<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2015-1-2-22-28</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">356</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>REFLECTION OF HUMAN DIGNITY FROM THE DESCRIPTIVE TO THE CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>REFLECTION OF HUMAN DIGNITY FROM THE DESCRIPTIVE TO THE CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Myakchilo</surname><given-names>Stepan Antonovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Myakchilo</surname><given-names>Stepan Antonovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>velwetowl@gmail.com</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2015/2/22-28.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>One of the most significant achievements of the «anthropological turn» of XIX-XX centuries philosophy, as well as of modern sociology, law and other disciplines is the development of the idea and images of human dignity as a value-ideological foundation of social development, a tool to cope with and manage conflicts in the society. Implicit contradictions of modern concepts of human dignity (undeveloped nature of dignity, mixing up the dignity and the assessment of merits, the primacy of the activity approach, etc.) hinder the implementation of the principle of dignity as a regulator of social practice. We need a new theory of dignity (may call it constructive theory), which is expected to replace the descriptive approach and aims to synthesize the idea and images of human dignity into a single value-rational and emotional complex supported by the mechanism of self-consciousness of the individual and the human community, and by the reflection of dignity.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>One of the most significant achievements of the «anthropological turn» of XIX-XX centuries philosophy, as well as of modern sociology, law and other disciplines is the development of the idea and images of human dignity as a value-ideological foundation of social development, a tool to cope with and manage conflicts in the society. Implicit contradictions of modern concepts of human dignity (undeveloped nature of dignity, mixing up the dignity and the assessment of merits, the primacy of the activity approach, etc.) hinder the implementation of the principle of dignity as a regulator of social practice. We need a new theory of dignity (may call it constructive theory), which is expected to replace the descriptive approach and aims to synthesize the idea and images of human dignity into a single value-rational and emotional complex supported by the mechanism of self-consciousness of the individual and the human community, and by the reflection of dignity.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>human dignity</kwd><kwd>activity approach</kwd><kwd>descriptive theory of human dignity</kwd><kwd>constructive theory of human dignity</kwd><kwd>self-perception</kwd><kwd>introspection</kwd><kwd>self-understanding</kwd><kwd>reflection of dignity</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>human dignity</kwd><kwd>activity approach</kwd><kwd>descriptive theory of human dignity</kwd><kwd>constructive theory of human dignity</kwd><kwd>self-perception</kwd><kwd>introspection</kwd><kwd>self-understanding</kwd><kwd>reflection of dignity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bikbov А. Philosophical Dignity as an Object of Study // Logos. 2004. №&amp;nbsp;3-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Rosen M. Dignity, its History and Meaning. Harward University Press, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Apresian R. Dignity // New Philosophic Encyclopedia: In 4 volumes / Ed. by. V. Stiopin, A. Huseinov, A. Ogurtsov, G. Semigin. М., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Maslow А. Self-Actualization // Psychology of Personality. Texts. М., 1982.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Stolovich, L.N. Kant on the problem of value // Kantian collection. 2009. №&amp;nbsp;2. Pp. 20-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Kant I. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals / Works: in 8 vol. V. 4. М., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Statement of Ethical Principles // International Federation of Social Workers [Electronic resource]. &amp;ndash; URL: http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles (date of access: March 14, 2015)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Darwall S. Honor, History, and Relationship: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics II. Oxford Scholarship Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Heidegger M. Letter on Humanism // Problem of the Human in Western Philosophy: Translations / Comp. and afterword by P.S. Gurevich; tot. ed. Yu.P. Popov. М., 1988.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Prusak А.I. Personal Dignity in Sociological Discourse // Socis. 2006. №&amp;nbsp;7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Young М. The Rise of the Meritocracy // Utopia and utopic consciousness / Comp. and tot. ed. V.A. Chalikova. М., 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Kustariov A. Meritocracy and Democracy // Emergency store [= Неприкосновенный запас]. 2013. №1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Waldron J., Dan-Cohen M. Dignity, Rank and Rights. Oxford Scholarship Press, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Kovalyov А.А. Value and Dignity of Person &amp;ndash; Philosophic and Legal Basis of Human Rights and Freedoms // Science and education: economy; business, law and management. 2011. № 2 [Electronic resource]. &amp;ndash; URL: http://www.journalnio.com/ index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=1097&amp;amp;Itemid=114. (date of access: March 14, 2015)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Stolin V.N. Personal self-consciousness. М., 1983 [Electronic resource]. &amp;ndash; URL: http://psylib.org.ua/ books/ stolv01/ txt10.htm. (date of access: March 14, 2015)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>