<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-3-0-4</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2164</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;New logical bases for research of Orthodox churchliness&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;New logical bases for research of Orthodox churchliness&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Sukhorukov</surname><given-names>Victor V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sukhorukov</surname><given-names>Victor V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>verger@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Internet-portal “Sociology of religion”, Russia, Belgorod</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2020/3/67-76.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Abstract. There is an opinion among sociologists of religion that it is impossible to quantify religiosity by the method of polling. The author rejected the extreme agnosticism in relation to measuring the strength of individual faith and considered one of the options for such a method. The famous sociologist &amp;ndash; researcher of Orthodoxy V. F. Chesnokova &amp;ndash; created an index of churchliness (C-index), which categorizes respondents into five churched groups according to the strongest answer to five main questions about actual religiosity. Additional questions could change the result only in the direction of strengthening the churchliness. Previous critical articles on the C-index have proven incorrect. Now is the time to make an attempt to fix this toolkit. In order to avoid overestimating the number of deeply believers, it is proposed to reconstruct the logical foundations of the aforementioned method of measuring the degree of Orthodox
religiosity. Instead of a clear affiliation with one of the five groups in accordance with actual religiosity, a vague affiliation with a single Orthodox group was proposed on the basis of comparing actual religiosity with the normative one. Various variants of the membership function are considered. The requirements for this element of the sociological methodology have been developed: it must, firstly, be mathematically correct, and secondly, implement the following proposition: the closer to each other the arguments of the function (i.e., the more the concrete x and the abstract y modality correspond to each other), the greater the value of the function, the further &amp;ndash; the less. For all criteria, the membership function 𝜇𝐴(𝑎) = 1 &amp;minus; |𝑥 &amp;minus; 𝑦| is applied. A profound modernization of the approach to empirical quantification of the degree of Orthodox religiosity has made it possible to create an innovative toolkit for measuring the number of believers.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract. There is an opinion among sociologists of religion that it is impossible to quantify religiosity by the method of polling. The author rejected the extreme agnosticism in relation to measuring the strength of individual faith and considered one of the options for such a method. The famous sociologist &amp;ndash; researcher of Orthodoxy V. F. Chesnokova &amp;ndash; created an index of churchliness (C-index), which categorizes respondents into five churched groups according to the strongest answer to five main questions about actual religiosity. Additional questions could change the result only in the direction of strengthening the churchliness. Previous critical articles on the C-index have proven incorrect. Now is the time to make an attempt to fix this toolkit. In order to avoid overestimating the number of deeply believers, it is proposed to reconstruct the logical foundations of the aforementioned method of measuring the degree of Orthodox
religiosity. Instead of a clear affiliation with one of the five groups in accordance with actual religiosity, a vague affiliation with a single Orthodox group was proposed on the basis of comparing actual religiosity with the normative one. Various variants of the membership function are considered. The requirements for this element of the sociological methodology have been developed: it must, firstly, be mathematically correct, and secondly, implement the following proposition: the closer to each other the arguments of the function (i.e., the more the concrete x and the abstract y modality correspond to each other), the greater the value of the function, the further &amp;ndash; the less. For all criteria, the membership function 𝜇𝐴(𝑎) = 1 &amp;minus; |𝑥 &amp;minus; 𝑦| is applied. A profound modernization of the approach to empirical quantification of the degree of Orthodox religiosity has made it possible to create an innovative toolkit for measuring the number of believers.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>religiosity</kwd><kwd>degree of Orthodox religiosity</kwd><kwd>feature quantification</kwd><kwd>index of churchliness</kwd><kwd>fuzzy logic</kwd><kwd>deontic logic</kwd><kwd>morphological approach to measuring re-ligiosity</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>religiosity</kwd><kwd>degree of Orthodox religiosity</kwd><kwd>feature quantification</kwd><kwd>index of churchliness</kwd><kwd>fuzzy logic</kwd><kwd>deontic logic</kwd><kwd>morphological approach to measuring re-ligiosity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Alexeeva,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;S. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Churchliness as an indicator of religiosity&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (9), 97-102. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Andreeva,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;А. and Andreeva,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;К. (2010), &amp;ldquo;Religiousness of student youth. The experience of comparing with the religiosity of Russians&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (9), 95-98. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Barannikov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;P. and Matronina,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;F. (2004), &amp;ldquo;Dynamics of religiosity in the information society&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (9), 102-107. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Bogatova,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;A. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Religious identity and religious practice in Mordovia&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (8), 114-122. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Churchliness of Orthodox believers (2014), available at: http://fom.ru/TSennosti/11587 (Accessed 27.07.2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Gorshkov,&amp;nbsp;М.&amp;nbsp;К. and Sheregi,&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;E. (2011), Applied Sociology: Methodology and Methods, Moscow, Russia, available at: https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Prikl_Soc_full.pdf, IS RAS (Accessed 27.07.2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Divisenko,&amp;nbsp;К.&amp;nbsp;S. (2016), &amp;ldquo;In a narrow way and in the right direction: the problem of identifying a strong group of Orthodox believers&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (10), 128-138. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Kotelnikov,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;А. and Lebedev,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;D. (2004), &amp;ldquo;Conceptual models of interaction between secular and religious cultures&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (5), 121-125. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Lebedev,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;D. (2007), &amp;ldquo;The secular school and the reproduction of religiosity in a secular society&amp;rdquo;, Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, (1), 72-78. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Lebedev,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;D. and Sukhorukov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;V. (2013), &amp;ldquo;The narrow path is not there?&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (1), 118-126. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Lokosov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;V. and Sinelina,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;J. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Religious state of modern Russian society (sociological aspects)&amp;rdquo;, available at: http://www.interfax-religion.ru/?act=analysis&amp;amp;div=103 (Accessed 07.08.2019). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Markin,&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Between belief and unbelief: non-practicing Orthodox Christians in the context of the Russian sociology of religion&amp;rdquo;, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (2), 266-282. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Nonclassical logic: tutorial (2006), compiler Kuparashvili, М.&amp;nbsp;D., ОmSU Press, Omsk, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Paniotto,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;I. and Maximenko,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;S. (1982), Quantitative Methods in Sociological Research, Naukova dumka, Kiev, USSR. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Prutskova,&amp;nbsp;Е.&amp;nbsp;V. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Operationalization of the concept of religiosity in empirical research&amp;rdquo;, State, religion, church in Russia and abroad, (2), 267-293. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Reutov,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;N. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Sociocultural practices of integrating religious and secular education&amp;rdquo;, Ph.D. Thesis, Saratov, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Sinelina,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;J. (2001), &amp;ldquo;On the criteria for determining the religiosity of the population&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (7), 89-96. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Sinelina,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;J. (2005), &amp;ldquo;Churchliness and superstitious behavior of residents of the Yaroslavl region&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (3), 96-107. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Sinelina,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;J. (2006), &amp;ldquo;The dynamics of the process of churching Orthodox&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (11), 89-97. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Sinelina,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;J. (2009), &amp;ldquo;Orthodox and Muslims: A Comparative Analysis of Religious Behavior and Value Orientations&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (4), 89-95. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Sinelina,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;J. (2013), &amp;ldquo;On the dynamics of the religiosity of Russians and some methodological problems of its study (religious consciousness and behavior of Orthodox Christians and Muslims)&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (10), 104-115. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Trofimov,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;V. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Formation of beliefs in modern society as a process of &amp;lsquo;bricolage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rdquo;, V All-Russian sociological congress &amp;ldquo;Sociology and society: social inequality and social justice&amp;rdquo;, UrFU, Ekaterinburg, Russia, 1225-1227. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Ufimtseva,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;I. (2013), &amp;ldquo;Specifics of churchling in assessments of Orthodox youth&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (1), 127-135. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Uzlaner,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;А. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Secularization as a sociological concept (according to research by Western sociologists)&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (8), 62-67. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Filatov,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;B. and Lunkin,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;N. (2005), &amp;ldquo;Statistics of Russian religiosity: the magic of numbers and ambiguous reality&amp;rdquo;, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, (6), 35-45. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Folieva,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;A. (2014), &amp;ldquo;Religious self-socialization of adults as bricolage&amp;rdquo;, Materials of Four international scientific conference &amp;ldquo;Sociology of religion in the late Modern society&amp;rdquo;, Lebedev, S.&amp;nbsp;D. (ed.), Belgorod, Russia, 283-287. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Chesnokova,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;F. (2005), In a narrow path: the process of churching the population of Russia at the end of the XX century, Academic project, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Yatsutsenko,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;V. &amp;ldquo;An attempt to define contemporary Religious representations and practices: Dani&amp;egrave;le Hervieu-L&amp;eacute;ger&amp;rdquo;, RUDN Herald, series Sociology, (4), 18-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Basil,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;D. (2005), &amp;ldquo;Church-State Relations in Russia: Orthodoxy and Federation Law, 1990-2004&amp;rdquo;, Religion, State &amp;amp; Society, (2), 151-163.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Glock,&amp;nbsp;C.&amp;nbsp;Y. and Stark,&amp;nbsp;R. (1974), American Piety: the Nature of religious Commitment, University of California Press, London, UK, Berkeley and Los Angeles, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Hervieu-L&amp;eacute;ger, D. (2015) &amp;ldquo;In Search of Certainties: The Paradoxes of Religiosity in Societies of High Modernity&amp;rdquo;, State, religion, church in Russia and abroad, 33 (1), 254-268.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Mankoff,&amp;nbsp;J. and Miller,&amp;nbsp;A. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Ukraine&amp;rsquo;s Church Politics in War and Revolution&amp;rdquo;, in Oliker, O. (ed.) Religion and Violence in Russia, Rowman&amp;amp;Littlefield, Lanham, Boulder, New-York, London, UK, 233-262.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Marsh, C. (2008), &amp;ldquo;Russian Orthodox Christians and Their Orientation toward Church and State&amp;rdquo;, in Daniel, W.&amp;nbsp;L., Berger, P.&amp;nbsp;L. and Marsh, C. (eds.) Perspectives on Church-State relations in Russia, J.M. Dawson institute of church-state studies Baylor university, USA, 85-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Eshghi, S., Williams, G.-R., Colombo, G.&amp;nbsp;B., Turner, L.&amp;nbsp;D., Rand, D.&amp;nbsp;G., Whitaker, R.&amp;nbsp;M. and Tassiulas, L. (2017a), &amp;ldquo;Mathematical models</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>for social group behavior&amp;rdquo;, IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence &amp;amp; Computing, Advanced &amp;amp; Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing &amp;amp; Communications, Cloud &amp;amp; Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation, California, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Eshghi, S., Williams, G.-R., Colombo, G.&amp;nbsp;B., Turner, L.&amp;nbsp;D., Rand, D.&amp;nbsp;G., Whitaker, R.&amp;nbsp;M. and Tassiulas, L. (2017b), &amp;ldquo;Stability and fracture of social groups&amp;rdquo;, 55th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton, USA, 478-485.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Lindahl,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;R., Fisher,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;E., Cooper,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;J., Rosen,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;K. and Britton,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;B. (2017), &amp;ldquo;The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists&amp;rdquo;, PLoS ONE, 12 (5), 1-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Oppy,&amp;nbsp;G. (2018), Atheism and Agnosticism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Whitaker, R.&amp;nbsp;M., Turner, L. and Colombo, G. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Intra-group tension under inter-group conflict: a generative model using group social norms and identity&amp;rdquo;, Advances in Cross-Cultural Decision Making: Proceedings of the AHFE International Conference on Cross-Cultural Decision Making, Springer International Publishing,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>167-179.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>Wuthnow,&amp;nbsp;R. (2007), America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>