2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-1-0-31661SOCIAL STRUCTURE, SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND PROCESSESAttitude of different generations of the population of Tatarstan to extremism as a factor in reducing interfaith tensionAttitude of different generations of the population of Tatarstan to extremism as a factor in reducing interfaith tensionBelyaevVladimir AlexandrovichBelyaevVladimir Alexandrovichkai@kai.ruMingazovaAliya M.MingazovaAliya M.kai@kai.ru20195100

The article analyzes the prevalence of radical and extremist beliefs and attitudes in the field of interfaith relations among representatives of different generations. For this, a mass survey was conducted, which showed that most respondents, the residents of the Republic of Tatarstan, did not understand the phenomenon of extremism and the measures to prevent its manifestation. Russians more often identify opposition and extremism, and Tatars are more aware of the possibility of non-extremist opposition. The difference in the positions of Tatars and Russians, in our opinion, is generated by the long-term propaganda of the Tatarstan authorities of the historical nature of the statehood of the Tatars. The inability of the population to single out the specifics of extremism indicates both to inadequate law enforcement practice and flaws in the work of the media and above all characteristic of older generations of respondents. The survey has revealed the absence of a developed understanding in the younger generation, which by its nature is prone to maximalism and “black and white” perception of social reality. It has also revealed  the respondents’ attitude to the main directions of state policy in confessional relations that can minimize or increase inter-religious tensions. The social activity of different generations of respondents in the area of participation in mass protests was evaluated. Radical, and even more extremist views are categorically rejected by all generations of the Republic of Tatarstan population, which allows maintaining interfaith stability in the region. It is significant that among the older generations that were formed in the USSR, the views on the distancing of religion from the state do not depend on the political situation. Obviously, the older generation does not accept new forms of disseminating views (via the Internet), while young respondents, on the contrary, prefer mass street actions. At the same time, a narrow segment of predominantly young people is able to turn into a mobilization base for the transmission of extreme convictions and radical actions. Information for citation: Belyaev, V. A. and Mingazova, Al. M. (2019), “Attitude of different generations of the population of Tatarstan to extremism as a factor in reducing interfaith tension”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 5 (1), 25-38, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-1-0-3

The article analyzes the prevalence of radical and extremist beliefs and attitudes in the field of interfaith relations among representatives of different generations. For this, a mass survey was conducted, which showed that most respondents, the residents of the Republic of Tatarstan, did not understand the phenomenon of extremism and the measures to prevent its manifestation. Russians more often identify opposition and extremism, and Tatars are more aware of the possibility of non-extremist opposition. The difference in the positions of Tatars and Russians, in our opinion, is generated by the long-term propaganda of the Tatarstan authorities of the historical nature of the statehood of the Tatars. The inability of the population to single out the specifics of extremism indicates both to inadequate law enforcement practice and flaws in the work of the media and above all characteristic of older generations of respondents. The survey has revealed the absence of a developed understanding in the younger generation, which by its nature is prone to maximalism and “black and white” perception of social reality. It has also revealed  the respondents’ attitude to the main directions of state policy in confessional relations that can minimize or increase inter-religious tensions. The social activity of different generations of respondents in the area of participation in mass protests was evaluated. Radical, and even more extremist views are categorically rejected by all generations of the Republic of Tatarstan population, which allows maintaining interfaith stability in the region. It is significant that among the older generations that were formed in the USSR, the views on the distancing of religion from the state do not depend on the political situation. Obviously, the older generation does not accept new forms of disseminating views (via the Internet), while young respondents, on the contrary, prefer mass street actions. At the same time, a narrow segment of predominantly young people is able to turn into a mobilization base for the transmission of extreme convictions and radical actions. Information for citation: Belyaev, V. A. and Mingazova, Al. M. (2019), “Attitude of different generations of the population of Tatarstan to extremism as a factor in reducing interfaith tension”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 5 (1), 25-38, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-1-0-3

extremismradicalismterrorisminter-confessional tensiongeneration of "stagnation" and a generation of "reforms"political absenteeismpolitical indifferenceextremismradicalismterrorisminter-confessional tensiongeneration of "stagnation" and a generation of "reforms"political absenteeismpolitical indifference

Статья подготовлена при поддержке Российского Фонда фундаментальных исследований (РФФИ) в рамках научного проекта № 17-06-00474 «Динамика реальных и условных поколений в информационном, полиэтноконфессиональном обществе (на материале Республики Татарстан)».

Список литературыBaal, N. B. (2012), “Political extremism of Russian youth and technologies of its overcoming”, Abstract of D. Sc. Dissertation, N. Novgorod, Russia. (In Russian).Belyaev, V. A. (2018), “Evolution of terrorism and extremism in the Republic of Tatarstan”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 4 (2), 3-12. (In Russian).Belyaev, V. A. and Mingazova, A. M. (2017), “Postmodern and Pseudo-Religious Simulacra of Intergenerational Relations as a Source of Reproduction of Social Orphanhood”, Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii, (4), 178-186. (In Russian).Grachev S. I., Sorokin M. N. and Azimov R. A. (2015), Terrorism: concepts, ideology, problems of counteraction, Institute of FSB of Russia, N. Novgorod, Russia. (In Russian).Kosov, G. V. and Panin, V. N. (2014), Politicization of the religious factor in the context of regional security: the North Caucasian projection, Mirakl`, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Levada, Yu. A. (2005), “Generations of the Twentieth Century: Research Opportunities”, in Fathers and Children: Generation Analysis of Modern Russia, New literary review, Moscow, Russia, 43-44. (In Russian).Mingazova, A. M. and Belyaev, V. A. (2017), “Types of Ethno-Confessional Identity and Tolerance among Students”, Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii, (4), 287-291. (In Russian).Mukhametshin, F. Kh. (1993), “Introductory remarks”, Federalism – global and Russian dimensions. International scientific and practical conference, Kazan', Russia, 13. (In Russian).Petrishchev, V. E. (2013), What is terrorism, or Introduction to Terrorism, KRASAND, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Tushkova, Yu. V. (2018), “State policy on countermeasures to extremism in Great Britain”, Ph.D. Thesis, Kazan, Russia. (In Russian).Christmann, K. (2012), Preventing Religious Radicalization and Violent Extremism. A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence, Youth Justice Board for England and Wales, Huddersfield, UK.Coolsaet, R. (2012), Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalization Challenge: European and American Experiences, 2nd еdition, Ashgate Publishing Company, Serrey, UK.Kumar, D. (2012), Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, Haymarket Books, Chicago, USA.Mannheim, K. (1952), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, Routledge & Kegan Paul, N.Y., USA.Maximova, O., Belyaev, V. and Mingazova, A. (2018), “Generational Features of Ethnic Personal Identification in a Multi-Ethnic Society”, Astra Salvensis, 6, 443-451.Maximova, O., Belyaev, V., Laukart-Gorbacheva, O. (2017), “Transformation of The System of Bilingual Education in The Republic of Tatarstan: Crossover Ethnolinguistic Controversies”, Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8 (2), 15-38.Pickering, R. (2014), “Terrorism, extremism, radicalization and the offender management system in England and Wales in Prisons”, in Silke, A. (ed.) Terrorism and Extremism: Critical Issues in Management, Radicalization and Reform, Routledge, London-N.Y., UK-USA.Posluszna, E. (2015), Environmental and Animal Rights Extremism, Terrorism, and National Security, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.Schmid, A. (2014), Violent and Non-Violent Extremism: Two Sides of the Same Coin?, ICCT, Hague, Netherlands.Thomas, P. (2012), Responding to the Threat of Violent Extremism. Failing to Prevent, Bloomsbury Academic, London, UK.Trilling, D. (2012), Bloody Nasty People: The Rise of Britain's Far Right, Verso Books, London-N.Y., UK-USA.