<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2026-12-3-0-1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4161</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>EDITORIAL</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;The religion of values&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;The religion of values&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Cipriani</surname><given-names>Roberto</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Cipriani</surname><given-names>Roberto</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>roberto.cipriani@tlc.uniroma3.it</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>University of Rome 3, Department of Education, 66 Iv. Miлhailov St., Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2026/3/статья_Чиприани.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The role of values in religious phenomenology has been extensively emphasised on numerous occasions. Such a complexity of attitudes and behaviours represents a skilful and effective attempt at a schematic and didactic re-presentation of a whole series of diversifications and stratifications relating to religious (and conversely non-religious) reality.&amp;nbsp;The golden rule would be not to do unto others what one would not wish to be done unto oneself; in short, a practical, everyday maxim, a precept that is easily identifiable and applicable.&amp;nbsp;In practice, values relating to the emotional and relational sphere (family, respect, friendship, love) are complemented by practical and moral values (work, honesty, loyalty, solidarity).&amp;nbsp;Among the 428 value-related responses identified in the qualitative interviews, there is a clear hierarchy, confirming the primary importance of the family (18%) and, to a slightly lesser extent, respect and justice (14.7%), followed by solidarity, hospitality and sharing (10.7%); further behind are work (7.7%), friendship and love (7.2%), education, culture and respect for traditions (6.8%), religiosity and devotion (5.8%), and freedom (4.2%).&amp;nbsp;Now, in our qualitative survey, the values of autonomy, tradition, benevolence (as altruism) and universalism are found, albeit under different names, but those of conformity, power, security, success, stimulation and hedonism do not seem to feature prominently, at least not in an overt and declared form.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The role of values in religious phenomenology has been extensively emphasised on numerous occasions. Such a complexity of attitudes and behaviours represents a skilful and effective attempt at a schematic and didactic re-presentation of a whole series of diversifications and stratifications relating to religious (and conversely non-religious) reality.&amp;nbsp;The golden rule would be not to do unto others what one would not wish to be done unto oneself; in short, a practical, everyday maxim, a precept that is easily identifiable and applicable.&amp;nbsp;In practice, values relating to the emotional and relational sphere (family, respect, friendship, love) are complemented by practical and moral values (work, honesty, loyalty, solidarity).&amp;nbsp;Among the 428 value-related responses identified in the qualitative interviews, there is a clear hierarchy, confirming the primary importance of the family (18%) and, to a slightly lesser extent, respect and justice (14.7%), followed by solidarity, hospitality and sharing (10.7%); further behind are work (7.7%), friendship and love (7.2%), education, culture and respect for traditions (6.8%), religiosity and devotion (5.8%), and freedom (4.2%).&amp;nbsp;Now, in our qualitative survey, the values of autonomy, tradition, benevolence (as altruism) and universalism are found, albeit under different names, but those of conformity, power, security, success, stimulation and hedonism do not seem to feature prominently, at least not in an overt and declared form.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>religion</kwd><kwd>theists</kwd><kwd>extra-theists</kwd><kwd>non-theists</kwd><kwd>morality</kwd><kwd>values</kwd><kwd>beliefs</kwd><kwd>family</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>religion</kwd><kwd>theists</kwd><kwd>extra-theists</kwd><kwd>non-theists</kwd><kwd>morality</kwd><kwd>values</kwd><kwd>beliefs</kwd><kwd>family</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Ammerman, N. T. (1997), &amp;ldquo;Golden Rule Christianity: Lived Religion in the American Mainstream&amp;rdquo;, Lived Religion in America, D. D. Hall (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, 196-216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Beck, U. (2009), Il Dio personale. La nascita della religiosit&amp;agrave; secolare, Laterza, Roma-Bari.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Beck, U. (2008), Der eigene Gott. Von der Friedensf&amp;auml;higkeit und dem Gewaltpotential der Religionen, Verlag der Weltreligionen im Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main-Leipzig.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Beck, U. (2014), A God of One&amp;rsquo;s Own: Religion&amp;rsquo;s Capacity for Peace and Potential for Violence, Polity Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Belardinelli, S., Gattamorta, L. (a cura di) (2012), I valori hanno bisogno della religione?, Rubbettino. Soveria Mannelli.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Cacciari, M. (2018), &amp;ldquo;L&amp;rsquo;aut-aut sull&amp;rsquo;Europa di Romano Guardini&amp;rdquo;, Vita e Pensiero, CI, 2, 87-96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Cipriani,&amp;nbsp;R. (1993), &amp;ldquo;De la religion diffuse &amp;agrave; la religion des valeurs&amp;rdquo;, Social Compass, 40, 91-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Cipriani, R. (2012), &amp;ldquo;La religione dei valori&amp;rdquo;. In S. Belardinelli, L.&amp;nbsp;Gattamorta (a cura di), I valori hanno bisogno della religione?, Rubbettino, Soveria Mannelli, 87-105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Cipriani, R. (2021), L&amp;rsquo;incerta fede. Un&amp;rsquo;indagine quanti-qualitativa in Italia, FrancoAngeli, Milano.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Heinich,&amp;nbsp;N. (2017), Des valeurs. Une approche sociologique, Gallimard, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Heinich,&amp;nbsp;N. (2020), &amp;ldquo;A pragmatic redefinition of value(s): Toward a general model of valuation&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Theory, Culture &amp;amp; Society,&amp;nbsp;37&amp;nbsp;(5), 75-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Herzog, P., Beadle, De A. T. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Emerging Adult Religiosity and Spirituality: Linking Beliefs, Values, and Ethical Decision-Making&amp;rdquo;, Religions, 9 (3), 84, 1-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Inglehart, R., Bas&amp;aacute;&amp;ntilde;ez, M., D&amp;iacute;ez-Medrano, J., Halman, L., Luijkx, R. (2004), Human Beliefs and Values: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook Based on the 1999-2002 Values Surveys, Siglo XXI, Mexico City.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>L&amp;eacute;vy-Bruhl, L. (1903), La morale et la science des m&amp;oelig;urs, Alcan, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>L&amp;eacute;vy-Bruhl, L. (1905), Ethics and Moral Science, Constable, London. Kessinger Publishing, Whitefish, Mt, 2008; Ulan Press, Ulan Bator, 2012; Nabu Press, New York, 2013; HardPress, Lenox, Ma, 2019; Wentworth Press, London, 2019; Legare Street Press, s. l., 2022; Hudson Street Press, New York, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. H., Bilsky, W. (1987), &amp;ldquo;Toward a Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 551.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>