<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2025-11-2-0-1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3778</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;From the study of religious &amp;ldquo;nones&amp;rdquo; to the development&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;of the sociology of &amp;ldquo;non-religion&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;From the study of religious &amp;ldquo;nones&amp;rdquo; to the development&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;of the sociology of &amp;ldquo;non-religion&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bogdan</surname><given-names>Sergey Сергеевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bogdan</surname><given-names>Sergey</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2025/2/4-21_Bogdan_S_S.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>To understand the modern religious situation and the whole palette of worldviews and pluralism, it is necessary not to limit oneself only to traditional and non-traditional religious views. Non-religiosity is such a poorly studied and constantly growing part of the religious landscape that it deserves no less attention. The article presents the stages of formation, development, and legitimation of &amp;ldquo;non-religion&amp;rdquo; in the West as a new field of study of non-religiosity, in all its complexity, dynamism and diversity. The article shows the signs of institutionalization of non-religion and &amp;ldquo;differentiation&amp;rdquo; of its subject and examines the concepts of the founders of the new subfield &amp;ndash; L. Lee, S. Bullivant and J. Quack. Non-religion focuses on different types of interaction between the religious and non-religious, accumulates the comprehension of different levels and elements of non-religiosity, unbelief, and secularity in the aspect of beliefs, behavior, experience and belonging. The widespread growth and specificity of non-religious identities (having no identity, non-religious, having no religion, unaffiliated) are analyzed. Both standard substantial-binary approaches to the study of non-religion and alternative ones &amp;ndash; relational and worldview &amp;ndash; are considered. Interpretations of non-religious phenomena are presented through the prism of the concepts of the rise, decline and transformation of religiosity (secularization, desecularization, postsecularity). The trends of the last two decades have been symbioses of patchwork, fuzzy and unstable forms of individual religiosity and non-religiosity with an emphasis on the free pluralistic search for new secular-spiritual beliefs, practices, and identities.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>To understand the modern religious situation and the whole palette of worldviews and pluralism, it is necessary not to limit oneself only to traditional and non-traditional religious views. Non-religiosity is such a poorly studied and constantly growing part of the religious landscape that it deserves no less attention. The article presents the stages of formation, development, and legitimation of &amp;ldquo;non-religion&amp;rdquo; in the West as a new field of study of non-religiosity, in all its complexity, dynamism and diversity. The article shows the signs of institutionalization of non-religion and &amp;ldquo;differentiation&amp;rdquo; of its subject and examines the concepts of the founders of the new subfield &amp;ndash; L. Lee, S. Bullivant and J. Quack. Non-religion focuses on different types of interaction between the religious and non-religious, accumulates the comprehension of different levels and elements of non-religiosity, unbelief, and secularity in the aspect of beliefs, behavior, experience and belonging. The widespread growth and specificity of non-religious identities (having no identity, non-religious, having no religion, unaffiliated) are analyzed. Both standard substantial-binary approaches to the study of non-religion and alternative ones &amp;ndash; relational and worldview &amp;ndash; are considered. Interpretations of non-religious phenomena are presented through the prism of the concepts of the rise, decline and transformation of religiosity (secularization, desecularization, postsecularity). The trends of the last two decades have been symbioses of patchwork, fuzzy and unstable forms of individual religiosity and non-religiosity with an emphasis on the free pluralistic search for new secular-spiritual beliefs, practices, and identities.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>non-religion (irreligion)</kwd><kwd>non-religiosity</kwd><kwd>non-religious identity</kwd><kwd>unbelief</kwd><kwd>“nones”</kwd><kwd>“no religion”</kwd><kwd>“not affiliated”</kwd><kwd>secularization</kwd><kwd>individualization</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>non-religion (irreligion)</kwd><kwd>non-religiosity</kwd><kwd>non-religious identity</kwd><kwd>unbelief</kwd><kwd>“nones”</kwd><kwd>“no religion”</kwd><kwd>“not affiliated”</kwd><kwd>secularization</kwd><kwd>individualization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Inglhart, R. (2022), Neozhidanny upadok religioznosti v razvityh stranah&amp;nbsp;[Religion&amp;#39;s Sudden Decline: What&amp;#39;s Causing it, and What Comes Next?], transl. by N. Firsova, EUSP Press, St. Petersburg, Russia, 238. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Rutkevich, E. D. (2020), &amp;ldquo;&amp;laquo;Religion&amp;raquo;, &amp;laquo;no religion&amp;raquo; and &amp;laquo;spirituality&amp;raquo; of the &amp;laquo;nones&amp;raquo; issues of definition and study&amp;rdquo;, Research Result. Sociology and management, 6 (3), 29-48, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-3-0-2.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Baker, J. O. B., Smith, B. G. (2009), &amp;ldquo;None Too Simple: Examining Issues of Religious Nonbelief and nonbelonging in the United States&amp;rdquo;, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48 (4), 719-733.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Balazka, D. (2020), Mapping Religious Nones in 112 Countries: An Overview of European Values Study and World Values Survey Data (1981&amp;ndash;2020), Trento: Fondazione Bruno Kessler, 51, [Online], available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344176211_Mapping_Religious_Nones_in_112_Countries_An_Overview_of_European_Values_Study_and_World_Values_Survey_Data_1981-2020&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 4 February 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Berger, P. L. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Further Thoughts on Religion and Modernity&amp;rdquo;, Society, 49 (4), 313-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Bruce, S. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Secularization and the Impotence of Individualized Religion&amp;rdquo;, The Hedgehog Review, 8 (1-2), 34-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Bullivant, S. and Lee, L. (2016), The Oxford Dictionary of Atheism.&amp;nbsp;Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780191816819.001.0001.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Bullivant, S., Farias, M., Lanman, J. and Lee, L. &amp;nbsp;(2019), Understanding Unbelief: Atheists and agnostics around the world, St Mary&amp;rsquo;s University Twickenham, London [Online], available at: https://www.stmarys.ac.uk/research/centres/benedict-xvi/docs/benedict-centre-understanding-unbelief-report.pdf&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 22 February 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Bullivant, S. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Explaining the Rise of &amp;ldquo;Non-religion Studies&amp;rdquo;: Subfield Formation and Institutionalization within the Sociology of Religion&amp;rdquo;, Social Compass, 67 (1), 86-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Campbell, C. (1971), Toward a Sociology of Irreligion,&amp;nbsp;New Perspectives in Sociology, Red Globe Press, London, 171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Catto, R., Riley, Ja., Elsdon-Baker F., Jones, S.H., Leicht, C. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Science, religion, and non-religion: Engaging subdisciplines to move further beyond mythbusting&amp;rdquo;, Acta Sociologica, &amp;nbsp;66(1), 96-110, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993221116248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Coleman, TJ, III, Silver, CF and Holcombe, J. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Focusing on horizontal transcendence: Much more than a &amp;ldquo;&amp;#39;non-belief&amp;#39;&amp;rdquo;&amp;rdquo;, Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 21 (2), 1-18, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v21i2.1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Cotter, C. (2020), The Critical Study of Non-religion: Discourse, Identification and Locality&amp;nbsp;(Bloomsbury Advances in Religious Studies). Bloomsbury Publishing, 264, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350095274.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Cragun, R.T., and McCaffree K. J. (2021), &amp;ldquo;Nothing Is Not Something: On Replacing Non-religion with Identities&amp;rdquo;, Secular Studies, 3 (1), 7-26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25892525-bja10017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Davie, G. (2000), Religion in Modern Europe. A Memory Mutates,&amp;nbsp;Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198280651.001.0001.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Glenn, N. D. (1987), &amp;ldquo;The Trend in &amp;ldquo;No Religion&amp;rdquo; Respondents to U. S. National Surveys, Late 1959s to Early 1980s&amp;rdquo;, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(3), 293-314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Hagstr&amp;ouml;m, J., Copeman Ja. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Clarification and Disposal as Key Concepts in the Anthropology of Non-religion&amp;rdquo;, Religion and Society, 14 (1), 184-197, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2023.070307.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Heelas, P. (1996), The New Age Movements. The Celebration of the Self and the Sacralization of Modernity, Oxford: Blackwell, 288.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Hout, M. and Smith, T. W. (2015), Fewer Americans Affiliate with Organized Religions, Beliefs and Practice Unchanged: Key Findings from the 2014 General Social Survey, [Online], available at: https://www.norc.org/content/dam/norc-org/pdfs/GSS_Religion_2014.pdf&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 22 January 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Hout, M. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Religious Ambivalence, Liminality and the Increase of No Religious Preference in the United States, 2006-2014&amp;rdquo;, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56 (1), 52-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>J&amp;auml;rnefelt, E. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Beneath the Surface: A Critique of the Common Survey Model in the Study of Non-religion&amp;rdquo;, Secularism and Non-religion, 9 (4), 1-9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.106&amp;nbsp;.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Jong, J. (2015), &amp;ldquo;On (not) defining (non)religion&amp;rdquo;, Science, Religion and Culture, 2 (3), 15-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Kasselstrand, I., Zuckerman, P. and Cragun, R. (2023), Beyond Doubt: The Secularization of Society,&amp;nbsp;NYU Press, 240, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479814305.001.0001.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Key Findings From the Global Religious Futures Project (2022), Pew Research Center, [Online], available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/12/21/key-findings-from-the-global-religious-futures-project/&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 21 February 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Knoblauch, H. (2003), &amp;ldquo;Europe and Invisible Religion&amp;rdquo;, Social Compass, 50&amp;nbsp;(3), 267-274.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Lee, L. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Glossary NSRN&amp;rdquo;, Virtual Conference: Non-Religion and Secularity Research Network (May 27), 1-4,&amp;nbsp;[Online], available at: https://thensrn.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/nsrn-glossary-28-aprl-2011-lois-lee1.pdf&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 12 January 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Lee, L. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Research Note: Talking about a Revolution: Terminology for the New Field of Non-Religion Studies&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27 (1), 129-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Lee, L. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Introduction: Resuming a Sociology of Irreligion&amp;rdquo;, In: Toward a Sociology of Irreligion, Palgrave, London, 1-16, DOI:&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00795-0_1.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Lee, L. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic &amp;lsquo;not religious&amp;rsquo; categories and populations&amp;rdquo;, Religion, 44&amp;nbsp;(3), 466-482, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2014.904035.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Lee, L. (2015), Recognizing the Non-religious: Reimagining the Secular, Oxford University Press, 248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;Lee, L. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The non-religious&amp;rdquo;, Religion Media Centre, [Online], available at: https://religionmediacentre.org.uk/factsheets/the-nonreligious/&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 11 February 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Levin, J. Bandsaw, M., Johnson, B. R. and Stark, R. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Are Religious &amp;ldquo;Nones&amp;rdquo; Really Not Religious?: Revisiting Glenn, Three Decades Later&amp;rdquo;, Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 18, Article 7, [Online], available at: https://www.baylorisr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2022-IJRR-Are-Religious-Nones-Really-Not-Religious.pdf&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 11 February 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Lewis, J.R. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Education, Irreligion, and Non-religion: Evidence from Select Anglophone Census Data&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 30 (2), 265-272.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Nikitaki, S. (2022), &amp;ldquo;The Place of Non-religion in Theology and Religious Studies: Issues and Insights from Empirical Research with Scholars of Religion&amp;rdquo;, Non-religion in Late Modern Societies, Springer, 209-227, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92395-2_12.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Podolinsk&amp;aacute;, T., Majo J. (2022), &amp;ldquo;How to Approach (Non)Religion and Labelling Categories that Continue to be Fuzzy (Theoretical and Numerical Take Off.)&amp;rdquo;, Slovensk&amp;yacute; n&amp;aacute;rodopis, 70 (4), 447-474, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/SN.2022.4.37.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Quack, J. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Modes of Non-religiosity&amp;rdquo;, Virtual Conference: Terminology for Non-religion and Secularity Research, [Online], available at: https://thensrn.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/nsrn-terminology-conference-5-may-2011-johannes-quack-non-religion-stream1.pdf&amp;nbsp;(Accessed&amp;nbsp;12 January 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Quack, J. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Outline of a Relational Approach to &amp;lsquo;Non-religion&amp;rsquo;&amp;rdquo;, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 26 (4-5), 439-469.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Quack, J., Schuh, C. and Kind, S. (2019), The Diversity of Non-religion: Normativities and Contested Relations, Routledge, London, 196, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196799.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Quack, J., Schulz, M. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Who Counts as &amp;lsquo;None&amp;rsquo;?&amp;rdquo;, Religion and Society, 14 (1), 126-139, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2023.070303.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Religiously unaffiliated people face harassment in a growing number of countries (2023), Pew Research Center, [Online], available at https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/01/27/religiously-unaffiliated-people-face-harassment-in-a-growing-number-of-countries/&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 21 February 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;Ramey, S. and Miller, M.R. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Meaningless Surveys: The Faulty &amp;#39;Mathematics&amp;#39; of the &amp;#39;Nones&amp;#39;&amp;rdquo;, Huffpost, [Online], available at: &amp;nbsp;https://www.huffpost.com/entry/meaningless-surveys-the-f_b_4225306&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 16 January 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Skrzypek, Ja. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Non-religion jako kategoria relacjonalna&amp;rdquo;, Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 68&amp;nbsp;(3), 53-79, DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/kis.2024.68.3.3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Schwadel, P., Hardy, S. A., Van Tongeren, D. R. and DeWall, C. N. (2021), &amp;ldquo;The values of religious nones, dones, and sacralized Americans: Links between changes in religious affiliation and Schwartz values&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Personality, 89, 867-882.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><mixed-citation>Taves, A. (2018), &amp;ldquo;What is Non-religion? On the Virtues of a Meaning Systems Framework for Studying Nonreligious and Religious Worldviews in the Context of Everyday Life&amp;rdquo;, Secularism and Non-religion, 7 (1), 9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.104.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><mixed-citation>Tromp, P., Kulkova, A. and Houtman, D. (2020), Note: Religious Decline or Religious</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><mixed-citation>Change? Evidence from Thirteen Western-European Countries (1981-2008), [Online], available at: https://www.dickhoutman.nl/mediatheek/files/tromp_et_al._2019.pdf&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 16 February 2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><mixed-citation>Vernon, G. M. (1968), &amp;ldquo;The Religious &amp;ldquo;Nones&amp;rdquo; a Neglected Category&amp;rdquo;, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 7 (2), 219-229.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><mixed-citation>Voas, D., McAndrew, S. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Three Puzzles of Non-religion in Britain&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27 (1), 29-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><mixed-citation>Voas, D. (2015), &amp;ldquo;The Normalization of Non-Religion: A reply to James Lewis&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 30 (3), 505-508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><mixed-citation>Wilkins-Laflamme, S. (2015), &amp;ldquo;How Unreligious Are the Religious &amp;ldquo;Nones&amp;rdquo;. Religious dynamics of the Unaffiliated in Canada&amp;rdquo;, Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 40 (4), 477-500.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><mixed-citation>Wohlrab-Sahr, M. and Kaden, T. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Exploring the Non-Religious: Societal Norms, Attitudes and Identities, Arenas of Conflict&amp;rdquo;, Archives de Sciences Sociales Des Religions, 167, 105-125, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/assr.26145.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>