<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-2-0-5</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3122</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;On current &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;w&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;orld, (non)religious diversity&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;and post-secular perspective&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;On current &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;w&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;orld, (non)religious diversity&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;and post-secular perspective&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Rutkevich</surname><given-names>Elena D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rutkevich</surname><given-names>Elena D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>erutkevich@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, 24/35, bl. 5, Krzhizhanovskogo Str., 117218, Moscow, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2023/2/Руткевич.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article focuses on the following problems: definition of the World in the process of transition from modernity to post-modernity; description of the specific traits of post-modern and post-secular; (non)religious diversity with the appearance of such types of (non)religious identity as &amp;ldquo;nones&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;spiritual, but not religious&amp;rdquo; and new types of religion. They are the concrete examples of the changes in the consciousness of the (post) modern man and the forming of (non) religious identity, including religion, unbelief, and spirituality. On the one hand, a significant number of &amp;ldquo;nones&amp;rdquo; and undefined believers are emerging in many Western countries, and on the other hand, there is the growth and religious mobilization of new and old religions, both in the Western world and beyond. &amp;nbsp;Although secularization exists, it is difficult to call today&amp;#39;s world secular, taking into account&amp;nbsp;the simultaneous &amp;ldquo;return of religion&amp;rdquo; (often in new qualities and new forms) in some circumstances (Islam throughout the world, Christianity in the South), the decline of religion in others (the weakening of Christianity in the West, the widespread change and multiplication of religions and the spread of increasingly experimental, individualized, spiritual forms of religion). Religions enter into public sphere, there is growth of &amp;ldquo;fundementalisms&amp;rdquo; all over the world. Religions today are filling up with different content, implying &amp;ldquo;new religiousness&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;new&amp;rdquo; (enriched by specific energy and vitality) old religious traditions: &amp;ldquo;new Islam&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;new Christianity&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;new Induism&amp;rdquo;, etc. And since they acquire a new quality of the post-secular (independence, passionarity, aspiration to embrace the whole world, when it is no longer &amp;ldquo;religion&amp;rdquo; that adapts to the world, but the world to religion), it is more logical to study them in the post-secular paradigm, not in the &amp;quot;paradigm of secularization&amp;quot;.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article focuses on the following problems: definition of the World in the process of transition from modernity to post-modernity; description of the specific traits of post-modern and post-secular; (non)religious diversity with the appearance of such types of (non)religious identity as &amp;ldquo;nones&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;spiritual, but not religious&amp;rdquo; and new types of religion. They are the concrete examples of the changes in the consciousness of the (post) modern man and the forming of (non) religious identity, including religion, unbelief, and spirituality. On the one hand, a significant number of &amp;ldquo;nones&amp;rdquo; and undefined believers are emerging in many Western countries, and on the other hand, there is the growth and religious mobilization of new and old religions, both in the Western world and beyond. &amp;nbsp;Although secularization exists, it is difficult to call today&amp;#39;s world secular, taking into account&amp;nbsp;the simultaneous &amp;ldquo;return of religion&amp;rdquo; (often in new qualities and new forms) in some circumstances (Islam throughout the world, Christianity in the South), the decline of religion in others (the weakening of Christianity in the West, the widespread change and multiplication of religions and the spread of increasingly experimental, individualized, spiritual forms of religion). Religions enter into public sphere, there is growth of &amp;ldquo;fundementalisms&amp;rdquo; all over the world. Religions today are filling up with different content, implying &amp;ldquo;new religiousness&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;new&amp;rdquo; (enriched by specific energy and vitality) old religious traditions: &amp;ldquo;new Islam&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;new Christianity&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;new Induism&amp;rdquo;, etc. And since they acquire a new quality of the post-secular (independence, passionarity, aspiration to embrace the whole world, when it is no longer &amp;ldquo;religion&amp;rdquo; that adapts to the world, but the world to religion), it is more logical to study them in the post-secular paradigm, not in the &amp;quot;paradigm of secularization&amp;quot;.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>post-modern society</kwd><kwd>deconstruction of religion</kwd><kwd>(non) religious diversity</kwd><kwd>religious</kwd><kwd>secular</kwd><kwd>nones</kwd><kwd>spiritual turn</kwd><kwd>fundamentalism</kwd><kwd>post-secular perspective</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>post-modern society</kwd><kwd>deconstruction of religion</kwd><kwd>(non) religious diversity</kwd><kwd>religious</kwd><kwd>secular</kwd><kwd>nones</kwd><kwd>spiritual turn</kwd><kwd>fundamentalism</kwd><kwd>post-secular perspective</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Antonov, K.,&amp;nbsp;Pol&amp;rsquo;skov,&amp;nbsp;K., Smirnov,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;(2023), &amp;ldquo;Secularization and post-secularity (on discussion about the modern conceptional framework of Religious Studies)&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik PSTGU.&amp;nbsp;Seria I.&amp;nbsp;Bogoslovie.&amp;nbsp;Filosofia.&amp;nbsp;Religiovedenie,&amp;nbsp;105,&amp;nbsp;138-154. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Berger, P. (1999), Desecularization of the World: A Global Overview, Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Polotics, ed. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Berger,&amp;nbsp;P. (2012),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Falsified Secularisation&amp;rdquo;,&amp;nbsp;Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov v &amp;nbsp;Rossii i za rubezhom,&amp;nbsp;2(30), 8-20.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Berger,&amp;nbsp;P. (2014), Many Altars of Modernity: Towards a Paradigm for Religion in a Pluralistic Age,&amp;nbsp;Boston; Berlin; De Gruyter.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Beyer,&amp;nbsp;P. &amp;nbsp;(2013),&amp;nbsp;Religion in the Context of globalization. A Developing of theoretical perspective, Religion in the context of globalization. Essays on concept, form and political implications,&amp;nbsp;Routledge, N.Y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Casanova,&amp;nbsp;J. (2018),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Exploring the Postsecular. Three Meanings of &amp;ldquo;the Secular&amp;rdquo;and Their Possible Transcendence&amp;rdquo;, Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov v Rossii i za rubezhom, (4),&amp;nbsp;143-174.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Clark,&amp;nbsp;P. B. &amp;nbsp;(2006),&amp;nbsp;New Religions in Global Perspective: Religious Change in the Modern World,&amp;nbsp;Routledge,&amp;nbsp;N.Y. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Kelly, D. (1972),&amp;nbsp;Why Conservative Churches are growing? Harper and Row, N.Y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Gorski,&amp;nbsp;Ph., Kim D., Torpey,&amp;nbsp;J., VonAntwerpen,&amp;nbsp;J. (2012),&amp;nbsp;The post-secular in question, &amp;nbsp;The Postsecular in question,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;New York University Press,&amp;nbsp;N.Y, 1-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Philippova,&amp;nbsp;E. (2017),&amp;nbsp;Religiousness and secularity in age of Postmodern and attempts of its comprehension: terms, concepts, hypotheses, Religii i radikalizm v postsekuliarnom mire [Religions and Radicalism in Post-secular World]. ed. Philippova E. And Radvani J., &amp;nbsp;Institut &amp;nbsp;etnologii i antropologii RAN imeni &amp;nbsp;N. N. Micklucho-Maklaia. Goriachaia liniia. Telecom. &amp;nbsp;Seriia Rossiisko-franzuzskii dialog, Moscow, Russia.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Hervier-Leger,&amp;nbsp;D. (1993),&amp;nbsp;La religion pour memoir, Les editions des Serf,&amp;nbsp;Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Heelas,&amp;nbsp;P., Woodhead,&amp;nbsp;L. (2005),&amp;nbsp;The Spiritual Revolution,&amp;nbsp;Blackwell Publishing,&amp;nbsp;Oxford. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Ionin,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;G. (2002),&amp;nbsp;Podstupy k novoi magicheskoi epohe&amp;nbsp;[Approaches to new magic age], Postmodern: New magic Age&amp;nbsp;[ Postmodern: Novaia magicheskaia epoha],&amp;nbsp;Sbornik statei, ed.by &amp;nbsp;Ionina L., Moscow, Russia, 9-23.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Inglehart,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;(1999),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Cultural shift in mature industrial society&amp;rdquo;, Novaia industrial&amp;rsquo;naia volna na Zapade[ New industrial wave in the West], Academia, Moscow, Russia, 249-260.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Kargina,&amp;nbsp;I. (2013),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Phemnomen of &amp;ldquo;next Christian world: typical &amp;nbsp;features &amp;nbsp;and tendencies&amp;rdquo;, Vestnic&amp;nbsp;Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seria&amp;nbsp;18. Sotsiologia I politologia, (1), 105-113.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Karpov,&amp;nbsp;V. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Conceptual foundations of&amp;nbsp;the secularisation theory&amp;rdquo;, Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov&amp;rsquo; v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2(30), 114-164.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Kyrlezhev,&amp;nbsp;A. (2011),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Postsecular Age. Notes on religious-cultural situation&amp;rdquo;, Religion. Gnosis. Kontinent, 3(149), 357-365.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Kyrlezhev,&amp;nbsp;A. (2012),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Review on Rethinking Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011.311P. and The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society. N.Y., London: New York University Press, 2012. 375 p.&amp;rdquo;, Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov. v Rossii i za rubezhom, (2), 301-313.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Kyrlezhev,&amp;nbsp;A. (2013),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Secularism and postsecularism in Russia and worldwide&amp;rdquo;, Otechestvennye Zapiski, 1(52)&amp;nbsp;[Online],&amp;nbsp;available at:&amp;nbsp;http://www.strana-oz.ru/2013/1/seculyarizm-i-postseculyarizm-v-rossii-i-v-mire&amp;nbsp;(Accessed 18&amp;nbsp;March 2023). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Lipka, M. (2015), Millennials Increasingly Are Driving Growth of &amp;lsquo;Nones, vol. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Matetskaia,&amp;nbsp;A. (2017),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Postmodern and religion&amp;rdquo;, Gramota, (12),&amp;nbsp;125-128.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Matetskaia,&amp;nbsp;A. (2022),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;After political religion: specifics of Russian post-secularity&amp;rdquo;, Politiia, 3(106), 48-64. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Rutkevich,&amp;nbsp;E. (2021),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;(Non) religious diversity and correlation of religious, spiritual and secular&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii RAN, 1(3), 54-78.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Rutkevich,&amp;nbsp;N. (2021),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Rejis Debre. Last oracle of French Republic&amp;rdquo;, Voprosy filosofii, (8), 92-103.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Sogomonov,&amp;nbsp;A. (2005),&amp;nbsp;Genealogia uspehov i neudach&amp;nbsp;[Genealogy of successes and failures], Zentr sotsiologicheskogo obrazovaniia RAN, Moscow, Russia.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Uzlaner,&amp;nbsp;D. (2020),&amp;nbsp;Postsekuuliarnyi povorot: kak myslit&amp;rsquo; o religii v XXI veke? [Post-secular Turn: how to think on religion in 21-st century?], Moscow, Russia.&amp;nbsp;(In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Vernon, G. (1968),&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;The Religious nones&amp;rdquo;: A Neglected Category,&amp;nbsp;Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion&amp;rdquo;, 7(2), 219-29. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Woodhead,&amp;nbsp;L. (2016 a),&amp;nbsp;The Rise of &amp;ldquo;No Religion&amp;rdquo;: towards an explanation, Sociology of religion, 78, 247-262.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Woodhead,&amp;nbsp;L. (2016 (b)),&amp;nbsp;Intensified Religious Pluralism and De-differentiation: the British Example. UK.Springerlink.com, Society, 53, 41-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>World Christian encyclopedia: a comparative survey of churches and religions in the Modern</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>World (2001), ed. by Barett&amp;nbsp;D., Kirian&amp;nbsp;G., Jhonson&amp;nbsp;T., Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>