<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2016-2-3-11-19</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">798</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE SOCIOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY  IN POLYETHNIC REGION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE SOCIOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY  IN POLYETHNIC REGION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bogatova</surname><given-names>Olga Anatolyevna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bogatova</surname><given-names>Olga Anatolyevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>bogatovaoa@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2016/3/11-19.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>In the paper various sociological methodology and techniques of measurement of the religiousity, usable in regional sociological surveys are compared and evaluated in the aspect of their validity: the methodology accepted in the international researches, on the one hand, and the Post-Soviet techniques based on methodology of the Soviet sociology of religion as discipline originated under ideological influence of scientific atheism. The conclusion consists in the statement about the advantages of modern international sociological methodology and techniques as more relevant to a religious situation in the Russian society.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the paper various sociological methodology and techniques of measurement of the religiousity, usable in regional sociological surveys are compared and evaluated in the aspect of their validity: the methodology accepted in the international researches, on the one hand, and the Post-Soviet techniques based on methodology of the Soviet sociology of religion as discipline originated under ideological influence of scientific atheism. The conclusion consists in the statement about the advantages of modern international sociological methodology and techniques as more relevant to a religious situation in the Russian society.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>religion</kwd><kwd>religiousity</kwd><kwd>sociological measurement</kwd><kwd>validity</kwd><kwd>regional survey</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>religion</kwd><kwd>religiousity</kwd><kwd>sociological measurement</kwd><kwd>validity</kwd><kwd>regional survey</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2007. P. 145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2. Field C. Measuring Religious Affiliation in Great Britain: The 2011 Census in Historical and Methodological Context. 2014. Vol. 44. №3. Pp. 374-376.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3. Lee L. Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic &amp;lsquo;not religious&amp;rsquo; categories and populations. Religion. 2014. Vol. 44. №3. P. 477.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4. Osipov G.V. (ed.) Working book of sociologist. Moscow: &amp;laquo;LIBROCOM&amp;raquo;, 2009. P. 253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5. The World&amp;#39;s Newest Major Religion: No Religion. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/04/160422-atheism-agnostic-secular-nones-rising-religion.html (date of access: 23.04.2016)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6. Davie G. Is Europe an Exceptional Case? The Hedgehog Review. 2006. Spring &amp;amp; Summer. Pp. 23-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7. Voas D., Day A. Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward an Unexcluded Middle in the Study of Religion. ARDA Guiding Paper Series. URL: http://www.thearda.com/rrh/papers/guidingpapers/voas_essay.doc. (date of access: 23.04.2016)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8. Pew Research Center 2014 Religious Landscape Study (RLS-II) Main Survey of Nationally Representative Sample of Adults FINAL Questionnaire. May 30, 2014. URL: http://www.pewforum.org/files/2016/04/RLS-national-telephone-survey-questionnaire.pdf. (date of access: 23.04.2016)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9. Lebedev A.A. The secularization of the socialist city population. Towards a society free of religion (secularization process in a socialist society). Moscow: Mysl, 1970. P. 134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>10. Kublickaya E.A. Features of of studying of religiosity of the population in modern Russia (methodology and research methods). Sociological studies. 2009. №2. P. 102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>11. Ugrinovitch D.M. Introduction to Religious Studies. 2-nd edition., supp. Moscow.: Mysl, 1985. Pp. 139-140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>12. Lebedev A.A. The secularization of the socialist city population. Towards a society free of religion (secularization process in a socialist society). Moscow: Mysl, 1970. P. 138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>13. Lenin V.I. Letter to comrades. Omnibus edition. V. 34. P. 408. URL: http://leninism.su/works/73-tom-34/1711-pismo-k-tovarishham-34.html. (date of recourse: 23.04.2016).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>14. Cozer L. The Functions of Social Conflict. Translation from Eng. by O.A. Nazarova. Moscow: Idea-Press, Dom intellektualnoy knigi, 2000. P. 123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>15. Levada U.A. The social nature of religion. Moscow: Nauka, 1965. P. 174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>16. Yablokov I.N. Sociology of religion. Moscow: Mysl, 1979. Pp. 129-130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>17. Ugrinovitch D.M. Introduction to Religious Studies. Moscow.: Mysl, 1985. Pp. 143-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>18. Kublickaya E.A. Features of of studying of religiosity of the population in modern Russia (methodology and research methods). Sociological studies. 2009. №2. P. 97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>19. Voas D. The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review. 2009. Vol. 25 №2. P. 156.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>