<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2025-11-1-1-6</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3723</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Techniques for countering fake news&amp;nbsp;in regional society: what strengthens trust&amp;nbsp;in the post-truth era?&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Techniques for countering fake news&amp;nbsp;in regional society: what strengthens trust&amp;nbsp;in the post-truth era?&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ushkin</surname><given-names>Sergey Геннадьевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ushkin</surname><given-names>Sergey</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ushkinsergey@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Scientific Center for Social and Economic Monitoring bld. 39a, B. Khmelnitskogo St., Saransk, 430005, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2025/1/Социология_и_управление_1_2025-247-262.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Relevance.&amp;nbsp;The article is devoted to studying the role and extent of the spread of fakes in modern society. They are interpreted as a threat to the security of the information space. In addition, the focus of the study is on the practices of identifying this kind of destructive content, considered at the legal, contextual and technological levels. Scientific problem.&amp;nbsp;Countering false information seems important in the context of military and information confrontation between Russia and the collective West. It is emphasized that the consequences of the influence of fakes on individuals can be prolonged over time, largely mediated by their development of critical thinking and information hygiene. Methods.&amp;nbsp;The empirical basis of this study was the results of a mass representative sociological survey conducted by the author in April-May 2024 among the population of the Republic of Mordovia (n=1,000). In addition, they were supplemented with measurement data from the Scientific Center for Socio-Economic Monitoring, carried out in the same region using a similar methodology, but with a smaller sample size (n=374). The article pays special attention to the data obtained through open-ended questions, which were codified and formed the basis for countering fake news. Research results. The results obtained during the study allow us to conclude that there is a high level of awareness of the population about fakes. This indirectly confirms the significance of their perception in the public consciousness. It was also revealed that every second person surveyed had been exposed to this kind of destructive content over the past month. At the same time, three out of ten respondents over the past year have believed false information at least once, and two out of ten shared it with their immediate circle. Information hygiene practices can be assessed as relatively undeveloped; only one in seven regularly evaluates incoming information before telling their friends, acquaintances or relatives about it. Conclusions.&amp;nbsp;Based on the respondents&amp;rsquo; experience in detecting fake news, three main techniques were identified that allow one to distinguish false information from reliable information: firstly, it is necessary to evaluate the source where this or that content was posted &amp;ndash; is it authoritative and of high quality; secondly, it is necessary to search for it in other sources, primarily official ones &amp;ndash; if this is not stated anywhere, then there is a high probability that the information received is unreliable; thirdly, it is important to try to determine whether the authors publish their material in a neutral context, or are trying to evoke emotions in the audience, and in some cases, even simulate affective actions &amp;ndash; in this case, the facts, not the presentation of the material, become fundamentally significant.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Relevance.&amp;nbsp;The article is devoted to studying the role and extent of the spread of fakes in modern society. They are interpreted as a threat to the security of the information space. In addition, the focus of the study is on the practices of identifying this kind of destructive content, considered at the legal, contextual and technological levels. Scientific problem.&amp;nbsp;Countering false information seems important in the context of military and information confrontation between Russia and the collective West. It is emphasized that the consequences of the influence of fakes on individuals can be prolonged over time, largely mediated by their development of critical thinking and information hygiene. Methods.&amp;nbsp;The empirical basis of this study was the results of a mass representative sociological survey conducted by the author in April-May 2024 among the population of the Republic of Mordovia (n=1,000). In addition, they were supplemented with measurement data from the Scientific Center for Socio-Economic Monitoring, carried out in the same region using a similar methodology, but with a smaller sample size (n=374). The article pays special attention to the data obtained through open-ended questions, which were codified and formed the basis for countering fake news. Research results. The results obtained during the study allow us to conclude that there is a high level of awareness of the population about fakes. This indirectly confirms the significance of their perception in the public consciousness. It was also revealed that every second person surveyed had been exposed to this kind of destructive content over the past month. At the same time, three out of ten respondents over the past year have believed false information at least once, and two out of ten shared it with their immediate circle. Information hygiene practices can be assessed as relatively undeveloped; only one in seven regularly evaluates incoming information before telling their friends, acquaintances or relatives about it. Conclusions.&amp;nbsp;Based on the respondents&amp;rsquo; experience in detecting fake news, three main techniques were identified that allow one to distinguish false information from reliable information: firstly, it is necessary to evaluate the source where this or that content was posted &amp;ndash; is it authoritative and of high quality; secondly, it is necessary to search for it in other sources, primarily official ones &amp;ndash; if this is not stated anywhere, then there is a high probability that the information received is unreliable; thirdly, it is important to try to determine whether the authors publish their material in a neutral context, or are trying to evoke emotions in the audience, and in some cases, even simulate affective actions &amp;ndash; in this case, the facts, not the presentation of the material, become fundamentally significant.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>fakes</kwd><kwd>trust</kwd><kwd>mistrust</kwd><kwd>information hygiene</kwd><kwd>critical thinking</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>fakes</kwd><kwd>trust</kwd><kwd>mistrust</kwd><kwd>information hygiene</kwd><kwd>critical thinking</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>The work was prepared within the framework of the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 227800082, https://rscf.ru/project/22-78-00082 /. The author expresses gratitude to the Administration of the Head of the Republic of Mordovia and the Government of the Republic of Mordovia, the National Research Mordovian State University and the Scientific Center for Socio-Economic Monitoring for their assistance in organizing the field stage of the study.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bergstrom,&amp;nbsp;C., West,&amp;nbsp;J. (2022), Polny bred! Skeptitsizm v mire bolshih dannyh&amp;nbsp;[Calling bullshit: the art of skepticism in a data-driven world], Mann, Ivanov and Ferber,&amp;nbsp;Moscow, Russia.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bogoslovskaya,&amp;nbsp;V. R., Sharkov,&amp;nbsp;F. I. (2021), &amp;ldquo;The phenomenon of fake news: a review of recent research&amp;rdquo;, Kommunikologiya: elektronny nauchny zhurnal,&amp;nbsp;6(3),&amp;nbsp;111-118.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Ilchenko,&amp;nbsp;S. N.&amp;nbsp;(2015), &amp;ldquo;Fake as a political format in modern media environment,&amp;nbsp;Gumanitarny vektor, (3),&amp;nbsp;98-101. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Kazakov,&amp;nbsp;A.A. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Media literacy within the context of political culture: revisiting the definition of the term&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, (4),&amp;nbsp;78-97. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Mikhailova,&amp;nbsp;E. A. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Trust, distrust and fake news in the process of political legitimization&amp;rdquo;, Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya,&amp;nbsp;23(2),&amp;nbsp;227-234,&amp;nbsp;DOI: 10.18500/1818-9601-2023-23-2-227-234.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Onufrienko,&amp;nbsp;A. A. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Procedures of struggle against a fake news. experience of the west2, &amp;nbsp;Svobodnaya mysl, (2),&amp;nbsp;159-175. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Puzanova,  Zh. &amp;nbsp;V., Filippov,  V.&amp;nbsp;M., Larina, T.  I., Simonova, M.  A. (2023), &amp;ldquo;On the study of factors of fake news perception by mass audience (case study of student youth)&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii, 14 (4),&amp;nbsp;128-146, DOI: 10.19181/vis.2023.14.4.8.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Habermas,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;(2023), Novaya strukturnaya transformatsiya publichnoy sfery i deliberativnaya politika&amp;nbsp;[New structural transformation of the public sphere and deliberative politics], New literary review, Moscow, Russia,&amp;nbsp;104.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Iakoba,&amp;nbsp; I.  A. (2023), &amp;ldquo;The constructed and the real in mediatization: interpretation of the Second World War by the West and Russia, Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii, 14 (4),&amp;nbsp;93-111, DOI: 10.19181/vis.2023.14.4.6. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>A&amp;iuml;meur,&amp;nbsp;E., Amri,&amp;nbsp;S., Brassard,&amp;nbsp;G. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review&amp;rdquo;, Social Network Analysis and Mining,&amp;nbsp;13 (3),&amp;nbsp;13-30, DOI: 10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Allcott,&amp;nbsp;H., Gentzkow,&amp;nbsp;M. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Social media and fake news in the 2016 Election&amp;rdquo;, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2),&amp;nbsp;211-235, DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Baptista,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;P., Gradim,&amp;nbsp;A. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review&amp;rdquo;, Social Sciences,&amp;nbsp;9 (10), 185, DOI: 10.3390/socsci9100185.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Edgerly,&amp;nbsp;S., Mour&amp;atilde;o,&amp;nbsp;R. R., Thorson,&amp;nbsp;E., Tham,&amp;nbsp;S. M. (2020), &amp;ldquo;When Do Audiences Verify? How Perceptions About Message and Source Influence Audience Verification of News Headlines&amp;rdquo;, Journalism &amp;amp; Mass Communication Quarterly, 97 (1),&amp;nbsp;52-71, DOI: 10.1177/1077699019864680.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Flynn,&amp;nbsp;D. J., Nyhan,&amp;nbsp;B., &amp;amp; Reifler,&amp;nbsp;J. (2017), &amp;ldquo;The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Political Psychology, 38 (S1),&amp;nbsp;127-150, DOI: 10.1111/pops.12394</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Grinberg,&amp;nbsp;N., Joseph,&amp;nbsp;K., Friedland,&amp;nbsp;L., Swire-Thompson,&amp;nbsp;B., Lazer,&amp;nbsp;D. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Science, 363 (6425), 374-378. DOI:10.1126/science.aau2706.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Guess,&amp;nbsp;A., Nagler,&amp;nbsp;J., Tucker,&amp;nbsp;J. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Science Advances, 5&amp;nbsp;(1), DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Guess,&amp;nbsp;A. M, Lerner,&amp;nbsp;M., Lyons,&amp;nbsp;B., Montgomery,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;M., Nyhan,&amp;nbsp;B., Reifler,&amp;nbsp;J., Sircar,&amp;nbsp;N. (2020), &amp;ldquo;A&amp;nbsp;digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India&amp;rdquo;, PNAS, 117 (27), 15536-15545, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920498117.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Lazer,&amp;nbsp;D. M., Baum,&amp;nbsp;M. A., Benkler,&amp;nbsp;Y., Berinsky,&amp;nbsp;A. J., Greenhill,&amp;nbsp;K. M., Menczer,&amp;nbsp;F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan,&amp;nbsp;B., Pennycook,&amp;nbsp;G., Rothschild,&amp;nbsp;D. M., Schudson,&amp;nbsp;M., Sloman,&amp;nbsp;S. A., Sunstein,&amp;nbsp;C. R., Thorson,&amp;nbsp;E. A., Watts,&amp;nbsp;D. J., Zittrain,&amp;nbsp;J. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The science of fake news&amp;rdquo;, Science, 359(6380),&amp;nbsp;1094-1096, DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Mercier,&amp;nbsp;H., Boudry,&amp;nbsp;M., Paglieri,&amp;nbsp;F., Trouche,&amp;nbsp;E. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Natural-Born Arguers: Teaching How to Make the Best of Our Reasoning Abilities&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Educational Psychologist, 52 (1),&amp;nbsp;1-16, DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207537.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Metzger,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;J., Hartsell,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;H., Flanagin,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;(2020),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News&amp;rdquo;, Communication Research, 47&amp;nbsp;(1),&amp;nbsp;3-28, DOI: 10.1177/0093650215613136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Olan,&amp;nbsp;F., Yayawickrama,&amp;nbsp;U., Arakpogun,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;O. Suklan,&amp;nbsp;J., Liu,&amp;nbsp;Sh. (2022), Fake News on Social Media: the Impact on Society, Information Systems Frontiers,&amp;nbsp;DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10242-z.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Vosoughi,&amp;nbsp;S., Roy,&amp;nbsp;D., Aral,&amp;nbsp;S. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The spread of true and false news online&amp;rdquo;, Science, 359(6380),&amp;nbsp;1146-1151, DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.1126/science.aap9559.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>