<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Научный результат. Социология и управление</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-4-0-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1819</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>СОЦИОЛОГИЯ КУЛЬТУРЫ И ДУХОВНОЙ ЖИЗНИ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Бог и пол. Динамика изменений религиозности в странах бывшей СФРЮ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>God and gender. The Dynamics of Changes in Religiosity in the Countries of the Former SFRY</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бакрач</surname><given-names>Владимир</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bakrac</surname><given-names>Vladimir</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>bvladimir@t-com.me</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Самарджич</surname><given-names>Обрад</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Samardzic</surname><given-names>Obrad</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>obradsamardzic@gmail.com</email></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Университет Черногории, 81000, Черногория, Подгорица, Бульвар Джорджа Вашингтона</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2019/4/14-25.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье рассматриваются различия между отношением &amp;nbsp;мужского пола и отношением женского пола к (не)религиозности в республиках бывшей Югославии. Человеческий род создан божьим сотворением мужского и женского, а Эрих Фромм утверждает, что в потребности человеческого рода в религии укоренилось само стремление человека к религии. Исследуя периодику (не)религиозности в рамках различий между полами, можно заметить преобладание религиозности женского пола по сравнению с мужским. В некоторых социо-психологических теориях мы находим определенные объяснения доминации женщин в религиозности. Вторая часть статьи посвящена анализу некоторых исследований, проведенных в Черногории, Сербии, Боснии и Герцеговине, Македонии и Хорватии. Предметом анализа является сравнение половой структуры религиозности в данных республиках в период с 1989 по 2003 гг.&amp;nbsp; Нас интересовало, существуют ли изменения в динамике религиозности мужчин и женщин, как и направление данных изменений. Важным результатом сравнительного анализа является установленная динамика изменения половой структуры и религиозности. В соответствии с этим, установлен и рост доли мужчин на фоне незначительного уменьшения количества женщин в религии.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In this paper, the author analyzes the differences between male and female gender in relation to (non-)religiosity. The humankind began with divine creation of male and female, and Erich Fromm claims that the need for religion is rooted in the basic conditions of humankind. We can notice more frequent religiosity of the females in relation to the males by following the periodicity of (non-) religiosity in relation to gender differences. Starting from some psycho-sociological theories, we find a kind of explanation for female domination in religiosity. The second part of the paper is based on the results of a study conducted in the former Yugoslav republics. In the analysis, we used a comparative methodology in these republics in the period from 1989 to 2010. We were interested in whether there are any changes in the dynamics of religiosity of men and women, and in what direction they are going. An important result of the comparative analysis is an insight into dynamics of the changes of gender and religiosity. Accordingly, we can detect an increase in the proportion of men, and a slight decrease in the proportion of women in religiosity. The basic conclusion of this analysis is that at the beginning of the twenty-first century, there was a kind of egalitarianism in religiosity of the male and female gender in comparison with the studies from the socialist period. The studies in the socialist period gave a plausible advantage to the religiosity of the female gender. Obviously, the new millennium brings certain changes in religiosity of the gender in the countries of the former Yugoslavia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>пол</kwd><kwd>половые различия</kwd><kwd>религиозность</kwd><kwd>секуляризация</kwd><kwd>десекуляризация</kwd><kwd>ревитализация религии</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>gender</kwd><kwd>gender differences</kwd><kwd>religiosity</kwd><kwd>secularization</kwd><kwd>desecularization</kwd><kwd>revitalization of religion</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Anić R.&amp;nbsp;J. Spolne razlike u religioznosti pod vidom obrazovanja // Bogoslovska smotra. 2008. 78, №&amp;nbsp;4. S. 873-903.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bakrač V. Religija i mladi &amp;ndash; religioznost mladih u Crnoj Gori. Podgorica- Belgrade: Narodna knjiga &amp;amp; Miba book, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Бакрач В., Благојевич М. Конвенциональная религиозность молодежи в Черногории // Социологические исследования. 2016. №&amp;nbsp;5. С. 104-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Bassett L., Miller S., Anstey K. Picturing God: A nonverbal measure of God concep for conservative Protestants // Journal of Psiychology and Christianity. 1990. № 9. S. 73-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Berger L.P. Questions of Faith &amp;ndash; A Sceptical Affirmation of Christianity, United Kingdom and USA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Bovoar S. Starost I. Beograd: BIGZ, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Bruce S. Secularization: In Defence of an Unfashionable Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Črpić G., Ku&amp;scaron;ar S. Neki aspekti religioznosti u hrvatskoj // Bogoslovska smotra. 1998. №&amp;nbsp;4. S. 513-563.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Črpić G., Bi&amp;scaron;čan Ž. Mu&amp;scaron;ko i žensko između uloge i osobe // Bogoslovska smotra. 2000. № 2. S. 421-442.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Davie G. Europe: The exceptional Case. London: Darton, Longman and Todd Ltd, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Davie G. Religija u suvremenoj Еuropi. Zagreb: Golden marketing i Tehnička knjiga, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Finke R., Starks R. The Churching of America, 1776-1900: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Flere S. Rod i religioznost // Sociologija. 2002. №&amp;nbsp;3. S. 255-270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Dillon M. Can post-secular society tolerate religious differences? // Sociology of Religion. 2010. №&amp;nbsp;2. S. 39-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Habermas J. Notes on a post-secular society // Sign and Sight. URL: http://print.signandsight.com/features/1714 (дата обращения: 16.09.2014).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Halman L., Paterson T. A decline of religious values? // Globalization, Value Change and Generations; P. Ester, M. Braun, P. Mohler (eds.). Leiden &amp;ndash; Boston: Brill, 2006. S. 117-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Inglehart R. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, Nj: Princeton University Press, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Kornel V. Plod drveta saznanja // Oksfordska istorija islama; Dz. Espozito. Beograd: CLIO, 2002. S. 81-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Marinović-Jerolimov D. Tradicionalna religioznost u Hrvatskoj 2004-između kolektivnoga i individualnoga // Sociologija sela. 2004. №&amp;nbsp;2. S. 289-302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Niče, F. S one strane dobra i zla. Beograd: Dereta, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Walter T., Davie G. The Religiosity of women in the modern West // British Journal of Sociology. 1998. №&amp;nbsp;4. S. 640-660.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Wilson B. The Secularization Thesis: Criticism and Rebutals in Rudy Learmans // Secularization and Social integration; Wilson Bryan &amp;amp; Jaak Billiet. Belgium: Leuven Univerzity Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Zrin&amp;scaron;čak S., Črpić G., Ku&amp;scaron;ar S. Vjerovanje i religioznost // Bogoslovska smotra. 2000. №&amp;nbsp;2. S. 233-255.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>