<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Научный результат. Социология и управление</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2021-7-1-0-3</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2342</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>СОЦИАЛЬНАЯ СТРУКТУРА, СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ ИНСТИТУТЫ И ПРОЦЕССЫ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Дифференциация подходов к изучению социальных проблем в Румынии. Обзор литературы&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Divergent Perspectives about Social Problems in Romania.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Longitudinal Literature Review&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Маринеску</surname><given-names>Валентина</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Marinescu</surname><given-names>Valentina</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>vmarinescu9@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Бухарестский университет, Факультет социологии и социальной работы, Румыния, Бухарест, бульвар Шиту Магуреану, №5, сектор 5</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2021/1/39-48.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья направлена на выявление основных тенденций, зафиксированных в научном анализе того, как румынские СМИ представляют внутренние социальные проблемы. Метод исследования заключается в систематическом анализе методов, используемых исследователями для изучения репрезентации в СМИ уязвимых социальных групп. Анализ основывается на выборке из семидесяти научных статей, опубликованных в румынских научных журналах, на тему репрезентации в СМИ социально уязвимых групп. Статья состоит из трех основных частей. В первом разделе приводится обзор международной литературы, специализирующейся на так называемой &amp;laquo;теории фрейминга&amp;raquo;, которая является основной общей концептуальной рамкой, используемой для анализа представлений СМИ об уязвимых группах. Второй раздел посвящен результатам исследовательского проекта, выполненного по вышеупомянутой теме, а последний третий раздел содержит выводы, сделанные из сравнения специализированной литературы и результатов систематического анализа. Результаты показали, что в последние годы (2000-2019) академические статьи по теме (научный анализ того, как румынские СМИ представляют уязвимые группы) имеют существенные недостатки с точки зрения содержания. В добавок к этому неточное (свободное) представление фактов и отсутствие теоретических и/или практических выводов являются другим существенным недостатком репрезентации в румынских СМИ уязвимых социальных групп. Очевидно, что в отсутствие этих элементов проанализированные исследования оказались фактически простой проверкой в румынском контексте уже соществующих теорий и не представили никаких элементов новизны, дальнейшего развития, как концептуально, так и методологически.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This research primarily focuses on identifying the main trends documented in the scientific analysis of the way in which the Romanian media presented the internal social aspects. The method of research was the systematic analysis of the method used by the researchers in order to study the media representation of disadvantaged social groups. The analysis was made on a sample of seventy scientific articles published in Romanian scientific journals on the topic of media representation of disadvantaged social groups. The article is structured in three main parts. The first section reviews the international literature specialized on what is known as &amp;ldquo;Framing Theory&amp;rdquo;, which is the main general conceptual framework used to address representations of disadvantaged groups by the media. In the second part, I included the research project carried out on the above-mentioned subject, and the last section was devoted to the conclusions derived from the comparison between the specialized literature and the results of the systematic analysis. The reslts showed that in recent years (2000-2019), academic articles on this topic (scientific analysis of how the Romanian media presented disadvantaged groups) have recorded significant shortcomings in terms of content. At the same time, the loose presentation method, the omission of the implications in theoretical and/or practical terms and the studies that did not contain a section dedicated to the conclusions are a second subset of deficient elements highlighted in our analysis. It is obvious that in the absence of these elements, the analyzed studies have become, in fact, simple validations in Romanian context of established theories and have not presented elements of novelty, further development, both conceptually and methodologically.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>уязвимые группы</kwd><kwd>СМИ</kwd><kwd>теория фрейминга в массовой коммуникации</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>disadvantaged groups</kwd><kwd>media</kwd><kwd>the framing theory in mass communication</kwd><kwd>subject coverage in mass communication</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Benford, R. D., &amp;amp; Snow, D. A. (2000), &amp;ldquo;Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment&amp;rdquo;, Annual review of sociology, 26 (1), 611-639.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Cappella, J. N., &amp;amp; Jamieson, K. H. (1997), Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Chong, D., &amp;amp; Druckman, J. N. (2007), &amp;ldquo;A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 57 (1), 99-118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Cook, T. D., &amp;amp; Leviton, L. C. (1980), &amp;ldquo;Reviewing the literature: A comparison of traditional methods with meta‐analysis 1&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Personality, 48 (4), 449-472.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>D&amp;rsquo;Angelo, P. (2002), &amp;ldquo;News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 52 (4), 870-888.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>De Vreese, C. H. (2005), &amp;ldquo;News framing: Theory and typology&amp;rdquo;, Information design journal &amp;amp; document design, 13 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Emmers-Sommer, T. M., &amp;amp; Allen, M. (1999), &amp;ldquo;Surveying the effect of media effects: A meta-analytic summary of the media effects research in Human Communication Research&amp;rdquo;, Human communication research, 25 (4), 478-497.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Entman, R. M. (1991), &amp;ldquo;Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 41 (4), 6-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Gamson, W. A., &amp;amp; Modigliani, A. (1989), &amp;ldquo;Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach&amp;rdquo;, American journal of sociology, 95 (1), 1-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Gerhards, J. (1995), &amp;ldquo;Framing dimensions and framing strategies: contrasting ideal-and real-type frames&amp;rdquo;, Social Science Information, 34 (2), 225-248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Hertog, J. K., &amp;amp; McLeod, D. M. (2001), &amp;ldquo;A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide&amp;rdquo;, in Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H. and Grant, A. E. (eds.) Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 139-161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., &amp;amp; Jackson, G. B. (1986), Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies, Vol. 4, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Ihlen, &amp;Oslash;., &amp;amp; Nitz, M. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Framing contests in environmental disputes: Paying attention to media and cultural master frames&amp;rdquo;, International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2 (1), 1-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Li, S., &amp;amp; Tang, S. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Mass communication research on China from 2000 to 2010: A meta-analysis&amp;rdquo;, Asian Journal of Communication, 22 (4), 405-427.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Lim, J., &amp;amp; Jones, L. (2010), &amp;ldquo;A baseline summary of framing research in public relations from 1990 to 2009&amp;rdquo;, Public Relations Review, 36 (3), 292-297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Maher, T. M. (2001), &amp;ldquo;Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting&amp;rdquo;, in Reese, S. D., Gandy O. S. Jr. and Grant, A. E. (eds.) Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 83-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>McCombs, M. E., &amp;amp; Shaw, D. L. (1972), &amp;ldquo;The agenda-setting function of mass media&amp;rdquo;, Public opinion quarterly, 36 (2), 176-187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Neuman, W. R., Neuman, R. W., Just, M. R., &amp;amp; Crigler, A. N. (1992), Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Pan, Z., &amp;amp; Kosicki, G. M. (2001), &amp;ldquo;Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation&amp;rdquo;, in Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H. Jr. and Grant, A. E. (eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 35-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Potter, W. J., &amp;amp; Riddle, K. (2007), &amp;ldquo;A content analysis of the media effects literature&amp;rdquo;, Journalism &amp;amp; Mass Communication Quarterly, 84 (1), 90-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Price, V., &amp;amp; Tewksbury, D. (1997), &amp;ldquo;News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing&amp;rdquo;, in Barnett, G. A. and Boster,&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;J. (eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion, Ablex, Greenwich, CT, USA, 173-212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Reese, S. D. (2007), &amp;ldquo;The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 57 (1), 148-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Baran, S. (2001), &amp;ldquo;Prologue &amp;ndash; Framing public life: A bridging model for media research&amp;rdquo;, in Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H. and Grant, A. E. (eds.), Framing public life, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Scheufele, B., &amp;amp; Scheufele, D. A. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Of Spreading Activation, Applicability, and Schemas Conceptual Distinctions and Their Operational Implications&amp;rdquo;, in D&amp;rsquo;Angelo, P. and Kuypers, J. A. (eds.) Doing news framing analysis, Routledge, New York, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Scheufele, D. A. (2000), &amp;ldquo;Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication&amp;rdquo;, Mass communication &amp;amp; society, 3 (2-3), 297-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Scheufele, D. A. (1999), &amp;ldquo;Framing as a theory of media effects&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 49 (1), 103-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Scheufele, D. A., &amp;amp; Tewksbury, D. (2007), &amp;ldquo;Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 57 (1), 9-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Semetko, H. A., &amp;amp; Valkenburg, P. M. (2000), &amp;ldquo;Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 50 (2), 93-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Shah, D. V., Domke, D., &amp;amp; Wackman, D. B. (1996), &amp;ldquo;To thine own self be true&amp;rdquo; values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies, Communication Research, 23 (5), 509-560.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Snow, D. A. &amp;amp; Benford, R. D. (1992), &amp;ldquo;Master frames and cycles of protest&amp;rdquo;, in Morris, A. D. and McClurg Mueller, C. (eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory, Yale University Press, New Haven, 133-155, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Snow, D. A., Rochford Jr., E. B., Worden, S. K., &amp;amp; Benford, R. D. (1986), &amp;ldquo;Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation&amp;rdquo;, American sociological review, 464-481.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Uman, L.S. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Systematic reviews and meta-analyses&amp;rdquo;, Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20 (11), 57-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Van Gorp, B. (2006), &amp;ldquo;The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in&amp;rdquo;, Journal of communication, 57 (1), 60-78.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>