<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2025-11-2-0-3</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3780</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;The institutional approach to the study of the mediatization&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;of religion:&lt;br /&gt;
the experience of application to modern Orthodoxy&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;The institutional approach to the study of the mediatization&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;of religion:&lt;br /&gt;
the experience of application to modern Orthodoxy&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kovalenko</surname><given-names>Vladimir Дмитриевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kovalenko</surname><given-names>Vladimir</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2025/2/33-48_Kovalenko_V_D.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article is devoted to the issue of the prospects for a sociological study of the process of mediatization of modern Orthodoxy. The relevance of the proposed study consists of several aspects. Firstly, the process of mediatization is a new topic for sociology, the theoretical field itself is very multidirectional; at the moment, there are several national and regional schools and theoretical and methodological approaches. Secondly, the concept of mediatization opens up the possibility of studying mediatization in different spheres of society &amp;ndash; for example, culture or politics, as well as religion. Mediatization of religion is a major area in modern world sociology, but there are practically no domestic studies on this topic. A very large layer of public life remains outside the focus of researchers, despite the growing role of new digital media in the life of religious groups. However, the application of developments from world sociology to the domestic religious field faces certain difficulties. Various methods in world experience were applied to the study of mainly Protestant and Catholic branches of Christianity, and the Orthodox direction remains almost unexplored. Domestic sociological science needs to create an original array of studies on the mediatization of the largest domestic religious tradition &amp;ndash; Orthodoxy. The purpose of this work is to describe the experience of applying one of the most common theoretical and methodological approaches in the sociology of mediatization &amp;ndash; institutional &amp;ndash; to the study of modern Orthodoxy. Additionally, it is necessary to describe the functionality of this approach and its alternatives. The first, theoretical part of the article provides an analysis of the modern theoretical field of mediatization, theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of mediatization. Further, the problems of using the institutional approach to the study of Orthodoxy are described. In the empirical part of the study, a figurative approach is used, created within the framework of the figurative approach of Norbert Elias. The use of this approach allows us to consider modern mediatized communication through 4 components and record local features of Orthodox groups. The conclusions formulate the main functional aspects of applying the institutional approach to the study of the mediatization of Orthodoxy. A description of its dysfunctional sides is given and methodological alternatives are proposed.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the issue of the prospects for a sociological study of the process of mediatization of modern Orthodoxy. The relevance of the proposed study consists of several aspects. Firstly, the process of mediatization is a new topic for sociology, the theoretical field itself is very multidirectional; at the moment, there are several national and regional schools and theoretical and methodological approaches. Secondly, the concept of mediatization opens up the possibility of studying mediatization in different spheres of society &amp;ndash; for example, culture or politics, as well as religion. Mediatization of religion is a major area in modern world sociology, but there are practically no domestic studies on this topic. A very large layer of public life remains outside the focus of researchers, despite the growing role of new digital media in the life of religious groups. However, the application of developments from world sociology to the domestic religious field faces certain difficulties. Various methods in world experience were applied to the study of mainly Protestant and Catholic branches of Christianity, and the Orthodox direction remains almost unexplored. Domestic sociological science needs to create an original array of studies on the mediatization of the largest domestic religious tradition &amp;ndash; Orthodoxy. The purpose of this work is to describe the experience of applying one of the most common theoretical and methodological approaches in the sociology of mediatization &amp;ndash; institutional &amp;ndash; to the study of modern Orthodoxy. Additionally, it is necessary to describe the functionality of this approach and its alternatives. The first, theoretical part of the article provides an analysis of the modern theoretical field of mediatization, theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of mediatization. Further, the problems of using the institutional approach to the study of Orthodoxy are described. In the empirical part of the study, a figurative approach is used, created within the framework of the figurative approach of Norbert Elias. The use of this approach allows us to consider modern mediatized communication through 4 components and record local features of Orthodox groups. The conclusions formulate the main functional aspects of applying the institutional approach to the study of the mediatization of Orthodoxy. A description of its dysfunctional sides is given and methodological alternatives are proposed.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>mediatization of Orthodoxy</kwd><kwd>mediatization</kwd><kwd>digital media</kwd><kwd>Orthodoxy</kwd><kwd>institutional approach</kwd><kwd>telegram</kwd><kwd>communicative figuration</kwd><kwd>media</kwd><kwd>messenger</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>mediatization of Orthodoxy</kwd><kwd>mediatization</kwd><kwd>digital media</kwd><kwd>Orthodoxy</kwd><kwd>institutional approach</kwd><kwd>telegram</kwd><kwd>communicative figuration</kwd><kwd>media</kwd><kwd>messenger</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Burdyo, P. (2002), O televidenii i zhurnalistike&amp;nbsp;[About television and journalism], Fond nauchnyh issledovany &amp;ldquo;Pragmatika kultury&amp;rdquo;, Institut eksperimentalnoy sotsioligii, Moscow, Russia,&amp;nbsp;ISBN:&amp;nbsp;5-7333-0041-8, EDN:&amp;nbsp;TDSBMB. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Grishaeva, E.&amp;nbsp;I., Shumkova, V.&amp;nbsp;A. (2017), &amp;ldquo;The Conservative model of Orthodox identity: based on the analysis of confessional mass media&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik LGU im. A.S. Pushkina, (1), 193-204, EDN:&amp;nbsp;YJTUW.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Kovalenko, V. D. (2024a), &amp;ldquo;National and regional schools for studying the process of mediatization in sociology&amp;rdquo;, Vlast,&amp;nbsp;32 (5), 150-158, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.24412/2071-5358-2024-5-150-158, EDN:&amp;nbsp;SLOGGO. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Kovalenko, V. D. (2024b), &amp;ldquo;The mediatized discourse of Orthodox students about the Russian Orthodox Church&amp;rdquo;, Research Result. Sociology&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;Management, (3), 36-51, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.18413/2408-9338-2024-10-3-0-3, EDN:&amp;nbsp;FVFCZU. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Kovalenko, V. D.&amp;nbsp;(2024), &amp;ldquo;Mediatized Orthodoxy on Social Media of the Executive Authorities of the Northwestern Federal District in the COVID-19 Era&amp;rdquo;, Politika i Obshhestvo, (2), &amp;nbsp;63-76, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.7256/2454-0684.2024.2.71161,&amp;nbsp;EDN:&amp;nbsp;RNJYRA. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Lebedev, S.&amp;nbsp;D. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Virtualization of the religious community as a key to understanding the evolution of sociological concepts of religiosity&amp;rdquo;, Kontsept: filosofya, religya, kultura, 4 (3), 85-104, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-85-104&amp;nbsp;EDN:&amp;nbsp;WNOTCA.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Ostrovskaya, E. A. (2022), &amp;ldquo;An alternative media discourse on the Russian Orthodox Church: Orthodox Telegram channels&amp;rdquo;, Monitoring,&amp;nbsp;2 (168), 454-476, DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.2.2046, EDN:&amp;nbsp;OPJXLA.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Ostrovskaya, E.&amp;nbsp;A. (2023), &amp;ldquo;The institutional approach to the sociological study of mediatization: conceptual components and research examples&amp;rdquo;, Medialingvistika,&amp;nbsp;(4), 598-620, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.14515/monitoring.2022.2.2046, EDN:&amp;nbsp;OPJXLA.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Ostrovskaya, E.&amp;nbsp;A., Alekseeva, E.&amp;nbsp;V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Confessions in the digital dimension: Units of structured observation&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;VAAE,&amp;nbsp;(4), 204-210, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.20874/2071-0437-2018-43-4-204-212&amp;nbsp;, EDN:&amp;nbsp;MIWCUP. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Ostrovskaya, E.&amp;nbsp;A. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Online mediatization of confession among Orthodox online churches VK-communities&amp;rdquo;, Logos et Praxis, 17 (3), 45-58, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2018.3.6, EDN:&amp;nbsp;YTRDRZ.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Rodionova, E. V., Baier, Yu. P. (2020), &amp;ldquo;A place of salvation or torment: the image of the Russian Orthodox Church in the secular media during the COVID-19 pandemic&amp;rdquo;, Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, (6), 448-469, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1748, EDN:&amp;nbsp;EVIQDT. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Hjyarvard, S. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Three forms of mediatized religion: changing the face of religion in the public space&amp;rdquo;, Gosudarstvo, religya, tserkov v Rossii i za rubezhom, (2), 41-75, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.22394/2073-7203-2020-38-2-4i-75, EDN:&amp;nbsp;OZPVHJ.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Adolf, M. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Clarifying mediatization: Sorting through a current debate&amp;rdquo;, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3&amp;nbsp;(2), 153-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Altheide, D. L., Snow, R.&amp;nbsp;P. (1979), Media Logic, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Braga, J. L. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Sobre &amp;ldquo;mediatiza&amp;ccedil;&amp;atilde;o&amp;rdquo; como processo interacional de refer&amp;ecirc;ncia&amp;rdquo;, Paper presented at the 15o. Comunicaci&amp;oacute;n,&amp;nbsp;(11), 21-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Couldry, N., Hepp, A. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Conceptualizing mediatization: contexts, traditions, arguments&amp;rdquo;, Communication Theory,&amp;nbsp;23 (3), 191-202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Couldry, N. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Digital storytelling, media research and democracy: conceptual choices and alternative futures&amp;rdquo;, Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: self-representations in new media. Digital formations, (52), 41-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Couldry, N., Hepp, A. (2017), The mediated construction of reality,&amp;nbsp;Polity Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Dyck, J. van (2013), The Culture of Connectivity,&amp;nbsp;A Critical History of Social Media, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Ferreira, J. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Midiatiza&amp;ccedil;&amp;atilde;o: Dispositivos, processos sociais e de comunica&amp;ccedil;&amp;atilde;o&amp;rdquo;, Revista E-Compos,&amp;nbsp;(1), 1-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Gomes, P. G. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Midiatiza&amp;ccedil;&amp;atilde;o: Um conceito, m&amp;uacute;ltiplas vozes&amp;rdquo;, Relatos de Investigaciones Sobre Mediatizaciones,&amp;nbsp;33-54</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Hall, S. (1997), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices,&amp;nbsp;Sage Publications, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Hepp, A. (2013), Cultures of mediatization,&amp;nbsp;Polity Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Hepp, A. (2020), Deep mediatization,&amp;nbsp;Routledge, London and New York:</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Hepp, A., Krotz, F. (2014), Mediatized Worlds &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp;Understanding Everyday Mediatization, Mediatized Worlds.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Hjarvard, S. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Three Forms of Mediatized Religion Changing the Public Face of Religion&amp;rdquo;, Mediatization&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;Religion.&amp;nbsp;Nordic&amp;nbsp;Perspectives, 21-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Hjarvard, S. (2013), The Mediatization of Culture and Society,&amp;nbsp;Routledge, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Hjarvard, S. (2008), &amp;ldquo;The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change&amp;rdquo;, Nordicom Review, 29 (2), 105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Hjarvard, S. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The Logics of the Media and the Mediatized Conditions of Social Interaction&amp;rdquo;, Media Logic(s) Revisited: Modelling the Interplay Between Media Institutions, Media Technology and Societal Change, 63-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. (2011), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, Verso, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Livingstone, S.&amp;nbsp;M. (2009), &amp;ldquo;On the mediation of everything&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Communication, 59 (1), 1-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Meyrowitz, J. (1986), No Sense of Place. The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, Oxford University Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Silverstone, R. (2005), The Sociology of Mediation and Communication, The Sage Handbook of Sociology.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Silverstone, R. (1994), Television and Everyday Life,&amp;nbsp;Routledge, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Stahle H. (2021), Russian Church in the Digital Era Mediatization of Orthodoxy, Routledge, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Str&amp;ouml;mb&amp;auml;ck, J. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics&amp;rdquo;, The International Journal of Press/Politics,&amp;nbsp;13 (3), 228-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Sundar, S. S., Limperos, A. M. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57 (4), 504-525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Valdettaro, S. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Mediatizaciones: Hacia la consolidaci&amp;oacute;n de un campo de estudios&amp;rdquo;, Inmediaciones de la Comunicaci&amp;oacute;n, (11), 21-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Webster, J. G. (2014), The marketplace of attention,&amp;nbsp;How audiences take shape in a digital age, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>