2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-3-0-41793SOCIAL STRUCTURE, SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND PROCESSESPlanning a personal future in an unstable social environment and its relationship with status and social activityPlanning a personal future in an unstable social environment and its relationship with status and social activityReutovEvgeny VictorovichReutovEvgeny Victorovichreutovevg@mail.ru20195300

The author diagnoses the “approximation” of the horizon for planning a personal future on the basis of the results of sociological research. Uncertainty about the future is becoming the norm in an unstable social environment. This trend is observed both in global and Russian society, and in the studied regions. The purpose of this article is to identify and describe the specifics of personal future planning by residents of the Russian province and to establish the relationship between the nature of planning and dominant status positions of an individual. The empirical basis of the article is the results of a sociological study conducted in two Russian regions, as well as data from all-Russian surveys. The presence of “long” (for a period of over 5 years) life strategies is noted only in a tenth of the inhabitants of Belgorod and Voronezh regions. It cannot be said that the mass consciousness of the provincial society is permeated with fatalism and passivity. Personal activity and determination with the effective support of the immediate environment are the key factors of social success from the point of view of the majority of respondents. The remoteness or proximity of the planning horizon, the presence or absence of life strategies have only a very small degree of socio-status determination (first of all, age and level of well-being). To a greater extent, they are formed under the influence of socio-psychological factors derived from the specifics of macrosocial dynamics and adaptive practices of the immediate environment. There is a slight positive effect of the desire to plan a personal future on the entrepreneurial attitudes of citizens. Moreover, there is no connection with his attitudes towards labor mobility and social activity. The vast majority of representatives of provincial society do not see the point in “long” life strategies due to the uncertainty of social dynamics and limited social and human capital.

The author diagnoses the “approximation” of the horizon for planning a personal future on the basis of the results of sociological research. Uncertainty about the future is becoming the norm in an unstable social environment. This trend is observed both in global and Russian society, and in the studied regions. The purpose of this article is to identify and describe the specifics of personal future planning by residents of the Russian province and to establish the relationship between the nature of planning and dominant status positions of an individual. The empirical basis of the article is the results of a sociological study conducted in two Russian regions, as well as data from all-Russian surveys. The presence of “long” (for a period of over 5 years) life strategies is noted only in a tenth of the inhabitants of Belgorod and Voronezh regions. It cannot be said that the mass consciousness of the provincial society is permeated with fatalism and passivity. Personal activity and determination with the effective support of the immediate environment are the key factors of social success from the point of view of the majority of respondents. The remoteness or proximity of the planning horizon, the presence or absence of life strategies have only a very small degree of socio-status determination (first of all, age and level of well-being). To a greater extent, they are formed under the influence of socio-psychological factors derived from the specifics of macrosocial dynamics and adaptive practices of the immediate environment. There is a slight positive effect of the desire to plan a personal future on the entrepreneurial attitudes of citizens. Moreover, there is no connection with his attitudes towards labor mobility and social activity. The vast majority of representatives of provincial society do not see the point in “long” life strategies due to the uncertainty of social dynamics and limited social and human capital.

personal futureplanning horizonlife strategieslabor mobilitysocial activitypersonal futureplanning horizonlife strategieslabor mobilitysocial activity

Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке гранта РФФИ «Ментальные неравенства как фактор социальной поляризации российской провинции» № 18-011-00474.

Список литературыBarabanova, V. V. and Zelenova, M. E. (2002), “Students' vision of the future as an aspect of their personal and professional self-determination”, Psychological Science and Education, (2), 28-41. (In Russian).Bauman, Z. (2005), The Individualized Society, Translated by Inozemtsev, V. L., Logos, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Bek, U. (2000), Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity, Translated by Sedel'nik, V and Fyodorova, N., Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Burd'e P. (2002), “The forms of capital”, Journal of Economic Sociology, (5), 60-74. [Online], available at: http://bourdieu.name/node/106 (Accessed 15 August 2019). (In Russian).Darendorf, R. (2002), Modern social conflict. Freedom Policy Essay, Translated by Pantina, L. Yu., ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Kravchenko, S. A. (2017), “Metamorphoses: essence, more complex types, place in sociological knowledge”, Sociological Studies, (10), 3-14. (In Russian).Naumova, N. F. (1995) “Human life strategy in a transitional society”, Sociological Journal, (2), 5-22. (In Russian).Nemirovskiy, V. G., Nemirovskaya, A. V. (2018), “Social Competitiveness: Youth and Adult Opportunities for Success”, Sociological Journal, (2), 135-149. (In Russian).Tikhonova, N. E. (2000), “Russian middle class: worldview features and factors of social mobility”, Sociological Studies, (3), 13-23. (In Russian).Cherednichenko, G. A. (2001), “Personal plans of secondary school graduates (comparative analysis)”, Sociological Studies, (12), 108-115. (In Russian).Cherednichenko, G. A. (2005), “Personal High School Graduate Plans”, Sociological Studies, (7), 114-117. (In Russian).Yanitskiy, O. N. (2011), “«Turbulent times» as a problem of a risk society”, Social Sciences and Contemporary World, (6), 155-164. (In Russian).Bauman, Z. (2017), Retrotopia, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Dahrendorf, R. (1979), Life Chances: Approaches to Social and Political Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1987), The End of Organized Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Nurmi, J.-E. (1991), “How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning”, Developmental Review, 11 (1), 1-59.Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, J. and Banich, M. (2009), “Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting”, Child Development, 80 (1), 28-44.Urry, J. (1987), Global Complexity, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.