2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2017-3-4-35-501292SOCIAL STRUCTURE, SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND PROCESSESSOCIOCULTURAL (CIVILIZATIONAL) AND INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONALITY OF THE FEEDBACK TECHNOLOGY IN WORK OF THE ELEMENTS POWER-MANAGEMENT VERTICALSOCIOCULTURAL (CIVILIZATIONAL) AND INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONALITY OF THE FEEDBACK TECHNOLOGY IN WORK OF THE ELEMENTS POWER-MANAGEMENT VERTICALBogdanovVladimir S.BogdanovVladimir S.valarf@mail.ruGuseynovaKsenia E.GuseynovaKsenia E.liksedar@mail.ruPochestnevAleksandr A.PochestnevAleksandr A.apochestnev@yandex.ruИнститут социологии Федеральный научно-исследовательский социологический центр Российской академии наук; Московский авиационный институт (национальный исследовательский университет)»Institute of Sociology, Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, bld. 5, 24/35 Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, 117218, RussiaInstitute of Sociology, Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, bld. 5, 24/35, Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, 117218, Russia20173400

This article provides domestic and global experience in implementing e-government projects and research practices in the study. There were analyzed the main criteria of an explication of structural and functional elements of e-Government projects, fixed reference points, social and technological barriers, and also possible tendencies trends in the transition to e-participation and governance (e-participation and e-Governance). It is asked whether there are in fact elements and flexible forms of regulation in modern information society or there is only imitation? There are considered the specifics of domestic structure of the power-management vertical’s organization and its purpose in the context of crystallization and integration of the institutional – regulatory components of sociocultural modernization of the country and regions. One of the basic criteria for the launch of sociocultural modernization should become goal-rational and communicative technologies on the organization of feedback principles of the authorities and management with the public (stakeholders). The reader is invited to discuss the problems and prospects which are contradicting and slowing down the implementation of goal-rational communicative technologies in domestic practice of functioning of the power-management vertical (PMV), and also to consider the possibility of entering the theoretical-methodological level of reasoning for the development and implementation of the methodology of studying the PMV phenomenon and also the possibility of use of rational-informative procedures for a feedback phenomenon explication in a domestic control system.

This article provides domestic and global experience in implementing e-government projects and research practices in the study. There were analyzed the main criteria of an explication of structural and functional elements of e-Government projects, fixed reference points, social and technological barriers, and also possible tendencies trends in the transition to e-participation and governance (e-participation and e-Governance). It is asked whether there are in fact elements and flexible forms of regulation in modern information society or there is only imitation? There are considered the specifics of domestic structure of the power-management vertical’s organization and its purpose in the context of crystallization and integration of the institutional – regulatory components of sociocultural modernization of the country and regions. One of the basic criteria for the launch of sociocultural modernization should become goal-rational and communicative technologies on the organization of feedback principles of the authorities and management with the public (stakeholders). The reader is invited to discuss the problems and prospects which are contradicting and slowing down the implementation of goal-rational communicative technologies in domestic practice of functioning of the power-management vertical (PMV), and also to consider the possibility of entering the theoretical-methodological level of reasoning for the development and implementation of the methodology of studying the PMV phenomenon and also the possibility of use of rational-informative procedures for a feedback phenomenon explication in a domestic control system.

electronic government (e-Government)electronic control (e-Governance)electronic democracy (e-democracy)electronic participation of the population (e-participation)information technologies (informational technologies)big dataawarenessfeedbackdigital governmentelectronic democracyelectronic government (e-Government)electronic control (e-Governance)electronic democracy (e-democracy)electronic participation of the population (e-participation)information technologies (informational technologies)big dataawarenessfeedbackdigital governmentelectronic democracyСписок литературыAnaliticheskie doklady. Institut mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy MGIMO (U) MID Rossii [The analytical reports. Institute of international studies MGIMO (University) MFA Russia] (2013), MGIMO, 1 (36), Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Atlas modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov: sotsioekonomicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye tendentsii i problemy: kollektivnyy nauchnyy trud [Atlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and issues: collective scientific work] (2016), in Lapin, N. I. (ed.), Ves' Mir, Moscow, Russia, 360. (In Russian).Belousov, A. (2007), “The Genesis and transformation of a political metaphor”, Svobodnaya mysl', 6 (1577), 23-36. (In Russian).Bogdanov, V. S. (2017), Elektronnoe upravlenie v obshchestve: sotsial'nye  i poznavatel'nye problemy: monografiya [E-governance in society: social and cognitive problems] in Tikhonov, A. V. (ed.), Universitetskaya kniga, Moscow, Russia, 320. (In Russian).Byzov, L. G., Petukhov, V. V. (2016), Vlast' i obshchestvo: mezhdu konsolidatsiey i nedovol'stvom.  Rossiyskoe obshchestvo i vyzovy vremeni. Kniga tret'ya [Power and society: between consolidation and dissatisfaction. Russian society and the challenges of time. The 3rd book], in Gorshkov, M. K., Tikhonova, N. E. (ed.), Ves' Mir, Moscow, Russia, 109-129. (In Russian).Voloshinskaya, A. A. (2016), “Electronic participation in Russia: new instrument of interaction between the state and society or e-Potemkin village”, Informacionnoe obshhestvo, 1, 40-47.Giddens, E. (2015) Nespokoynyy i mogushchestvennyy kontinent: chto zhdet Evropu v budushchem? [Turbulent and mighty continent: what awaits Europe in the future?], Translated by Delo, Moscow, Russia, 238. (In Russian).Dridze, T. M. (1995), “A human in the urban space: the social and communicative mechanisms and social participation in shaping the urban environment”, Mir psikhologii i psikhologiya v mire, 4 (5), 20-27. (In Russian).Zhavoronkov, A. V. (2007), Rossiyskoe  obshchestvo: potreblenie, kommunikatsiya i prinyatie resheniy, 1967-2004 [Russian society: consumption, communication, and decision-making, 1967-2004], Vershina, Moscow, Russia, 569. (In Russian).Konkurentosposob,nost' otechestvennykh IT-kompaniy (po materialam interaktivnogo issledovaniya) [The competitiveness of domestic it companies] (2012), INAB 1 [Electronic], Institute of Sociology RAS. (In Russian).Naukogrady v krizisnoy situatsii (po materialam interaktivnogo issledovaniya) [Science cities are in a crisis situation] (2012), INAB 2 [Electronic], Institute of Sociology RAS. (In Russian).Information society in the CIS countries: analysis of information society development in the participating States of the CIS the priority areas of the Plan of action of the world summit on the information society (2016), Astana, available at: http://www.zerde.gov.kz/upload/iblock/9d6/bookrussian.pdf (Accessed 19 November 2011). (In Russian).Rossiya: reformirovanie vlastno-upravlencheskoy vertikali v kontekste problem sotsiokul'turnoy modernizatsii regionov [Russia: reform of the power-management vertical in the context of sociocultural modernization of regions], (2017), in Tikhonov, A. V. (ed.), FNISC RAS, Moscow, Russia, 546. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V. (2007), Sotsiologiya upravleniya [Sociology of management], «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», Moscow, Russia, 472. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V. (2014), “The experience of sociological and cultural studies of the problems of reforming the power-management vertical”, Vestnik Instituta Sotziologii, 10, 66-84. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V., Bogdanov, V. S. and Guseynova, K. E. (2017) “Civil Online Examination of the Work of Regional Management Systems in the Context of Socio-Cultural Modernization Processes in the Region”, Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, 1, 101-123. (In Russian).Chebotareva, A. A. “Mechanisms of e-democracy: opportunities and problems of their realization in the Russian Federation”, The scientific center of legal information under the Ministry of justice of the Russian [Online], available at:  http://www.scli.ru/periodicals/%D0%92%D1%8B%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BA%203-2012/12_%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0.pdf (Accessed: 19 November 2017). (In Russian).Shcherbina, V. V. (2016), “Goal-forming and goal- rationalizing social technologies”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, 4, 50-58. (In Russian).Bakardjieva, M. (2009), “Subactivism: lifeworld and politics in the age of the internet”, The Information Society. Taylor and Francis, 25 (2), 91-104.Bell, D. (1978), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, Basic Books, N.Y., USA, 507.Castells, M. (2004), The Power of Identity. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2-ed., 584.Cegarra-Navarroa, J. G., Cуrdoba Pachуn, J. R. and Cegarra, J. L. (2012), “E-government and citizen’s engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities”, International Journal of Information Management, 32, 469-478.Clarke, A. (2010), Social media: 4. Political uses and implications for representative democracy, Library of Parlament, Ottawa, Canada.Сl DEMO_net: Demo_net Deliverable 5.1: Report on current ICTs to enable participation in Thorleifsdottir A., Wimmer, M. (ed.), DEMO-netConsortium, 2006.Clift, S. E-Governance to E-Democracy: Progress in Australia and New Zealand toward Information-Age Democracy [Online], available at:  http://www.publicus.net/articles/aunzedem.html (Accessed: 24 November 2017).Davies, R. (2015), e-Government: Using technology to improve public services and democratic participation, European Parliamentary Research Service.Gao, J. (2012) “How Does Chinese Local Government Respond to Citizen Satisfaction Surveys? A Case Study of Foshan City”, The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71 (2), 136-147.Hai and Ibrahim, J. C. (2007), Fundamental of Development Administration, Scholar Press, Selangor.Hung, M. J. (2012) “Building Citizen-centred E-government in Taiwan: Problems and Prospects”, The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71 (2), 246-255.Jho, W., Song, K. J. (2015), Institutional and technological determinants of civil e – рarticipation: Solo or duet?, Government Information Quarterly, 32, 488-495.Katchanovski, I., Porte, T. (2005), “Cyberdemocracy or Potemkin E-Villages? Electronic Governments in OECD and Post-Communist Countries”, International Journal of Public Administration, 68, 665-681.Komito, L. (2007), “Community and inclusion: The impact of new communications technologies”, Irish Journal of Sociology, 16 (2), 77-96.Kreiss, D. (2015), “The Problem of Citizens: E-Democracy for Actually Existing Democracy”, Social Media + Society, 1-11.Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I., Borning, A., McDonald, D. W. and Zachry, M. (2009), Designing Mediating Spaces Between Citizens and Government, Socially Mediating Technologies Workshop at the ACM 2009 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09).Kuo, N-L. (2012), “Citizen Dissatisfaction Leads to Budget Cuts, or Not: A Case Study of a Local Taiwanese Government”, The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71 (2), 159-166.Lash, S. (2002), Critique of Information, Sage Publications, London, UK.Leighninger, M. (2014), “Citizenship And Governance In A Wild, Wired World: How Should Citizens And Public Managers Use Online Tools To Improve Democracy?”, National Civic Review, 20-29.Lendra, C., Palvia1, J. and Sharma, S. S. (2003), “E-Government and E-Governance: Definitions. Domain Framework and Status around the World”, Foundations of E-government. Computer Society of India. Retrieved [Online], available at: URL: http://www.iceg.net/2007/books/1/1_369.pdf (Accessed: 24 November 2017).Macintosh, A. (2004), “Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making”, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Track 5, Hawaii, USA, 1-10.Masuda, Y. (1983), The Information Society as Postindustrial Society, World Future Soc., Wash., USA.Mckenna, A. (2011), Human Right to Participate in the Information Society, Hampton Press, New York, USA.Pautz, H. (2010), The Internet, Political Participation and Election Turnout, German Politics & Society, 28 (3), 156-175.Reddick, C. G. (2005), “Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?”, Government Information Quaterly, 22, 38-57.Shailendra, C., Palvia1, J. and Sharma, S. S. “E-Government and E-Governance: Definitions. Domain Framework and Status around the World”, Foundations of E-government. Computer Society of India. Retrieved [Online], available at: URL: http://www.iceg.net/2007/books/1/1_369.pdf (Accessed: 24 November 2017).Shai, P. M. (1990), The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Tundjungsari, V., Istiyanto, J. E., Winarko, E. and Wardoyo, R. (2011), “E-Participation Modeling and Developing with Trust for Decision Making Supplement Purpose”, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3 (5), 55-62.United Nation E-government Survey 2014. E-Government for the Future We Want [Online], available at: URL: http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2014-Survey/E-Gov_Complete_Survey-2014.pdf (Accessed: 24 November 2017).