<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-2-0-8.</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3125</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIAL STRUCTURE, SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND PROCESSES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Post-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ecularism in &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;m&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;odern Russia: dangers and prospects&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Post-&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ecularism in &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;m&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;odern Russia: dangers and prospects&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Denisova</surname><given-names>Lyubov Владиленовна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Denisova</surname><given-names>Lyubov</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>lvladilen@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Morozov</surname><given-names>Andrey Анатольевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Morozov</surname><given-names>Andrey</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>moroz_may@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Omsk Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation,</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2023/2/Денисова_Морозов.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article is based on the discussion of the concepts of &amp;quot;post-secular society&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;post-secularism&amp;quot; discussed in the social sciences and the possibility of their use for analyzing the processes taking place in modern Russian society. A number of serious Russian scientists, researchers of religious processes, express objections to the use of the concepts of &amp;quot;post-secular society&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;post-secularism&amp;quot;, considering the ongoing processes to be a continuation of secularization. Analyzing their arguments, the authors come to the conclusion that there is no reason to talk about the existence of a post-secular society in modern Russia. However, post-secularism as a communicative phenomenon with a normative perspective is quite an actual and empirically verifiable concept. Such fixed phenomena as reconfiguration, demarginalization of religion, interfaith competition, interfaith cooperation are new forms of public relations that cannot be evaluated as the results of either secularization or desecularization. The emergence of postsecular quality of communication creates conditions for the establishment of fundamentally new forms of relations between various ideological groups, as well as for the transformation of state-confessional relations. The formation of post-secular public relations creates both dangers and new prospects. The dangers are connected with the contradictions arising in connection with the return of religion to the public environment. Thus, the reconfiguration may threaten the clericalization of public life. At the same time, the demarginalization of religion is a condition for public dialogue between representatives of different ideological positions.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is based on the discussion of the concepts of &amp;quot;post-secular society&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;post-secularism&amp;quot; discussed in the social sciences and the possibility of their use for analyzing the processes taking place in modern Russian society. A number of serious Russian scientists, researchers of religious processes, express objections to the use of the concepts of &amp;quot;post-secular society&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;post-secularism&amp;quot;, considering the ongoing processes to be a continuation of secularization. Analyzing their arguments, the authors come to the conclusion that there is no reason to talk about the existence of a post-secular society in modern Russia. However, post-secularism as a communicative phenomenon with a normative perspective is quite an actual and empirically verifiable concept. Such fixed phenomena as reconfiguration, demarginalization of religion, interfaith competition, interfaith cooperation are new forms of public relations that cannot be evaluated as the results of either secularization or desecularization. The emergence of postsecular quality of communication creates conditions for the establishment of fundamentally new forms of relations between various ideological groups, as well as for the transformation of state-confessional relations. The formation of post-secular public relations creates both dangers and new prospects. The dangers are connected with the contradictions arising in connection with the return of religion to the public environment. Thus, the reconfiguration may threaten the clericalization of public life. At the same time, the demarginalization of religion is a condition for public dialogue between representatives of different ideological positions.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>religion</kwd><kwd>secularism</kwd><kwd>post-secular society</kwd><kwd>secularization</kwd><kwd>religious organizations</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>religion</kwd><kwd>secularism</kwd><kwd>post-secular society</kwd><kwd>secularization</kwd><kwd>religious organizations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Kasanova, J. (2018),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Thinking about the post-secular: three meanings of &amp;ldquo;secular&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;and three possibilities of going beyond it&amp;rdquo;, State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, (4), 143-174.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2018-36-4-143-174.&amp;nbsp;(in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Antonov, K., Pol&amp;rsquo;skov, K., Smirnov, M. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Secularisation and post-secularity (on the discussion about the modern conceptual framework of religious studies)&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I: Bogoslovie. Filosofi ia. Religiovedenie, 105, 138-154, DOI: 10.15382/sturI2023105.138-154. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Andreeva, L.&amp;nbsp;A., Andreeva, L.&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;(2015), &amp;ldquo;Secular or post-secular world: verifying conceptions&amp;rdquo;, Sociological Studies, (3), 82-88. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Minchenko, T.&amp;nbsp;P. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Religion, freedom of conscience and new technologies in the post-secular world&amp;rdquo;, Bulletin Polytechnic University, 321(6), 147-151. (In</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Eco, U. (2004), Martini, Cardinal. Dialog o vere i neverii&amp;nbsp;[Dialogue about Faith and Unbelief], St. Andrew&amp;#39;s bible and theological institute, Moscow, Russia, 119. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Habermas, J. (2008),&amp;nbsp;A &amp;ldquo;post-secular&amp;rdquo; society &amp;ndash; what does that mean?&amp;nbsp;(16 September 2008) [Online], available at: https://www.resetdoc.org/story/a-post-secular-society-what-does-that-mean/&amp;nbsp;(Accessed&amp;nbsp;22 October 2022).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Habermas, J. (2002), Budushhee chelovecheskoj prirody`: na puti k liberal`noj evgenike&amp;nbsp;[The future of human nature: towards liberal eugenics], Publishing House &amp;ldquo;The Whole World&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Moscow, Russia, 143.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Vertiy, M.&amp;nbsp;Yu.&amp;nbsp;(2006), &amp;ldquo;The political dimension of state-confessional relations&amp;rdquo;, Philosophy of Law,&amp;nbsp;(2), 70-74. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Bogatyrev, D.&amp;nbsp;K., Shishkova, M.&amp;nbsp;I. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Postsecular hypothesis and features of Russian postsecularity&amp;rdquo;, Journal of the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities,&amp;nbsp;16 (3), 95-109.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Tsyplakov, D.&amp;nbsp;A. (2015),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;The Structures of Russian Post-secularism in the Life-world of Our Contemporaries&amp;rdquo;, Journal of the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities,&amp;nbsp;16 (3), 110-121.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Quenoy, I., Dubrovskiy, D. (2023), Violence and the defense of &amp;laquo;traditional values&amp;raquo; [Online], available at: https://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep22453.8&amp;nbsp;(Accessed&amp;nbsp;30 April 2023).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>