<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2016-2-4-47-51</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">885</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ROLE OF COMMUNICATION PRACTICES IN THE FORMATION OF IDENTITY OF ORTHODOX BELIEVERS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ROLE OF COMMUNICATION PRACTICES IN THE FORMATION OF IDENTITY OF ORTHODOX BELIEVERS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Grishaeva</surname><given-names>Ekaterina Iv.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Grishaeva</surname><given-names>Ekaterina Iv.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>Ekaterina.grishaeva@urfu.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2016/4/47-51.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The paper describes how various communication practices affect the identity building process in the church discourse. We understand the church discourse as a discourse which the Russian Orthodox Church as a religious institution recreates and controls. The results are based on a series of interviews with priests, conducted in Tambov and Sverdlovsk regions. The discourse analysis (M. Foucault, E. Laclau and Ch. Mouffe) is the main methodological framework of the research. The discourse subject is formed through communication practices and at the same time expresses identity through them. As the results proved, communication practices in the church discourse can be vertical and horizontal. Vertical communication is constituted through the asymmetry of roles between the priesthood and the congregation. Horizontal communication practices is a series of interactions of parish members. Vertical and horizontal communication practices are important for the interpretation of religious values, introducing changes in performing discursive roles and following regulations.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper describes how various communication practices affect the identity building process in the church discourse. We understand the church discourse as a discourse which the Russian Orthodox Church as a religious institution recreates and controls. The results are based on a series of interviews with priests, conducted in Tambov and Sverdlovsk regions. The discourse analysis (M. Foucault, E. Laclau and Ch. Mouffe) is the main methodological framework of the research. The discourse subject is formed through communication practices and at the same time expresses identity through them. As the results proved, communication practices in the church discourse can be vertical and horizontal. Vertical communication is constituted through the asymmetry of roles between the priesthood and the congregation. Horizontal communication practices is a series of interactions of parish members. Vertical and horizontal communication practices are important for the interpretation of religious values, introducing changes in performing discursive roles and following regulations.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>religious identity</kwd><kwd>Orthodoxy</kwd><kwd>communication practices</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>religious identity</kwd><kwd>Orthodoxy</kwd><kwd>communication practices</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Foucault M. The order of discourse:&amp;nbsp; the Will to Truth: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different years. Moscow: Castal, 1996. Pp. 49-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Benwell B., Stokoe E. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. 314 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Breakwell, G. Coping with Threatened Identities. London: Methuen, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman, 1995. 235&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Foucault M. The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 1982. Vol. 8. № 4. Pp. 777-795.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Hall S. Who needs &amp;laquo;identity&amp;raquo;? Identity: A Reader. London: Sage, 2000. Pp. 15-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso, 2001. 240 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Seul J.R. &amp;laquo;Ours is the Way of God&amp;raquo;: Religion, Identity, And Intergroup Conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 1999. Vol. 36. №5. Pp. 553-569</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>