2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2016-2-3-62-69812SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFETHE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT: SOCIO-ÉCONOMIQUE AND METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSISTHE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT: SOCIO-ÉCONOMIQUE AND METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSISChervinskiAlexander SergeevichChervinskiAlexander Sergeevicha.chervinski@gmai.com20162300

In study of the problem of environmental quality, a common methodological mistake is reduction of the problem to everyday idea of quality as consumer characteristics of product. As a result, the ecological-economic interpretation of the problem is represented mostly by the development of the mechanisms of normative determination of materially significant features of ecological complex expressed in certain monetary equivalents. Identification of environmental quality with its functional properties implemented in the system of social-natural relations is a gross philosophical-methodological mistake. Just as the quality of an object is not identical to its property, the quality of environment should not be identified with neither properties nor social functions of natural complexes.

In study of the problem of environmental quality, a common methodological mistake is reduction of the problem to everyday idea of quality as consumer characteristics of product. As a result, the ecological-economic interpretation of the problem is represented mostly by the development of the mechanisms of normative determination of materially significant features of ecological complex expressed in certain monetary equivalents. Identification of environmental quality with its functional properties implemented in the system of social-natural relations is a gross philosophical-methodological mistake. Just as the quality of an object is not identical to its property, the quality of environment should not be identified with neither properties nor social functions of natural complexes.

environmental qualitymethodological base of ecological-economic assessmentcategories «quality»«property»«function»environmental qualitymethodological base of ecological-economic assessmentcategories «quality»«property»«function»Список литературы1. Cultural norms, war and the environment. Peace research inst.; un environment progr. N.Y.: Oxford univ. Press, 2008. XIV. 177 p.2. Dalmasso E., Delmarre A. Mutations socio-econmiques en Italie. Problemes polit. Et sociaux. P., 2010. № 624. Pp. 2-62.3. Le defi d’etre humain: Rapp. de la commiss. Independante sur les questions. P.: Berger-Levrault, 2008. 262 p.4. Economie de l’environnement et du patrimoine naturel. Rev. econ. P., 1990. vol. 41, n 2. Pp. 181-431.5. Economics and the environment. OECD observer, P., 2004. N. 130. Pp. 30-34.6. Elliot R., Gare A., Goodin R., Warren M.A., Attfield R. Environmental philosophy st. Lucia etc.; Univ. of queensland press 2013 xiv, 303 p.7. Sagoff M. Process or product? Ethical priorities in environmental management. Environmental ethics. Athens, 2006. vol. 8, n 2. Pp. 121-138.8. Young O.R. Natural resources and the state berkeley etc.; Univ. of California press 2001 XI, 227 p.9. UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2008 Transnational Corporations and the Infrastructure Challenge. Overview. N.Y. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2008.10. World Development Indicators. Washington 2007. The World Bank, 2007.11. Concluziile raportului final al Comisiei Senatoriale pentru Privatizare. URL: www.euractiv.ro