<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-4-0-9</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2244</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Problems of sociological measurement of social and network group formation in the context of Russian national projects implementation&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Problems of sociological measurement of social and network group formation in the context of Russian national projects implementation&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bogdanov</surname><given-names>Vladimir S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bogdanov</surname><given-names>Vladimir S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>valarf@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Smirnova</surname><given-names>Anastasiia S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Smirnova</surname><given-names>Anastasiia S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>nastyanestea812@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Sociology, Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, bld. 5, 24/35 Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, 117218, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2020/4/146-168.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article presents the results of testing the measurement of social network group formation (hereinafter &amp;ldquo;SNGF&amp;rdquo;) within the framework of national projects as a new way to establish in the online network space the processes of formation and interaction of collective subjects (stakeholders) interested in the quality of development and specific results of project solutions. The identification and interpretation of the essential characteristics of collective subjects that have common or different interests, behavioral strategies, and goals can be measured sociologically in the process of group formation, which can result in fixing the origin of the activity of a new collective subjectness or new social groups. The General humanistic approach to society in modern sociology recognizes the importance of all social groups, since the difference in their position leads to different interests, the coordination of which is the main goal of state policy. During the development and implementation of project solutions, there are solution groups that are responsible for setting the problem, setting goals, and choosing the means to achieve them. The nature and contours of the solution groups within the framework of national projects are defined by the authorities, which set the criteria for processes of participation or exclusion of stakeholders in addressing important social issues and the ability to operationalize the design decisions. The testing of the SNGF is based on the materials of an online search study (2019) conducted in 4 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The study was updated in the context of an academic project implemented by the Center for Sociology of Management and Social Technologies of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the support of the Russian Scientific Foundation (Research Project No. 19-18-00345). Attention of the study is focused on the empirical measurement of the general trends of SNGFs through specially developed indices of network social subjectness, expressed in the online network interaction of regional stakeholders regarding the creation and resolution of problems, the search for constructive solutions to them or translation of the protests during the implementation of national projects. Three criteria for the diagnosis of social network subjectness are proposed: the availability, content and dissemination of targeted information from the authorities sufficient to activate and constructively include the population in management decisions; the presence/absence of online and offline forms of inclusion of the population (using its potential: information, knowledge, resources) in the implementation of national projects based on the organization of social feedback; the nature of interaction (neutral, oppositional, organizational and constructive) between authorities and the population in the network space during the implementation of national projects. It was revealed that each region has its own character and trends in the organization of the SNGF and own criteria of social subjectness. There is a low level of public satisfaction with the implementation of national projects due to certain barriers and difficulties, including poorly organized social-oriented feedback regarding the implementation of project decisions. That is, today the SNGF as a process of intensifying the online communication interaction of stakeholders to develop socially oriented solutions within the framework of national projects is poorly regulated by the authorities. The population is practically not seen as one of the main performers of project activities. The revealed information on the implementation of projects, disseminated to a greater extent by the authorities, is often declarative and projective. Test of the methodology for sociological measurement of SNGF will continue in 2021 during the network monitoring of the implementation of national projects.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article presents the results of testing the measurement of social network group formation (hereinafter &amp;ldquo;SNGF&amp;rdquo;) within the framework of national projects as a new way to establish in the online network space the processes of formation and interaction of collective subjects (stakeholders) interested in the quality of development and specific results of project solutions. The identification and interpretation of the essential characteristics of collective subjects that have common or different interests, behavioral strategies, and goals can be measured sociologically in the process of group formation, which can result in fixing the origin of the activity of a new collective subjectness or new social groups. The General humanistic approach to society in modern sociology recognizes the importance of all social groups, since the difference in their position leads to different interests, the coordination of which is the main goal of state policy. During the development and implementation of project solutions, there are solution groups that are responsible for setting the problem, setting goals, and choosing the means to achieve them. The nature and contours of the solution groups within the framework of national projects are defined by the authorities, which set the criteria for processes of participation or exclusion of stakeholders in addressing important social issues and the ability to operationalize the design decisions. The testing of the SNGF is based on the materials of an online search study (2019) conducted in 4 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The study was updated in the context of an academic project implemented by the Center for Sociology of Management and Social Technologies of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the support of the Russian Scientific Foundation (Research Project No. 19-18-00345). Attention of the study is focused on the empirical measurement of the general trends of SNGFs through specially developed indices of network social subjectness, expressed in the online network interaction of regional stakeholders regarding the creation and resolution of problems, the search for constructive solutions to them or translation of the protests during the implementation of national projects. Three criteria for the diagnosis of social network subjectness are proposed: the availability, content and dissemination of targeted information from the authorities sufficient to activate and constructively include the population in management decisions; the presence/absence of online and offline forms of inclusion of the population (using its potential: information, knowledge, resources) in the implementation of national projects based on the organization of social feedback; the nature of interaction (neutral, oppositional, organizational and constructive) between authorities and the population in the network space during the implementation of national projects. It was revealed that each region has its own character and trends in the organization of the SNGF and own criteria of social subjectness. There is a low level of public satisfaction with the implementation of national projects due to certain barriers and difficulties, including poorly organized social-oriented feedback regarding the implementation of project decisions. That is, today the SNGF as a process of intensifying the online communication interaction of stakeholders to develop socially oriented solutions within the framework of national projects is poorly regulated by the authorities. The population is practically not seen as one of the main performers of project activities. The revealed information on the implementation of projects, disseminated to a greater extent by the authorities, is often declarative and projective. Test of the methodology for sociological measurement of SNGF will continue in 2021 during the network monitoring of the implementation of national projects.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>social network grouping</kwd><kwd>online social networks</kwd><kwd>network interaction</kwd><kwd>social network subjectivity</kwd><kwd>social feedback</kwd><kwd>sociological dimension in online social networks</kwd><kwd>national projects</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>social network grouping</kwd><kwd>online social networks</kwd><kwd>network interaction</kwd><kwd>social network subjectivity</kwd><kwd>social feedback</kwd><kwd>sociological dimension in online social networks</kwd><kwd>national projects</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bogdanov, V.&amp;nbsp;S. (2017), E-governance in society: social and cognitive problems: monography, Universitetskaya kniga, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bourdieu, P. (1994), Choses dites, Transl. by Shmatko, N.&amp;nbsp;A., Socio-Logos, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Gorshkov, M. and Sedova, N. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Self-sustained&amp;raquo; Russians and their life priorities&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (12), 4-16. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Gradoselskaya, G. Scheglova, T. and Karpov, I. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Mapping of politically active groups on Facebook: dynamics of 2013-2018&amp;rdquo;, Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti, (4), 94-104. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Dokuka, S. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Praxis of using online social networks&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (1), 137-145. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Dridze, T. (1998), &amp;ldquo;Social communication in management with feedback&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (10), 44-47. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Castells, M. (2004), The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, and society, Transl. by Matveeva, A. in Kharitonov, V. (ed.), U-Faktoria, Ekaterinberg, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Li, D. &amp;ldquo;Mechanisms of reputation management in social media&amp;rdquo;, [Online], available at: http://postnauka.ru/video/46789 (Accessed 28.09.2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Rheingold, H. (2006), Smart mobs: the next social revolution, Transl. by Garkavyi, A., in Lugovaya, I. (ed.), FAIR PRESS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Tikhonov, A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2017), Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of socio-cultural modernization of regions, in Tikhonov, A.&amp;nbsp;V. (ed.), FNISTS RAN, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Smorgunov, L. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Institutionalization of gogernability and the problem of veillance in the space of digital communications&amp;rdquo;, South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (3), 62-75. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Tikhonov, A. (2011), &amp;ldquo;From Sociology of management to sociology of administration&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (2), 40-45. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Tikhonov, A. (2009), Sociology of management: Theoretical bases, Kanon+, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Tikhonov, A. and Merzlykov, A. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Manageability of social group formation processes in regions with different levels of sociocultural modernization&amp;rdquo;, Research Result. Sociology and Management, 5 (4), 176-183. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Tikhonov, A. V. and Bogdanov, V. S. (2020), &amp;ldquo;From &amp;laquo;smart regulation&amp;raquo; to &amp;laquo;smart management&amp;raquo;: social issue of feedback digitalization&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (1), 74-81. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Shchedrovitskiy, P. (1993), &amp;ldquo;Essay on the main ideas of system-mind-making pedagogics&amp;rdquo;, in Essays on philosophy of education, Pedagog. Centre Experiment, Moscow, Russia, 125-144. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Scherbina, V. (2018), Rationalizing diagnostic managerial social technologies, FNISC RAN, Novyy khronograpg, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Boyd, D. (2007), &amp;ldquo;Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life&amp;rdquo;, in MacArthur foundation series on digital learning&amp;ndash;Youth, identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Chatfield, A. and Reddick, C.&amp;nbsp;G. (2015), &amp;ldquo;Understanding Risk Communication Gaps through E-Government Website and Twitter Hashtag Content Analyses: The Case of Indonesia&amp;rsquo;s Mt. Sinabung Eruption&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 12 (2), 351-385.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Cornia, A., Sehl, A., Levy, D. A. L. and Nielsen, R.&amp;nbsp;K. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Private Sector News, Social Media Distribution, and Algorithm Change&amp;rdquo;, Reuters Institute, University of Oxford, available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-10/Cornia_Private_Sector_News_FINAL.pdf. (Accessed 24.09.2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Cotterill, S. and King, S. (2007), &amp;ldquo;Public Sector Partnerships to Deliver Local E-Government: A Social Network Study&amp;rdquo;, Electronic Government. EGOV 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4656.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Gonzalez-Bailon, S. and Wang, N. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Networked Discontent: The Anatomy of Protest Campaigns in Social Media&amp;rdquo;, Social Networks, 44, 95-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Mayo, E. (2007), The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilisation, Routledge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Par&amp;eacute;s, M., Bonet-Mart&amp;iacute;, J. and Mart&amp;iacute;-Costa, M. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Does Participation Really Matter in Urban Regeneration Policies? Exploring Governance Networks in Catalonia (Spain)&amp;rdquo;, Urban Affairs Review, 48 (2), 238-271.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Punam, B. and Sharma, Ch. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Community detection in social networks&amp;rdquo;, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 6 (3), available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295395520_Community_detection_in_social_networks (Accessed 24.09.2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Rheingold, H. (1993), The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, The electronic version of The Virtual Community, available at: http:// www.rheingold.com/vc/book/intro.html (Accessed 28.09.2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies (2014), Adopted by the OECD Council on 15 July 2014, OECD, available at: https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/recommendation-on-digital-government-strategies.htm (Accessed 29.09.2020).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Srivastava, M. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Social Media and Its Use by the Government&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 3 (2), 161-172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Wellman, B. (2001), &amp;ldquo;Physical and Cyber Place: The rise of personalized Networking&amp;rdquo;, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 228.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>