<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9338</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Sociology and Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9338</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9338-2015-1-4-8-17</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">164</article-id><title-group><article-title>RISK ENVIRONMENT AS SOCIAL REALITY CHANGE FACTOR: THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL REGULATION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>RISK ENVIRONMENT AS SOCIAL REALITY CHANGE FACTOR: THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL REGULATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Zubok</surname><given-names>Yu. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zubok</surname><given-names>Yu. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>uzubok@mail.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Chuprov</surname><given-names>V. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chuprov</surname><given-names>V. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>chuprov443@yandex.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/sociology/2015/4/soc2.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article explains the theoretical concept of modern environment study transformation based on risk approach. The risks occurring in the environment are conceptualized as the environmental and the activity phenomenon appearing during the transition from certainty to uncertainty and vice versa. The dialectical relationship of uncertainty and non-linearity is argued in changing social reality of modern risk society. The problems of risk social regulation in a changing reality.
Reflecting in the construction of own social reality by people, in the formation of ideas about it, the risks are mediated by the subjective interpretation of environmental conditions and are manifested in the interpretation of its phenomena, endowed with subjective senses, and in activity motivation during the interaction with risk environment. Risk environment as the changing social reality is only partly the determination of objective reality, but mostly becomes a culturally constructed phenomenon, the product of human relationships. Phenomenological paradigm acts as the theoretical and methodological source of its justification.
The change in the mechanism of social regulation within the new social reality, the weakening of its institutional aspects and strengthening of self-regulation aspects is substantiated. The processes of symbolization, simulation and performance are revealed in the risk self-regulation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article explains the theoretical concept of modern environment study transformation based on risk approach. The risks occurring in the environment are conceptualized as the environmental and the activity phenomenon appearing during the transition from certainty to uncertainty and vice versa. The dialectical relationship of uncertainty and non-linearity is argued in changing social reality of modern risk society. The problems of risk social regulation in a changing reality.
Reflecting in the construction of own social reality by people, in the formation of ideas about it, the risks are mediated by the subjective interpretation of environmental conditions and are manifested in the interpretation of its phenomena, endowed with subjective senses, and in activity motivation during the interaction with risk environment. Risk environment as the changing social reality is only partly the determination of objective reality, but mostly becomes a culturally constructed phenomenon, the product of human relationships. Phenomenological paradigm acts as the theoretical and methodological source of its justification.
The change in the mechanism of social regulation within the new social reality, the weakening of its institutional aspects and strengthening of self-regulation aspects is substantiated. The processes of symbolization, simulation and performance are revealed in the risk self-regulation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>risk</kwd><kwd>risk environment</kwd><kwd>uncertainty</kwd><kwd>non-linearity</kwd><kwd>changing social reality</kwd><kwd>social regulation and the self-regulation of risk</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>risk</kwd><kwd>risk environment</kwd><kwd>uncertainty</kwd><kwd>non-linearity</kwd><kwd>changing social reality</kwd><kwd>social regulation and the self-regulation of risk</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. Beck, U. Risk Society. On the way to another modernity. M.: Progress-Tradition, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2. Ionin L.G. Sociology of culture: the way to new millennium: Textbook for students. - 3rd ed., rev. and add. M.: Logos, 2000. URL: http://sociology2015.ru/index/0-23 (date of appeal: 04/11/2015)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3. Perrow Ch. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New Brunswick. N.J .: Rutgers University Press, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4. Perrow Ch. The Next Catastrophe: Reducing our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton University Press. 2011. VII.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5. Kravchenko S.A. Sociology: the paradigm through the prism of sociological imagination: textbook for high schools. M.: Publishing House &amp;quot;Examen&amp;quot;, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6. Kara-Murza S. Manipulation of consciousness. Moscow, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7. G. Lubbe. Moving with the time. On the reduction of our stay in the present // Problems of philosophy. 1994. №4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8. E. Fromm. The anatomy of human destructiveness. M.: AST-LTD, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9. Bauman Z. The changing present. SPb.: Peter, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>10. Prigogine I. The End of Certainty. New York: Free Press, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>11. Kravchenko S.A. &amp;quot;Normal anomie&amp;quot;: the contours of the concept // Sociological researches. 2014. №8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>12. Spirkin A.G. The basics of philosophy: Textbook for high schools. M.: Politizdat, 1988..</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>13. Wave processes in social development. Novosibirsk, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>14. Prigogine, Stengers I. Time, chaos, quantum. M., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>15. Heisenberg V. Physics and philosophy: Part and the whole. M., 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>16. Algin A.P. Risk and its role in public life. M., 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>17. A.I. Prigogine. Modern sociology of organizations. M., 1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>18. T.I. Zaslavskaya. Post-socialist transformation process in Russia // Bulletin of the Russian Humanitarian Foundation. 1998. №3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>19. V.V. Lokosov Russian society: transformation of objectives, interests and values. M.: RIC ISPR RAS, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>20. Russia: risks and dangers of the &amp;quot;transition&amp;quot; society / Chief ed. O.N. Yanitsky M.: Institute of sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>21. Y.A. Zubok. The phenomenon of risk in sociology: Youth study experience. M.: Mysl, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>22. Royal Society. Risk: analysis, perception and management. London: Royal Society, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>23. A. Schutz. The formation of concepts and theories in social sciences. From the book &amp;quot;American sociological thought&amp;quot;. M., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>24. Wildavsky A. and Drake K. Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? Daedalus. Special issue on risk. 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>25. Kravchenko S.A. Nonlinearity // Sociological Encyclopedic Russian-English dictionary. M.: Astrel - Ast Tranzitkniga, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>26. Chuprov V.I., Zubok Y.A. Social regulation under uncertainty. Methodological features of youth study. M.: Academia, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>27. Beck U. Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes // The Risk Society and Beyond / B. Adam, U. Beck, J. van Loon (eds.). L .: Sage Publication, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>28. Mentality // Sociological encyclopedia: 2 v. V. 1 / The head of scientific project G.U. Semigin; Ch. Ed. V.N. Ivanov. M.: Mysl, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>29. Gurevich A.Y. From the history of mentalities to historical synthesis // The debates about the main thing: discussions about the present and the future of history around the French school of &amp;quot;Annals&amp;quot;. M., 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>30. O.G. Usenko. To the definition of &amp;quot;mentality&amp;quot; concept // Russian history: the problems of mentality. M., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>31. Minyushev F.I. Sociology of culture. M: Academic Project, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>