2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-71586SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIESBreakthrough innovation projects as a solution to the problems of strategic development of the countryBreakthrough innovation projects as a solution to the problems of strategic development of the countryGuseynovaKsenia E.GuseynovaKsenia E.liksedar@mail.ruInstitute of Sociology, Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, bld. 5, 24/35, Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, 117218, Russia20184400

The article presents the results of a sociological research conducted to identify organizational and socio-cultural barriers to innovation projects. The article analyzes the use of the terms "innovation", "innovative project", both in science and in the practice of developing Federal programs. The emphasis is on the scientific novelty of innovative projects. It is argued that the implementation of national projects requires sociological support. As an example, the author presents the results of the study of organizational and technical barriers on the basis of a remote analysis of the official websites of the authorities and management of 14 subjects of the Russian Federation, grouped by the level of their sociocultural modernization from the highest to the lowest, on the basis of a technique of IPH RAS (N.I. Lapin).  It is concluded that innovative activity is a complex multi-level process, which includes a number of mandatory procedures, and socio-cultural innovations, in turn, clearly demonstrate the mechanisms of translation of cultural and scientific experience from the individual to the collective level. Information for citation: Guseynova, K. E. (2018), “Breakthrough innovation projects as a solution to the problems of strategic development of the country”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 4 (4), 78-86, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-7 

The article presents the results of a sociological research conducted to identify organizational and socio-cultural barriers to innovation projects. The article analyzes the use of the terms "innovation", "innovative project", both in science and in the practice of developing Federal programs. The emphasis is on the scientific novelty of innovative projects. It is argued that the implementation of national projects requires sociological support. As an example, the author presents the results of the study of organizational and technical barriers on the basis of a remote analysis of the official websites of the authorities and management of 14 subjects of the Russian Federation, grouped by the level of their sociocultural modernization from the highest to the lowest, on the basis of a technique of IPH RAS (N.I. Lapin).  It is concluded that innovative activity is a complex multi-level process, which includes a number of mandatory procedures, and socio-cultural innovations, in turn, clearly demonstrate the mechanisms of translation of cultural and scientific experience from the individual to the collective level. Information for citation: Guseynova, K. E. (2018), “Breakthrough innovation projects as a solution to the problems of strategic development of the country”, Research Result. Sociology and management, 4 (4), 78-86, DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-7 

innovationsbreakthrough technologiesinnovative projectsKurchatov Instituteconvergence of technologiesactors of innovationssociocultural innovationssociocultural modernizationinnovationsbreakthrough technologiesinnovative projectsKurchatov Instituteconvergence of technologiesactors of innovationssociocultural innovationssociocultural modernizationСписок литературыAgzamov, R. Z. (2014), “Social competence in the subject field of sociology of management”, Abstract of PhD dissertation, Modern Humanitarian Academy, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Atlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and issues: a collective scientific work (2016), in Lapin, N. I. (ed.), Ves' Mir, Moscow, Russia, 360. (In Russian).The competitiveness of domestic IT-companies (2012), INAB 1, Institute of Sociology of RAS, Moscow, Russia, [Online], available at: http://www.isras.ru/inab_2012_01 (Accessed 13 November 2017). (In Russian).Science cities are in a crisis situation (2012), INAB 2, Institute of Sociology of RAS, Moscow, Russia, [Online], available at: http://www.isras.ru/inab_2012_02.html (Accessed 19 November 2017). (In Russian).Koval'chuk, M. (2011), “Convergence of science and technology – a breakthrough in the future”, Rossiyskie nanotekhnologii, (1-2), 13-23. (In Russian).Lektorskiy, V. A., Pruzhinin, B. I., Alekseeva, I. Y., Arshinov, V. I., Gorokhov, V. G., Dubrovskiy, D. I., Kiyashchenko, L. P. and Tishchenko, P. D. (2013), “Convergence of biological, information, nano- and cognitive technologies: a philosophy challenge”, Voprosy filosofii, (12), 17-26. (In Russian).Lapin, N. I. (2008), Theory and practice of innovation: Unoversity book, Logos, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Matyuh, E. (2012), “Theory of "risk society" in modern Humanities”, Filosofskie nauki, (7), 33-37. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V., Bogdanov, V. S., Merzlyakov, A. A. and Guseynova, K. E. (2018), “Problems of development and implementation of strategic programs of scientific and technological development in the regions of the Russian Federation: socio-organizational barriers (based on remote research in 14 regions of the country with different levels of socio-cultural modernization)”, MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), (3), 380-415, [Online], available at: https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/841/820 (Accessed 21 November 2018). (In Russian).Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of socio-cultural modernization of regions (2017), in Tikhonov, A. V. (ed.), FNISTS RAN publ., Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V. (2007), Sociology of management: Theoretical foundations, Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Bainbridge, M. and Roco, M. (2005), Managing nano-bio infocogno innovations: converging technologies in society, Springer.Choices, Values, and Frames (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Lefebvre, V. A. and Sanabria, F. (2008), “Matching by Fixing and Sampling: A Local Model Based on Internality”, Behavioral Processes, 78, 204-209.Roco, M., Mirkin, C. and Hersam, M. (2011), Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Retrospective and Outlook, NSF/WTEC report, Springer.Rorty, R. (1980), Philosophy and the mirror of nature, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Schummer, J. (2008), “From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: «The best way to predict the future is to create it»”, in Maasen S., Kaiser M., Kurath M. & Rehmann-Sutter Ch. (eds.) Deliberating Future Technologies: Identity, Ethics, and Governance of Nanotechnology, Springer.Sztompka, P. (2009), “One Sociology or Many?” The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions, 21-29.Umpleby, Stuart A. (2014), “Second order science: logic, strategies, methods”, Constructivist Foundations, 10 (1), 16-23.