<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-3-0-1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2163</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE AND SPIRITUAL LIFE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Attitude towards childbirth in &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;modern families of priests of the Russian Orthodox Church: experience of typology&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Attitude towards childbirth in &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;modern families of priests of the Russian Orthodox Church: experience of typology&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Markov</surname><given-names>Dmitry Al.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Markov</surname><given-names>Dmitry Al.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>archprotolip@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University, bld. 1, 6 Likhov Ln., Moscow, 127051, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2020/3/9-28.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Modern sociological research often reveals the rhetoric of the family crisis in Russia, which is dependent on low birth rates and a demographic decline. At the same time, using the example of the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Canada, Peru and other countries, one can see what influence the clergy can have on the religious population, including their attitude towards the birth of children. In this regard, a study analyzing reproductive attitudes in the families of priests of the Russian Orthodox Church, capable of influencing the population of Russia with about 70% of people who call themselves orthodox, seems relevant and productive. Twenty families were interviewed for this study and analyzed using the &amp;ldquo;grounded theory&amp;rdquo; method. The analysis of the reproductive attitudes in the families of clergy revealed significant differences. For the convenience of describing these differences, we classified the attitude to childbirth in the families of priests, highlighting the traditional, intermediate and managerial types. As a result of the study, we identified a greater potential for solving the demographic problem in the traditional-type families, which is characterized by respondents&amp;#39; trust in God in their views on childbirth and the assessment of non-abortion contraception as a sin. Respondents of the managerial type talk about the use of contraception not as a church norm, but as a choice of spouses, which can be justified by the spouses&amp;#39; health, their income level, their desire to fulfill themselves in their professions, their attitudes to each other, etc. The intermediate type of respondents mainly spoke about trusting God in the issue of childbirth as an ideal, and about using contraception as an action that is possible for a family to save money, as a compromise, or as a result of their lack of faith. Families of the intermediate and managerial types allowed the use of non-abortive contraception in relation to their own family, thereby supporting the idea of planning and birth control. As a conclusion, the article proposes to include the communication of candidates for the priesthood with experienced confessors of the traditional type in the modern system of clergy education, so that they can influence future clergy, who would then have an impact on the Orthodox population of Russia.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Modern sociological research often reveals the rhetoric of the family crisis in Russia, which is dependent on low birth rates and a demographic decline. At the same time, using the example of the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Canada, Peru and other countries, one can see what influence the clergy can have on the religious population, including their attitude towards the birth of children. In this regard, a study analyzing reproductive attitudes in the families of priests of the Russian Orthodox Church, capable of influencing the population of Russia with about 70% of people who call themselves orthodox, seems relevant and productive. Twenty families were interviewed for this study and analyzed using the &amp;ldquo;grounded theory&amp;rdquo; method. The analysis of the reproductive attitudes in the families of clergy revealed significant differences. For the convenience of describing these differences, we classified the attitude to childbirth in the families of priests, highlighting the traditional, intermediate and managerial types. As a result of the study, we identified a greater potential for solving the demographic problem in the traditional-type families, which is characterized by respondents&amp;#39; trust in God in their views on childbirth and the assessment of non-abortion contraception as a sin. Respondents of the managerial type talk about the use of contraception not as a church norm, but as a choice of spouses, which can be justified by the spouses&amp;#39; health, their income level, their desire to fulfill themselves in their professions, their attitudes to each other, etc. The intermediate type of respondents mainly spoke about trusting God in the issue of childbirth as an ideal, and about using contraception as an action that is possible for a family to save money, as a compromise, or as a result of their lack of faith. Families of the intermediate and managerial types allowed the use of non-abortive contraception in relation to their own family, thereby supporting the idea of planning and birth control. As a conclusion, the article proposes to include the communication of candidates for the priesthood with experienced confessors of the traditional type in the modern system of clergy education, so that they can influence future clergy, who would then have an impact on the Orthodox population of Russia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>family</kwd><kwd>clergy</kwd><kwd>childbearing</kwd><kwd>demography</kwd><kwd>non-abortion contraception</kwd><kwd>clergy education</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>family</kwd><kwd>clergy</kwd><kwd>childbearing</kwd><kwd>demography</kwd><kwd>non-abortion contraception</kwd><kwd>clergy education</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>The article was written within the framework of the Project &amp;ldquo;How do young families appear and live in modern Russia? Comparison of secular families and priests&amp;rsquo; families&amp;rdquo;, supported by the PSTGU Development Foundation in 2018-2021.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>&amp;laquo;Natural contraception&amp;raquo;: a permissible measure of condescension or the sin of avoiding childbearing?, Available at: https://priest.today/questions/314 (Accessed 1 May 2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Akerlof, Dzh. and Shiller, R. (2010), How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism, OOO &amp;laquo;Junaited Press&amp;raquo;, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Arkhangelskiy, V. N., Zinkina, Ju. V. and Shulgin, S. G. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Fertility in women with different levels of education: current status and forecast scenarios&amp;rdquo;, Population, (1), 21-38. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Arkhangelskiy, V. N. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Demographic situation in rural areas&amp;rdquo;, O sostoyanii selskih territoriy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2015 godu. Ezhegodny doklad po rezultatam monitoringa, Moscow, 41-60. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Biographical method. Story. Methodology. Practice, ISRAS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Blinova, T. V. (2018), &amp;ldquo;Demographic threats and restrictions on the development of rural areas of Russia&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo universiteta, (2), 14-18. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Goleva, M. A. and Pavlutkin, I. V. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Social networks and fertility&amp;rdquo;, Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, (1), 83-98. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Golovlyanitsyna E. (2007), &amp;ldquo;The role of socio-psychological factors in reproductive desires&amp;rdquo;, in Roditeli i deti, muzhchiny i zhenshhiny v seme i obshhestve, NISP, Moscow, Russia, 217-251. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Davydenko, O. (2013), Dogmatic theology, St. Tikhon&amp;rsquo;s Orthodox University Press, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Dementev, D. V. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Satisfaction with marriage in the families of clergy and laity&amp;rdquo;, State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, (3-4), 227-230. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Elin, A. M. and Pashin, N. P (2019), &amp;ldquo;Problems of demography and ways to solve them in modern Russia&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya, (17), 19-28. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Emelyanov, N. (2019), &amp;ldquo;The significance of the family of an Orthodox priest in pastoral service: a theological approach&amp;rdquo;, St. Tikhon&amp;rsquo;s University Review. Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, (82), 34-50. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Emelyanov, N. (2017), &amp;ldquo;Family life of a priest as an instrument of pastoral service&amp;rdquo;, Report at the pastoral conference &amp;ldquo;Family Life of Clergy&amp;rdquo;, Available at: https://priest.today/news/prot_nikolay_emelianov_semeynaya_zhizn_svyashchennika (Accessed 1 June 2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Zabaev, I. V. (2011), &amp;ldquo;Logic of data analysis in grounded theory: Version of B. Glezer&amp;rdquo;, Sociology: Methodology, Methods and Mathematical Modeling (4M), (32), 124-142. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Zabaev, I. V., Oreshina, D. A. and Pruckova, E. V. (2016), Three Moscow parishes. The main socio-demographic indicators and attitudes of representatives of large parish communities, St. Tikhon&amp;rsquo;s Orthodox University press, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Zabaev, I. V. and Prutskova, E. V. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Social support networks in the Orthodox community. On the example of three large Orthodox parishes of Moscow&amp;rdquo;, Sovremennaya sotsiologiya &amp;ndash; sovremennoy Rossii: Sbornik statey pamyati pervogo dekana fakulteta sotsiologii NIU VShJe</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>A. O. Kryshtanovskogo, Moscow, Russia, 598-608. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Levushkin, A. N. (2018), &amp;ldquo;The application of Christian values in the regulation of marriage and marital relations: history and modernity&amp;rdquo;, Scientific Bulletin of Belgorod State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, (1), 130-136. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Likhacheva, T. N., Korolenko, A. V. and Kalashnikov, K. N. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Demographic forecast of the rural population of the Northwestern Federal District&amp;rdquo;, Problemy razvitiya territorii, (6), 112-131. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Maleva, T. and Sinyavskaya, O. (2006), &amp;ldquo;Socio-economic factors of fertility in Russia: empirical measurements and challenges to social policy&amp;rdquo;, SPERO, (5), 70-97. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Markov, D. A. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Correlation between the level of education and the approach to childbearing in the clergy families of the Russian Orthodox Church&amp;rdquo;, Study of Religion, (3) (in press). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Markov, D. A. (2020), &amp;ldquo;Christian tradition and the problem of procreation in the &amp;ldquo;Structure of theological revolutions&amp;rdquo; M. Massa&amp;rdquo;, Issues of Theology, (6) (in press). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Mitrofanov, G. (2007), &amp;ldquo;Family and marriage issues. Speech at the round table &amp;lsquo;Family in the modern Church&amp;rsquo;&amp;rdquo;, Alfa i Omega, (49), Available at: http://www.icvidnoe.ru/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=28:2009-10-08-14-16-49&amp;amp;catid=22:2009-10-03-20-24-35&amp;amp;Itemid=35 (Accessed 9 April 2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Novoselova, E. N. (2012), &amp;ldquo;Voluntary childlessness as a threat to the demographic security of Russia&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Sociology and Political Science, (1), 99-110. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Fundamentals of the social concept of the Russian Orthodox Church, Available at: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/419128.html (Accessed 12 March 2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Pavlutkin, I. V. and Borisova, O. N. (2019), &amp;ldquo;Variability of models of modern urban large families: a revival of tradition, new marriages or network effects?&amp;rdquo;, Mir Rossii, (4), 128-151. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Roshhina, Ya. M. and Boykov, A. V. (2005), Fertility factors in modern Russia, EERC, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Zabaev, I. V., Emelyanov, N., Pavlenko, E. S. and Pavlutkin, I.&amp;nbsp;V. (2013), Family and childbearing in Russia. Categories of parental consciousness, St. Tikhon&amp;rsquo;s Orthodox University Press, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Strauss, A. and Korbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative research, Translated by Vasileva, T.&amp;nbsp;S., Editorial URSS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Tkachev, A. (2016), Is contraception a sin?, Telecast &amp;ldquo;Briefly about the main thing&amp;rdquo;. Answers to questions, Available at: https://elitsy.ru/communities/35901/926887/ (Accessed 9 April 2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Fot, A. G. (2015), &amp;ldquo;The family of the parish priest of the Orenburg diocese in the context of realizations of everyday life&amp;rdquo;, Magistra Vitae: elektronny zhurnal po istoricheskim naukam i arkheologii, (14), 144-149. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Does a person living in more terrible sins than contraception also have to play it safe in order to enter the Sacraments?, Available at: https://priest.today/questions/36 (Accessed 1 May 2020). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Shmaliy, V. (2002), &amp;ldquo;Field problems in the light of Christian anthropology&amp;rdquo;, Problematika pola v svete khristianskoy antropologii, Materialy Bogoslovskoy konferentsii Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi &amp;laquo;Uchenie Tserkvi o cheloveke&amp;raquo;, 281-320. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Gervais, D. and Gauvreau, D. (2003), &amp;ldquo;Women, priests, and physicians: Family limitation in Quebec, 1940-1970&amp;rdquo;, Journal of interdisciplinary History, 34&amp;nbsp;(2), 293-314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Goodling, R. and Smith, C. (1983), &amp;ldquo;Clergy divorce: a survey of issues and emerging ecclesiastical structures&amp;rdquo;, The Journal of Pastoral Care, XXXVII (4), 271-291.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Hartley, S. F. (1978), &amp;ldquo;Marital satisfaction among clergy wives&amp;rdquo;, Review of Religious Research, 19 (2), 178-191.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Lopez, R. (2020), A History of Family Planning in Twentieth-Century Peru, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>McGregor, P. and McKee, P. (2016), &amp;ldquo;Religion and fertility in Contemporary&amp;rdquo;, European Journal of Population, 32, 599-622.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Morris, M. L. and Blanton, P. W. (1994), &amp;ldquo;Denominational Perceptions of Stress and the Provision of Support Services for Clergy Families&amp;rdquo;, Pastoral Psychology, 42 (5), 345-363.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Norrell, J. E. (1989), &amp;ldquo;Clergy Family Satisfaction&amp;rdquo;, Family Science Review, 2 (4), 337-346.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>Somers, A. and Van Poppel, F. (2003), &amp;ldquo;Catholic priests and the fertility transition among Dutch Catholics, 1935-1970&amp;rdquo;, Annales de d&amp;eacute;mographie historique, 106, 57-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Zabaev, I. (2015), &amp;ldquo;The Economic Ethics of Contemporary Russian Orthodox Christianity: A Weberian Perspective&amp;rdquo;, Journal of Economic Sociology, 16 (4), 148-168.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>