<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Научный результат. Социология и управление</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2026-12-3-0-9.</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4169</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>СОЦИАЛЬНАЯ СТРУКТУРА, СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ ИНСТИТУТЫ И ПРОЦЕССЫ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;&amp;laquo;Ноны&amp;raquo; (религиозно неаффилированные): территориальная динамика и социально-демографический профиль&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;&amp;ldquo;Nones&amp;rdquo; (religiously unaffiliated):&amp;nbsp;territorial dynamics and a socio-demographic profile&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Богдан</surname><given-names>Сергей Сергеевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bogdan</surname><given-names>Sergey</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2026/3/статья_Богдан.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье рассматриваются &amp;laquo;ноны&amp;raquo; (религиозно неаффилированные) как самостоятельная и внутренне неоднородная категория современного религиозного поля, не сводимая ни к атеизму, ни к неверию, ни к простой утрате религиозности. Цель исследования &amp;ndash; выявить межрегиональные паттерны распространения нонов и показать, как социально-демографические предикторы действуют в разных территориальных, институциональных и культурных контекстах. Эмпирическую базу составляет вторичный анализ международных количественных данных World Values Survey, Pew Research Center и сопоставимых мониторингов, дополненный современными национальными исследованиями и локальными кейсами. Теоретическая рамка имеет полипарадигмальный характер: она объединяет секуляризационный подход, постсекулярные интерпретации и область исследования нерелигиозности и секулярности (nonreligion and secularity studies, NRSS), что позволяет развести макро- и микроуровни анализа и не сводить динамику нонов к одной объяснительной модели. Показано, что на макроуровне внешне сходные демографические сдвиги часто описываются через секуляризационные процессы &amp;ndash; дезаффилиацию, ослабление практики и межпоколенческую трансмиссию нерелигиозности, тогда как на микроуровне за ними обнаруживаются смешанные секулярные, постсекулярные и NRSS-конфигурации: культурная конфессиональная идентичность, внеконфессиональная вера, духовность, религиозная индифферентность или ограниченная публичная допустимость неверия. Социально-демографические факторы &amp;ndash; возраст, образование, урбанизация, гендер, семейно-брачные и репродуктивные траектории, уровень благосостояния &amp;ndash; выступают не универсальными причинами, а контекстно-зависимыми механизмами воспроизводства религиозности и нерелигиозности. Делается вывод, что корректное сравнение нонов требует многомерной операционализации, разведения принадлежности, веры и практики, а также учёта демографических, правовых и институционально-культурных режимов конкретных обществ.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article examines &amp;ldquo;nones&amp;rdquo; (the religiously unaffiliated) as an autonomous and internally heterogeneous category of the contemporary religious field that cannot be reduced to atheism, unbelief, or a simple loss of religiosity. The aim of the study is to identify interregional patterns in the spread of nones and to show how socio-demographic predictors operate across different territorial, institutional, and cultural contexts. The empirical basis consists of a secondary analysis of international quantitative data from the World Values Survey, Pew Research Center, and comparable monitoring projects, supplemented by recent national studies and local case studies. The theoretical framework is multi-paradigmatic: it combines secularization theory, post-secular interpretations, and nonreligion and secularity studies (NRSS), making it possible to distinguish between macro- and micro-levels of analysis and to avoid reducing the dynamics of nones to a single explanatory model. The findings show that, at the macro level, externally similar demographic shifts are often described through secularization processes, such as disaffiliation, the weakening of practice, and the intergenerational transmission of non-religiosity, whereas at the micro level, they reveal mixed secular, post-secular, and NRSS configurations: cultural confessional identity, non-denominational belief, spirituality, religious indifference, or limited public legitimacy of unbelief. Socio-demographic factors, such as age, education, urbanisation, gender, family and marital status, reproductive history, and level of well-being, do not function as universal causes, but rather as context-dependent mechanisms in the reproduction of religiosity and non-religiosity. The article concludes that valid comparisons of nones require multidimensional operationalization, a clear distinction between affiliation, belief, and practice, and attention to the demographic, legal, institutional, and cultural regimes of specific societies.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>религиозные ноны</kwd><kwd>религиозно неаффилированные</kwd><kwd>религиозная дезаффилиация</kwd><kwd>секуляризация</kwd><kwd>постсекулярность</kwd><kwd>исследования нерелигиозности и секулярности</kwd><kwd>полипарадигмальный подход</kwd><kwd>территориальная динамика религии</kwd><kwd>социально-демографические предикторы</kwd><kwd>World Values Survey (WVS)</kwd><kwd>Pew Research Center (PRC)</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>religious nones</kwd><kwd>religiously unaffiliated</kwd><kwd>religious disaffiliation</kwd><kwd>secularization</kwd><kwd>post-secularity</kwd><kwd>nonreligion and secularity studies</kwd><kwd>multi-paradigmatic approach</kwd><kwd>territorial dynamics of religion</kwd><kwd>socio-demographic predictors</kwd><kwd>World Values Survey (WVS)</kwd><kwd>Pew Research Center (PRC)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Богдан С.&amp;nbsp;С. От исследования религиозно &amp;laquo;никаких&amp;raquo; к становлению социологии &amp;laquo;нерелигии&amp;raquo; // Научный результат. Социология и управление. 2025. Т. 11, № 2. С. 4-21. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2025-11-2-0-1. EDN: FOKRXW.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Инглхарт Р. Неожиданный упадок религиозности в развитых странах. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2022. 238 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Кублицкая Е. А. Особенности религиозности в современной России // Социологические исследования. 2009. № 4(300). С. 96-107. EDN: JZFQOZ.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Кублицкая Е.&amp;nbsp;А. Методолого-методический анализ соотношения религиозной и конфессиональной самоидентификаций (на примере изучаемых субъектов РФ) // Научный результат. Социология и управление. 2024. Т. 10, № 1. С. 11-27. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2024-10-1-0-2. EDN: XIPWEA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Лебедев С.&amp;nbsp;Д., Сухоруков В.&amp;nbsp;В. Религия и идентичности в позднемодерном социуме // Социология религии в обществе позднего модерна. 2024. Т. 13, № 1. С. 5-9. EDN: KWAFBM.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Лопаткин Р.&amp;nbsp;А. Социология религии в России: опыт прошлого и современные проблемы // Государство, религия, Церковь в России и за рубежом. 2010. Т. 28, № 4. С. 266-272. EDN: PFGRPB.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Руткевич Е.&amp;nbsp;Д. О современном мире, (не) религиозном разнообразии и пост-секулярной перспективе // Научный результат. Социология и управление. 2023. Т. 9, № 2. С. 58-76. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-2-0-5. EDN PFIPEY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Смирнов М.&amp;nbsp;Ю. Исследование религии в контексте современной секуляризации: поиск подхода // Вестник Института социологии. 2024. Т. 15, № 2. С. 13-27. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2024.15.2.2. EDN: WHXFZF.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>&amp;Aring;rsheim H., Mauritsen A. L., &amp;amp; Zwilling A. L. Introduction &amp;ndash; Non-religion in Late Modern Societies / Non-religion in Late Modern Societies. Springer Science+Business Media. 2022. Pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92395-2_1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Balazka D. Mapping Religious Nones in 112 Countries: An Overview of European Values Study and World Values Survey Data (1981&amp;ndash;2020). Trento: Fondazione Bruno Kessler. 2020. 51 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344176211_Mapping_Religious_Nones_in_112_Countries_An_Overview_of_European_Values_Study_and_World_Values_Survey_Data_1981-2020 (дата&amp;nbsp;обращения: 15.03.2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Beider N. Religious residue: The impact of childhood religious socialization on the religiosity of nones in France, Germany, Great Britain, and Sweden // British Journal of Sociology. 2023. Vol. 74, № 1. Pp. 50-69. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Breskaya O. Religious upbringing in the family and individual autonomy of &amp;lsquo;Nones&amp;rsquo;: a comparative study of youth in Italy and Russia // International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 2025. Vol. 45, № 7-8. Pp. 725-742. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-10-2024-0510.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Bub&amp;iacute;k T., Remmel A., V&amp;aacute;clav&amp;iacute;kD. (Eds.) Freethought and Atheism in Central and Eastern Europe. The Development of Secularity and Nonreligion. London, New York: Routledge. 2020. 346 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780429276071.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Bullivant S. Explaining the Rise of &amp;ldquo;Nonreligion Studies&amp;rdquo;: Subfield Formation and Institutionalization within the Sociology of Religion // Social Compass. 2020. Vol. 67, №1. Pp. 86-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>C&amp;aacute;ceres I., Gonz&amp;aacute;lez A. Progressivism and Religious Disaffiliation in Chile: Responses to Social Movements // International Journal of Latin American Religions. 2024.Vol. 8. Pp. 609-631. DOI: 10.1007/s41603-024-00267-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Chao L. L, Yang F. Measuring religiosity in a religiously diverse society: The China case // Social Science Research. 2018. Vol. 74. Pp. 187-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.04.001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Cipriani R., Ricucci R. Introduction. Discussing religions in a globalized world. Trends, changes and novelties // Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2020. Vol. 6, №. 3. Pp. 4-8. EDN ZWKKIP.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Corcoran K. E., Scheitle Ch. P., Dabbs E. Multiple (Non)Religious Identities Leads to Undercounting Religious Nones and Asian Religious Identities // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2021. Vol. 60, №. 2. Pp. 424-441. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12719.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Cragun R. T., Kosmin, B. A., Keysar, A., Hammer, J. H., Nielsen, M. On the Receiving End: Discrimination toward the Non-Religious in the United States // Journal of Contemporary Religion. 2012. Vol. 6027, №1. Pp. 105-127. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2012.642741</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Cragun R. T., Smith J.M. Goodbye Religion. The Causes and Consequences of Secularization. NYU Press. 2024. 352 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Cragun R.T., Rabbia H.H., Urstad S.S., Beyer P. Measuring Nonreligion as Absence: Testing Various Approaches // Secularism and Nonreligion. 2025. Vol. 14(1). Article 6. DOI: 10.5334/snr.212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Da Costa N. Non-Affiliated Believers and Atheists in the Very Secular Uruguay // Religions. 2020. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 50. DOI: 10.3390/rel11010050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Evans J., Lesage K., Corichi M. Many Religious &amp;lsquo;Nones&amp;rsquo; Around the World Hold Spiritual Beliefs. Pew Research Center. 2025. DOI: 10.58094/695q-4j55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Esquivel J. Religiously Disaffiliated, Religiously Indifferent, or Believers without Religion? Morphology of the Unaffiliated in Argentina // Religions. 2021. Vol. 12, № 7. P. 472. DOI: 10.3390/rel12070472.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Gadsby B. A. The Nones of Mombasa: Religious Disbelief and Disaffiliation on the East African Coast // Journal of Africana Religions. 2024. Vol. 12, № 1. Pp. 29-52. DOI: 10.5325/jafrireli.12.1.0029.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Gez Y. N., Beider N., Dickow H. African and Not Religious: The State of Research on Sub-Saharan Religious Nones and New Scholarly Horizons // Afrika Spectrum. 2022. Vol. 57, №1. Pp. 50-71. DOI: 10.1177/00020397211052567.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>G&amp;ouml;tmark F, Andersson M. Human fertility in relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, and family planning programs // BMC Public Health. 2020. Vol. 20, №1. P. 265. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8331-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Hackett C., Stonawski M., Tong Y., Kramer S., Shi A.F., and Fahmy D. Religiously unaffiliated population change /How the Global Religious Landscape Changed From 2010 to 2020. Pew Research Center. 2025. DOI: 10.58094/fj71-ny11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Haerpfer C., Inglehart R., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano&amp;nbsp;J., M. Lagos P. Norris E. Ponarin&amp;amp; B. Puranen (eds.). World Values Survey: Round Seven &amp;ndash; Country-Pooled Datafile Version 6.0. Madrid, Spain &amp;amp; Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute &amp;amp; WVSA Secretariat. 2022. DOI: 10.14281/18241.24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Inglehart R., Haerpfer C., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos M., Norris P., Ponarin E. &amp;amp; Puranen B. et al. (eds.). World Values Survey: Round Six &amp;ndash; Country-Pooled Datafile Version. 2014. URL: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp.&amp;nbsp;(дата&amp;nbsp;обращения: 10.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>J&amp;auml;rnefelt E. Beneath the Surface: A Critique of the Common Survey Model in the Study of Nonreligion // Secularism and Nonreligion. 2020. Vol. 9, № 4. Pp.&amp;thinsp;1-9. DOI: 10.5334/snr.106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Kasselstrand I. &amp;amp; Zuckerman P. &amp;amp; Cragun R. Beyond Doubt: The Secularization of Society. NYU Press. 2023. 240 p. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479814305.001.0001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Kim A.&amp;nbsp;E., Seo W.&amp;nbsp;M., Kang G. Beyond Belief: Understanding the Demographics and Dynamics of South Korea&amp;rsquo;s Religious &amp;ldquo;Nones&amp;rdquo; // Religions. 2025.Vol.16, №10. P. 1317. DOI: 10.3390/rel16101317.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Knippenberg H. Secularization and Transformation of Religion in Post-War Europe. In: Brunn, S. (eds) The Changing World Religion Map. Springer, Dordrecht. 2015. Pp. 2101-2127. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_111.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Lee L. Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic &amp;lsquo;not religious&amp;rsquo; categories and populations// Religion. 2014. Vol. 44, №3. Pp. 466-482. DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2014.904035.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Lee L. Recognizing the Non-religious: Reimagining the Secular. Oxford University Press. 2015. &amp;nbsp;248 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Lesage K., Starr K. J. and Miner W. Around the World, Many People Are Leaving Their Childhood Religions. Pew Research Center. 2025. DOI: 10.58094/xt5h-b241.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Lesage&amp;nbsp;K., Evans J., Corichi M., Thomas S. Catholicism Has Declined in Latin America Over the Past Decade. Pew Research Center. 2026. DOI: 10.58094/93ce-0a97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Levin J., Bradshaw M., Johnson B. R., Stark R. Are Religious &amp;ldquo;Nones&amp;rdquo; Really Not Religious?: Revisiting Glenn, Three Decades Later // Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. 2022. Vol. 18. Article&amp;nbsp;7. URL: https://www.baylorisr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2022-IJRR-Are-Religious-Nones-Really-Not-Religious.pdf&amp;nbsp;(дата обращения: 14.04.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Lewis J. R. Education, Irreligion, and Non-religion: Evidence from Select Anglophone Census Data // Journal of Contemporary Religion. 2015. Vol. 30, №2. Pp. 265-272.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>M&amp;uuml;ller O., Porada C. Towards a Society of Stable Nones: Lifelong Non-Denominationalism as the Prevailing Pattern in East Germany // Religions. 2022. Vol. 13, №11. P. 1024. DOI: 10.3390/rel13111024.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Norris P., Inglehart R. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Olson L. R., Green J. C., Blitzer A. L. Belonging, Behaving, and Believing: Assessing the Role of Religion on Presidential Approval // Political Research Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 61, No. 1. Pр. 132-144. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313075.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><mixed-citation>Quack J., Schulz M. Who Counts as &amp;lsquo;None&amp;rsquo;? // Religion and Society.2023. Vol. 14, №1. Pp. 126-139. DOI: 10.3167/arrs.2023.070303.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><mixed-citation>Rosa Gonz&amp;aacute;lez F. M., Cabrera L. A Sociological Perspective on Religious Identification in Spain: A Multidimensional Analysis Based on Empirical Data (Over 467,187 Individuals) // Secularism and Nonreligion. 2023. Vol.12, №1. P. 4. DOI: 10.5334/snr.176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><mixed-citation>Sakellariou A. Greek Society in Transition: Trajectories from Orthodox Christianity to Atheism // Non-religion in Late Modern Societies / &amp;Aring;rsheim H., Mauritsen A. L., Zwilling A. L. (eds.). Cham: Springer, 2022. Pp. 129-150. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92395-2_8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><mixed-citation>Seong H. The Rise of Religious Nones and Its Impact on Interreligious Dialogue: Examining &amp;ldquo;Religious Literacy&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Meditation&amp;rdquo; as Mediating Mechanisms // Religions. 2025. Vol. 16, № 8. P. 1057. DOI: 10.3390/rel16081057.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><mixed-citation>Stolz J., de Graaf N.D., Hackett C., Antonietti J-P. The three stages of religious decline around the world // Nature Communications. 2025. Vol. 16. P. 7202. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-62452-z.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><mixed-citation>The Freedom of Thought Report 2021. Humanists International. URL: https://demens.nu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Freedom-of-Thought-Report-2021.pdf&amp;nbsp;(дата&amp;nbsp;обращения: 04.03.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><mixed-citation>Thiessen J., Wilkins-Laflamme S. None of the Above: Nonreligious Identity in the US and Canada. New York University Press, 2020. 272 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><mixed-citation>Tromp P., Kulkova A. and Houtman D. Note: Religious Decline or Religious Change? Evidence from Thirteen Western-European Countries (1981-2008). 2019. URL: https://www.dickhoutman.nl/mediatheek/files/tromp_et_al._2019.pdf&amp;nbsp;(дата&amp;nbsp;обращения: 16.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><mixed-citation>Urstad S. S. The Religiously Unaffiliated in Norway // Nordic Journal of Religion and Society. 2017. Vol. 30, № 1. Pp. 61-81. DOI: 10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2017-01-04.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><mixed-citation>Voas D., McAndrew S. Three Puzzles of Non-religion in Britain // Journal of Contemporary Religion. 2012. Vol. 27, № 1. Pp. 29-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><mixed-citation>Wilkins-Laflamme S. And then there were none: Regional dynamics of non-religious identities, beliefs and practices among Canadian millennials // Studies in Religion. 2023. Vol. 52, № 3. Pp. 358-380. DOI: 10.1177/00084298221102926.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><mixed-citation>Woodhead L. The rise of &amp;lsquo;no religion&amp;rsquo; in Britain: The emergence of a new cultural majority// Journal of the British Academy. 2016. Vol. 4. Pp. 245-261. DOI: 10.5871/jba/004.245.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>