2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-4-0-121828SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIESAssessment of the level of innovative development of regions in the context of spatial interaction problems (based on the “insiders and outsiders” criteria)Assessment of the level of innovative development of regions in the context of spatial interaction problems (based on the “insiders and outsiders” criteria)GuseynovaKsenia E.GuseynovaKsenia E.liksedar@mail.ruInstitute of Sociology, Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, bld. 5, 24/35, Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, 117218, Russia20195400

The article presents the results of a sociological study of the problems of innovative development in 17 subjects of the Russian Federation. The article analyzes the specifics of the terms innovation policy, scientific and technological development in the modern scientific and political discourse. The author considers the specificity of the regional expert community assessment of the level of innovative development in regions with different levels of socio-cultural modernization. The article also assesses the barriers to the implementation of innovative projects based on the analysis of work at the regional level. The methodological feature of the qualitative analysis of the collected material is the application of the concept of division of citizens in the space of innovative social development into “insiders” and “outsiders” groups, developed by the domestic sociologist V. A. Yadov. The article attempts to identify identification criteria for groups “insiders” – “outsiders” (or “others”). To analyze the factors of dichotomous levels that can demonstrate the assessment and current level of innovative development of regions through qualitative data. The article describes dependence of the assessment of the level of innovative development of regions on a variety of factors, whether historical (socio-cultural), economic, natural features, etc. In any case, individuals and various social groups involved in the creation and development of innovative projects are in a kind of “social space” of interested interaction. The mechanisms of their interaction, the levels of communication, the level of modernization-all this is a “social problem” of the implementation of innovation policy.

The article presents the results of a sociological study of the problems of innovative development in 17 subjects of the Russian Federation. The article analyzes the specifics of the terms innovation policy, scientific and technological development in the modern scientific and political discourse. The author considers the specificity of the regional expert community assessment of the level of innovative development in regions with different levels of socio-cultural modernization. The article also assesses the barriers to the implementation of innovative projects based on the analysis of work at the regional level. The methodological feature of the qualitative analysis of the collected material is the application of the concept of division of citizens in the space of innovative social development into “insiders” and “outsiders” groups, developed by the domestic sociologist V. A. Yadov. The article attempts to identify identification criteria for groups “insiders” – “outsiders” (or “others”). To analyze the factors of dichotomous levels that can demonstrate the assessment and current level of innovative development of regions through qualitative data. The article describes dependence of the assessment of the level of innovative development of regions on a variety of factors, whether historical (socio-cultural), economic, natural features, etc. In any case, individuals and various social groups involved in the creation and development of innovative projects are in a kind of “social space” of interested interaction. The mechanisms of their interaction, the levels of communication, the level of modernization-all this is a “social problem” of the implementation of innovation policy.

sociology of managementinnovative development of the regionscientific and technological developmentexpert survey“insiders” and “outsiders”V. A. Yadovsociology of managementinnovative development of the regionscientific and technological developmentexpert survey“insiders” and “outsiders”V. A. YadovСписок литературыAtlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and issues: a collective scientific work (2016), in Lapin, N. I. (ed.), Ves' Mir, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Bauman Z. (1996), Thinking sociologically: a study manual, Translated by Filippova, A. F., Aspekt press, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Guseynova, K. E. (2018), “Breakthrough innovation projects as a solution to the problems of strategic development of the country”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 4 (4), 78-86. (In Russian).Lapin, N. I. (2000), Ways of Russia, IPH RAS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Lapin N. I. (2008), Theory and practice of innovation, Logos, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Lur'e, S. V. (1998), Historical ethnology, Aspect Press, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Forecast of long-term social and economic development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 (2013), [Online], available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_144190/ (Accessed 20 December 2018). (In Russian).Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of socio-cultural modernization of regions (2017), in Tikhonov, A. V. (ed.), FNISTS RAN publ., Mosсow, Russia. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V., Bogdanov, V. S., Merzlyakov, A. A. and Guseynova, K. E. (2018), “The problems of development and implementation of strategic programs of scientific and technological development in the regions of the Russian Federation: socio-organizational barriers (based on remote research in 14 regions of the country with different levels of socio-cultural modernization)”, MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), (3), 380-415, [Online], available at: https://www.mirnayka.com/jour/article/view/841/820 (Accessed 21 November 2018). (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V., Bogdanov, V. S., Merzlyakov, A. A. and Guseynova, K. E. (2019), “The problems of development and implementation of strategic programs of scientific and technological development in the regions of the Russian Federation: socio-organizational barriers. Part 2”, MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), (10), 340-368, [Online], available at: https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/927 (Accessed 10 November 2019). (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V. (2014), “Experience of Sociological and Culturological Research of the Problems of Administrative Vertical Reforming”, Vestnik instituta sotziologii, (10), 66-84. (In Russian).Jadov, V. A. (1995), “The social and socio-psychological mechanisms of social identification”, Mir Rossii, (3-4). (In Russian).Jadov, V. A. (2004), Processes of identification of Russian citizens in the social space of “insiders” and “outsiders”groups and communities (1999-2002), Master class of Professor V. A. Yadov, Aspect Press, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Jadov, V. A. (2005), Social transformations in Russia: theory, practice, comparative analysis, MPSU, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Bauman, Z. (1992), Intimations of Postmodernity, Routledge, London, UK.Bourdieu, P. (1979), La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement, Paris, France.Bourdieu, P. (1984), “Espace social et genese des ‘classes’”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 52.Stompka, P. (1993), The Sociology of Social Change, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.Swartz, D. (1998), Culture & Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.