<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2026-12-3-0-4</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4164</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Non-traditional religious views&amp;nbsp;among Moscow and Belgorod residents of different marital statuses&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Non-traditional religious views&amp;nbsp;among Moscow and Belgorod residents of different marital statuses&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Lyutenko</surname><given-names>Irina Викторовна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lyutenko</surname><given-names>Irina</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>blodrein@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Demographic Research FNSC RAS</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2026/3/статья_Лютенко.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article examines the relationship between the marital status of the population and their non‑traditional religious views and practices, using Moscow and the Belgorod region as case studies. The relevance of this sociological research stems from the transformation of social institutions in the context of globalisation and the growing popularity of non‑traditional religious and mystical movements &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp;including in traditionally Orthodox regions of Russia. Studying this relationship helps to better understand the processes of cultural and religious transformation in society. The aim of this work is to study the characteristics of non‑traditional religiosity among populations with different marital statuses (the groups are: &amp;ldquo;not married&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;in a registered marriage&amp;rdquo;, and &amp;ldquo;in an unregistered marriage&amp;rdquo;) in two regions: the multi‑confessional metropolis of Moscow and the Belgorod region, where Orthodoxy dominates. The methodology is based on a comprehensive approach to operationalising the concept of &amp;ldquo;non‑traditional religiosity&amp;rdquo; through two components: the religious consciousness and cultic behaviour of respondents. In 2024, a questionnaire survey was conducted at the Institute of Social Demography of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISD FNSC RAS) among the population (N=500 in Moscow, N=501 in the Belgorod region). The &amp;ldquo;in a registered marriage&amp;rdquo; group demonstrates the highest level of belief in God (85-97%) coupled with minimal interest in alternative beliefs (27-35 %), which confirms the role of institutional marriage as a guardian of traditional attitudes. Respondents in the &amp;ldquo;in an unregistered marriage&amp;rdquo; group show the greatest interest in non‑traditional religions: 69% in Moscow and 58% in the Belgorod region. In Moscow, the involvement of this group in non‑traditional cultic activities reaches 60%, which is 3.5 times higher than among those in an official marriage (17%). Although the motivation to turn to non‑traditional religions and mystical teachings varies by region, no correlation with marital status is observed. Empirical results of the sociological research show that marital status influences religious consciousness and cultic practice among non‑traditional believers: most respondents who are in an official marriage uphold traditional values, while those who prefer alternative forms of family relationships are more open to accepting non‑traditional religious and mystical teachings.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article examines the relationship between the marital status of the population and their non‑traditional religious views and practices, using Moscow and the Belgorod region as case studies. The relevance of this sociological research stems from the transformation of social institutions in the context of globalisation and the growing popularity of non‑traditional religious and mystical movements &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp;including in traditionally Orthodox regions of Russia. Studying this relationship helps to better understand the processes of cultural and religious transformation in society. The aim of this work is to study the characteristics of non‑traditional religiosity among populations with different marital statuses (the groups are: &amp;ldquo;not married&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;in a registered marriage&amp;rdquo;, and &amp;ldquo;in an unregistered marriage&amp;rdquo;) in two regions: the multi‑confessional metropolis of Moscow and the Belgorod region, where Orthodoxy dominates. The methodology is based on a comprehensive approach to operationalising the concept of &amp;ldquo;non‑traditional religiosity&amp;rdquo; through two components: the religious consciousness and cultic behaviour of respondents. In 2024, a questionnaire survey was conducted at the Institute of Social Demography of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISD FNSC RAS) among the population (N=500 in Moscow, N=501 in the Belgorod region). The &amp;ldquo;in a registered marriage&amp;rdquo; group demonstrates the highest level of belief in God (85-97%) coupled with minimal interest in alternative beliefs (27-35 %), which confirms the role of institutional marriage as a guardian of traditional attitudes. Respondents in the &amp;ldquo;in an unregistered marriage&amp;rdquo; group show the greatest interest in non‑traditional religions: 69% in Moscow and 58% in the Belgorod region. In Moscow, the involvement of this group in non‑traditional cultic activities reaches 60%, which is 3.5 times higher than among those in an official marriage (17%). Although the motivation to turn to non‑traditional religions and mystical teachings varies by region, no correlation with marital status is observed. Empirical results of the sociological research show that marital status influences religious consciousness and cultic practice among non‑traditional believers: most respondents who are in an official marriage uphold traditional values, while those who prefer alternative forms of family relationships are more open to accepting non‑traditional religious and mystical teachings.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>non-traditional religions</kwd><kwd>marital status</kwd><kwd>cultic behaviour</kwd><kwd>population</kwd><kwd>Moscow</kwd><kwd>Belgorod region</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>non-traditional religions</kwd><kwd>marital status</kwd><kwd>cultic behaviour</kwd><kwd>population</kwd><kwd>Moscow</kwd><kwd>Belgorod region</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Balagushkin, E. G. (1999), Netradiеыionnye religii v sovremennoy Rossii: morfologichesky analiz&amp;nbsp;[Non‑traditional religions in modern Russia: A Morphological Analysis], Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Golod, S. I. (1998), Semya i brak: istoriko‑sotsiologichesky analiz&amp;nbsp;[Family and Marriage: A Historical and Sociological Analysis], Petropolis, St. Petersburg, Russia, ISBN: 5-86708-113-3, EDN:&amp;nbsp;YQXVEN. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Giddens, A. (2004), Transformatsiya intimnosti: Seksualnost, lyubov i erotizm v sovrem. o‑vakh&amp;nbsp;[The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies], translated by V. Angurin, Piter, St. Petersburg, Russia, ISBN: 5-469-00133-4. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Durkheim, E. (2018), Elementarnye formy religioznoy zhizni: totemicheskaya sistema v Avstralii&amp;nbsp;[Elementary Forms of Religious Life: The Totemic System in Australia], translated from French by A. Apollonov and T. Kotelnikova], Delo Publishing House: RANEPA, Moscow, Russia, DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2018-2-122-154, EDN: XYZJOP. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Zagirova, E. M. (2017), &amp;ldquo;The Influence of the Type of Religiosity on the Attitude to the Traditional Family&amp;rdquo;, Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 20(2), 82-103, EDN:&amp;nbsp;ZSRATF. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Zimova, N. S., Nerobeeva, T. S. (2025), &amp;ldquo;The Influence of Religiosity on Marriage and Family Attitudes of Modern Youth&amp;rdquo;, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 11(1), 91-109, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.18413/2408-9338-2025-11-1-0-6. EDN:&amp;nbsp;TPNOFC. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Kalachikova, O., Kozlova, O., Arkhangelsky, V. (2022), &amp;ldquo;The religious determinant of reproductive intentions of Russians&amp;rdquo;, Gosudarstvo, religiya, Tserkov v Rossii i za rubezhom, 40(4), 105-138, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.22394/2073-7203-2022-40-4-105-138. &amp;nbsp;EDN:&amp;nbsp;KBEZCZ. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Kublitskaya, E. A. (1990), &amp;ldquo;Traditional and non‑traditional religiosity: an experience of sociological study&amp;rdquo;, Sociological Research, (5), 95-103, EDN:&amp;nbsp;BGWJUG. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Kublitskaya, E. A., Lebedev, S. D. (2022), &amp;ldquo;On the analysis of the religious situation in the Belgorod region&amp;rdquo;, Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya, filologiya, kulturologiya, 13(3), &amp;nbsp;DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.15862/46SCSK322, &amp;nbsp;EDN:&amp;nbsp;VRBQAI. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Lebedev, S. D. (2025), &amp;ldquo;Religious and worldview strategies of Russian youth&amp;rdquo;, Science. Culture. Society, 31(3), 26-40, DOI: 10.19181/nko.2025.31.3.2. EDN: CRMDWE. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Lyutenko, I. V. (2025), &amp;ldquo;Non‑traditional religious views of Belgorod students&amp;rdquo;, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 11(3), 44-60, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.18413/2408-9338-2025-11-3-0-3, EDN:&amp;nbsp;HVVULV.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Martinovich, V. A. (2015), Netraditsionnaya religioznost: vozniknovenie imigratsya: Materialy k izuchenyu netraditsionnoy religioznosti&amp;nbsp;[Non-traditional religiosity: emergence and migration: Materials for studying unconventional religiosity], 1, Minsk Theological Academy, Minsk, Belarus, ISBN: 978-985-7028-11-5. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Martinovich, V. A. (2024), Sotsialnaya identifikatsiya novykh religioznykh dvizheny v Respublike Belarus&amp;nbsp;[Social identification of new religious movements in the republic of Belarus], RIVSh, Minsk, Belarus, ISBN: 978-985-586-794-5. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Mitrokhin, L. M. (1985), Religii &amp;laquo;novogo veka&amp;raquo;&amp;nbsp;[Religions of the &amp;lsquo;New Age&amp;rsquo;], Sovetskaya Rossiya, Moscow, USSR. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Prutskova, E. V., Pavlyutkin, I. V., Borisova, O. N. (2023) &amp;ldquo;Religiosity and Fertility in Russia and Other European Countries: The Effect of Social Context&amp;rdquo;, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes,&amp;nbsp;(2), 103-126, DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2023.2.2359.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Amato, P., Booth, A., Johnson, D., Rogers, S. (2007), Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Barker, A. (1997), New religious movements, Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Campbell, C. (1972), &amp;ldquo;The cult, the cultic milieu and secularization&amp;rdquo;, A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain, (5), 119-136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Campbell, C. (2010), &amp;ldquo;The Easternisation of the West: Or, How the West Was Lost&amp;rdquo;, Asian Journal of Social Science, 38(5), 738-757.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Coontz, S. (1992). The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Davie, G. (1994), Religion in Britain since 1945: believing without belonging, Blackwell, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and self‑identity: self and society in the late modern age, stanford, Stanford University Press, Calif.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Heelas, P. (1996), The New Age movement: religion, culture and society in the age of postmodernity, Wiley‑Blackwell.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies, NJ: Princeton University Press, Princeton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (2005), Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press,&amp;nbsp;Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Luckmann, T. (1967), The invisible religion: the problem of religion in modern society, Macmillan, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Schewel, S. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Understanding immobility: moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies&amp;rdquo;, International Migration Review, 54(2), 328-355.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Stark, R., Bainbridge, W. S. (1987), A Theory of кeligion, Peter Lang, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Wallis, R. (1984), The Elementary forms of the new religious life, Routledge &amp;amp; Kegan Paul, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Wilson B. R. (1976), Contemporary Transformations of Religion,&amp;nbsp;Macmillan, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Whitehouse, H. (2004), Modes of religiosity: a cognitive theory of religious transmission, Bloomsbury Academic.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Wilson B. R.&amp;nbsp;(1976), Contemporary Transformations of Religion,&amp;nbsp;Macmillan, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>