2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-4-0-81825SOCIAL STRUCTURE, SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND PROCESSESThe characteristics of deviant behavior of Russian youth in the circumstances of changing social realityThe characteristics of deviant behavior of Russian youth in the circumstances of changing social realitySorokinOleg V.SorokinOleg V.ov.sorokin@gmail.comInstitute for Socio-Political Research Federal Center of theoretical and applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences bld. 1, 6 Fotieva St., Moscow, 119333, Russian Federation20195400

The relevance of the problem of studying the characteristics of the deviant behavior of Russian youth has some reasons: a change in the nature of youth integration in the structures of a transition society, on the one hand, and a change in the characteristics of the social reality of this socio-demographic group, on the other. The deviant behavior of youth in classical sociology is considered as a necessary condition for the development of the social system. Based on official statistics, the issues related to the involvement of Russian youth in negative forms of deviation are considered. It is noted, that the highest growth of youth in criminal forms of activity is observed in the transition period of the development of society. From the position of a phenomenological approach, the features of the deviant behavior of Russian youth in a changing social reality are considered. The changing social reality of youth reflects a system of accumulated knowledge and ideas of young people about the conditions of life, expressed in the form of attitudes to values, norms, patterns of behavior, as objects of this reality. This reality regulates the deviant behavior of Russian youth by folding extreme attitudes in the group consciousness, aimed at negating and leveling the values and norms of the general culture and the formation of new meanings of behavior patterns. A significant role in this process is played by youth deviant subcultures, which, in the era of the Internet, strengthen their regulatory function in the virtual space.

The relevance of the problem of studying the characteristics of the deviant behavior of Russian youth has some reasons: a change in the nature of youth integration in the structures of a transition society, on the one hand, and a change in the characteristics of the social reality of this socio-demographic group, on the other. The deviant behavior of youth in classical sociology is considered as a necessary condition for the development of the social system. Based on official statistics, the issues related to the involvement of Russian youth in negative forms of deviation are considered. It is noted, that the highest growth of youth in criminal forms of activity is observed in the transition period of the development of society. From the position of a phenomenological approach, the features of the deviant behavior of Russian youth in a changing social reality are considered. The changing social reality of youth reflects a system of accumulated knowledge and ideas of young people about the conditions of life, expressed in the form of attitudes to values, norms, patterns of behavior, as objects of this reality. This reality regulates the deviant behavior of Russian youth by folding extreme attitudes in the group consciousness, aimed at negating and leveling the values and norms of the general culture and the formation of new meanings of behavior patterns. A significant role in this process is played by youth deviant subcultures, which, in the era of the Internet, strengthen their regulatory function in the virtual space.

youthcharacteristics of the deviant behavior of youthchanging social realityyouthcharacteristics of the deviant behavior of youthchanging social realityСписок литературыDeviance, crime and social control in “the new world”, (2012), Alef-Press, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian).Yermolaeva, M. V. (2008), Development psychology, MODEK, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Lukov, V. A. (2012), Theories of youth. A cross-disciplinary analysis: a monograph, Canon, ROOI “Reabilitaciya”, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).A methodical manual on identification of signs of risk of behavior in social media (2019), AO “Kribrum”, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Pyatnitskaya, I. N. and Shatalov, A. I. (2011), Difficult children are difficult adults, Knorus, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).The Russian science in figures (2018), Higher School of Economics National Research University, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Youth sociology. Encyclopedic dictionary (2008), Academia, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Stepin, V. S. (2011), Civilization and culture, SPbGUP, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian).Chuprov, V. I., Zubok, Yu. A. and Romanovich, N. A. (2019), Trust in self-control of the changing social reality, Norm, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Chuprov V.I. and Zubok, Yu. A. (2009), Youth extremism: essence, forms of manifestation and trend, Academia, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Chuprov, V. I. and Osipova, M. A. (2011) Sociology of management. Theoretical bases, RUDN, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Shendrik, A. I. (2017), Sociology of culture: studies, UNITY-DANA, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Copes, H., Williams, J. P. (2007), “Techniques of affirmation: Deviant Behavior, Moral Commitment, and Subcultural Identity”, Deviant Behavior, (28), 247-272.Gatti, U., Haymoz, S. and Schadee, H. M. (2011), “Deviant Youth Groups in 30 Countries: Results From the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study”, International Criminal Justice Review, (21), 208-224.Gilinskiy, Ya. (2018), “Deviance in the postmodern society”, Power, Violence and Justice Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities, XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada, 15-21 July, 77-28.Harding, D. J. (2011), “Rethinking the Cultural Context of Schooling Decisions in Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: From Deviant Subculture to Cultural Heterogeneity”, Sociology of Education, (84), 322-339.Holt, T. J. (2007), “Subcultural evolution? examining the influence of on- and off-line experiences on deviant subcultures”, Deviant Behavior, (28), 171-198.Kaukinen, C. and Apel, R. (2017), “The Effect of Variation in Intact Family Forms on Deviant and Antisocial Behavior”, American Journal of Criminal Justice, (42), 350-372.Meldrum, R. C. and Clark, J. (2013) “Adolescent Virtual Time Spent Socializing With Peers, Substance Use, and Delinquency”, Crime and Delinquency, (6), 1104-1126.Topalli, V. (2005), “When being Good is bad: an expansion of neutralization theory”, Criminology, (43), 797-836.