Список литературы

2408-9338

Research result. Sociology and Management

2408-9338

10.18413/2408-9338-2021-7-1-0-8

2347

SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES

<strong>Transformation of social and environmental practices of waste management in the mentality of Russian citizens</strong>

Ermolaeva

Yulia V.

Ermolaeva

Yulia V.

mistelfrayard@mail.ru

Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117218, bld. 5, 24/35, Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, Russia

2021

7100

The article, based on mini-interviews with citizens (n=170), examines the problem of perceiving waste as environmental practice, personal influence, understanding the practice of separate waste collection and motivation for it as the main environmental practice accessible to citizens. Theories of sustainable behavior (activation theory, norms; values-convictions; planned behavior theory) are used to compile and analyze the results. Personal contribution to the problem of waste is recognized by 90% of respondents, but only 30% of the sample carries it out. The level of knowledge about the problem of waste among Russians is high, but this does not mean persistent motivation to pro-ecological action, because they are determined not only by the balance of values (egoistic or ecological), but also by the balance of locus of control (what a person can, and what society can/should do). The core motivation that divides respondents into environmentally active and non-environmentally active comes down to comfort, comfort for eco-activists means a clean future (biosphere values prevail), and comfort for those who do not share waste – conditions (convenient infrastructure, benefits), which is confirmed by modern Western studies. In Russian reality, the complex of personal responsibility is manifested only in environmental activists. Like the all-Russian study, the interviews showed the importance of implementing a widespread infrastructure of separate collection, strengthening economic and social motivation. In the article, the citizens highlighted the recommendations at the macro, meso and micro level for different stakeholders, they come down to the improvement of collection infrastructure, greater involvement of municipal and state authorities, ensuring recycling, as well as the tightening of measures for undesirable behavior in the field of waste management.

separate waste collectionwastequalitative researchinterviewsecomodernization

Список литературы

Bek, U. (2000), Risk Society. On the way to another modernity, Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Bodriyyar, Z. H. (2006), Consumer Society, Respublika, Kul'turnaya Revolyutsiya, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Giddens, E. (1994), “Fate, Risk and Security”, Thesis, (5), 107-134. (in Russian)

Dul'zon, A. A., Ushakov, V. Ya. and Chubik, P. S. (2012), “Resource efficiency – the basis for sustainable development of civilization”, Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta, (6), 39-43. (in Russian)

Yermolayeva, P. O. and Yermolayeva, Yu. V. (2019), “Critical analysis of foreign theories of ecological behavior”, Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social changes, (4), 323-346. (in Russian)

Il'in, V. I. (2005), “Consumer society: theoretical model and Russian reality”, Mir Rossii, 14 (2), 3-40. (in Russian)

“How to turn garbage into a benefit?” (2018), Separate waste collection in Russia: best practices, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Luman, N. (2004), Society of Society, Part I. Society as a social system, Logos, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Medouz, D. (2007), Limits to growth. The 30-year update, Akademkniga, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Reymers, N. F. (1992), Conservation of nature and the environment. Reference dictionary, Prosveshcheniye, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Rybakova, M. V. (2009), “Socio-ecological system in urban ecological practices”, Vestnik Universiteta gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya, (8), 129-135. (in Russian)

Rybakova, M. V. (2008), Environmental practices in a socio-cultural context, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Shabanova, M. A. (2019), “Separate collection of household waste in Russia: level, factors and potential for inclusion of the population”, Mir Rossii, 28 (3), 88-112. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-3-88-112 (in Russian)

Yanitskiy, O. N. (2011), Eco-modernization of Russia: theory, practice, prospects, Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Yanitskiy, O. N. (2018), “Waste as a subject of interdisciplinary analysis” available at: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=5867 (Accessed 14 January 2021). (in Russian)

Akrich, M. (1992), “The De-Scription of Technical Objects in Bijker & Law Shaping Technology”, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.

Chernovich, E. (2013), “Technology and pro-environmental behavior in urban households: how technologies mediate domestic routines”, Working papers, available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2013/10/09/1280336516/18STI2013.pdf (Accessed 14 January 2021)

Crocker, R. and Lehmann, S. (2012), “Conclusion: The culture and politics of zero waste – looking ahead”, Designing for Zero Waste – Consumption, Technologies and the Built Environment, Earthscan, London, UK, 385-393.

Davies, A., Frances, F., Rau, H. and Pape, J. (2010), “Sustainable consumption and governance: Reflecting on a research agenda for Ireland”, Irish Geography, 43 (1), 59-79.

Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A. and Gärling, T. (2008), “The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28 (1), 1-9.

Koger, S. and Winter, D. N. (2010), The Psychology of Environmental Problems, Psychology Press, New York, USA.

Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. (2002), “Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?”, Environmental Education Research, 8 (3), 239-260.

Macnaghten, P. (2003), “Embodying the environment in everyday life practices”, The Sociological Review, 51 (1), 63-84. DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.00408.

Meyer, G. (1987), “Waste Recycling as a Livelihood in the Informal Sector- The Example of Refuse Collectors in Cairo”, Applied Geography and Development, (30), 78-94.

Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009), “A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi- level learning processes in resource governance regimes”, Global Environmental Change, (19), 354-365.

Schwartz, S. H. (1997), “Normative influences on altruism”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10 (1), 221-279. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60358-5.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994), “Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?”, Journal of Social Issues, 50 (4), 19-45.

Schwartz, S. H. (1977), “Normative influences on altruism”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.

Shove, E. (2003), “Converging Convention of comfort, cleanliness and convenience”, Journal of Consumer policy, (26), 395-418.

Stern, P. C. (2005), “Understanding individuals' environmentally significant behavior”, Environmental Law Reporter: News and Analysis, 35, 10785-10790.

Stern, P. C. (1999), “Information, incentives and pro-environmental consumer behavior”, Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 461-468.

Stern, P. C. (2000), “New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior”, Journal of social issues, 56 (3), 407-424.

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. and Kalof, L. (1999), “A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism “, Human ecology review, 6 (2), 81-98.

Stern, P. C. (2005), “Understanding individuals' environmentally significant behavior”, Environmental Law Reporter: News and Analysis, 35, 10785-10790.

Vining, J. and Ebreo, A. (2002), “Predicting recycling behavior form global and specificenvironmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, (22), 1580-1607.