IC and public sector: a structured literature review”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16 (2), 267-284.
Corporate Reporting of Intangible Assets: A Progress Report (2012), OECD.
Guthrie, J. and Dumay, J. (2015), “New frontiers in the use of intellectual capital in the public sector”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16 (2), 258-266.
Hall, Peter A. (1988), Policy paradigms, social learning and the state. A paper presented to the International Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Lindblom, Charles E. and Cohen, D. K., (1979), Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Zaytsev, D. (2016), Policy Advice in Russia in 1990s-2000s: from Shaping Political Discourse to Policy Change [Online], available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/09/29/1122368938/Zaytsev_Policy%20Advice%20in%20Russia_Draft.pdf. (Accessed 15 September 2018).