2408-9338Research result. Sociology and Management2408-933810.18413/2408-9338-2017-3-4-29-341291SOCIAL STRUCTURE, SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND PROCESSESANALYSIS OF THE MEASUREMENT OF SCIENTIFIC NOVELTY IN THE ABSTRACTS OF MASTER’S THESESANALYSIS OF THE MEASUREMENT OF SCIENTIFIC NOVELTY IN THE ABSTRACTS OF MASTER’S THESESGuseynovaKsenia E.GuseynovaKsenia E.liksedar@mail.ruInstitute of Sociology, Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, bld. 5, 24/35, Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, 117218, Russia20173400

This article provides the problem of measurement and use of such concept as «scientific novelty». The specifics of scientific and practical relevance in the subject field of sociology of management are also being examined. It is argued that the degree and depth of its theoretical and methodological bases are directly dependent on the quality and actual level of knowledge, which are claimed by the authors of the theses. Despite the increased number of publications on the mentioned discipline, the unwillingness of scientists to get acquainted with creativity of the colleagues remains the main problem. This fact, in turn, demonstrates a direct distortion in the operationalization of key concepts and terms. It can also negatively affect the studied object as the problems and the purposes of many works submitted on thesis defense, are not included in the subject field of the sociology of management. The research results show that by means of the qualitative analysis it is possible to reveal and typify the main methodological spelling errors of candidate theses.

This article provides the problem of measurement and use of such concept as «scientific novelty». The specifics of scientific and practical relevance in the subject field of sociology of management are also being examined. It is argued that the degree and depth of its theoretical and methodological bases are directly dependent on the quality and actual level of knowledge, which are claimed by the authors of the theses. Despite the increased number of publications on the mentioned discipline, the unwillingness of scientists to get acquainted with creativity of the colleagues remains the main problem. This fact, in turn, demonstrates a direct distortion in the operationalization of key concepts and terms. It can also negatively affect the studied object as the problems and the purposes of many works submitted on thesis defense, are not included in the subject field of the sociology of management. The research results show that by means of the qualitative analysis it is possible to reveal and typify the main methodological spelling errors of candidate theses.

sociology of managementscientific novelty of the dissertationabstractsociology of managementscientific novelty of the dissertationabstractСписок литературыBelotserkovskiy, A. V. (2012), “Russian higher education: the challenges and risks”, Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 7, 3-9. (In Russian).Gorshkov, M. K. and Sheregi, F. E. (2012), Prikladnaya sotsiologiya: metodologiya i metodyi [Applied sociology: methodology and methods], FGANU «Tsentr sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy», Institute of sociology RAS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Grazhdan, V. D. (2011), Sotsiologiya upravleniya [Sociology of management], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Zborovskiy, G. E. and Ambarova, P. A. (2016), “Transformation of an object field of governance and administration sociology: new challenges”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, 7, 48-57. (In Russian).Klement'ev, D. S. (2010), Sotsiologiya upravleniya [Sociology of management], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Proshanov, S. L. (2011), “Doctoral dissertations on sociology (1990-2010) ”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, 1, 30-39. (In Russian).Social'noe obosnovanie strategij gorodskogo, regional'nogo i korporativnogo razvitija: problemy i metody issledovanij [Social justification of policies urban, regional and corporate development: problems and methods of research] (2010), Proc. IXth of Dridzevskikh readings, IS RAS, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Sotsiologiya upravleniya: Teoretiko-prikladnoy tolkovyiy slovar, [Sociology of management: Theoretical and applied dictionary] (2015), Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V., Merzlyakov, A. A. and Bogdanov, V. S. (2016), “Experience in Modernizing Educational Technologies Based on the Innovative Practices of Scientific Research Activities”, Vestnik Instituta Sotziologii, 16, 110-122. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V. and Merzlyakov, A. A. (2014), “Systematization of methodological approaches and results of empirical researches in the field of management in economic disciplines”, Sbornik materialov XXII mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii "Novye perspektivy razvitiya ekonomicheskikh nauk: innovatsii i riski" [Proc. XXIInd of the International conference "New prospects of economic Sciences: innovation and risks"], Part 4, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Tikhonov, A. V. (2013), “Philosophical foundations of management problems: essays”, Russian Journal of Philosophical Science. (In Russian).Shtompka, P. (2005), Sotsiologiya. Analiz sovremennyih obschestv [Sociology. Analysis of modern societies], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Lapin, N. I. (2006), Obschaya sotsiologiya [General sociology], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).Shcherbina, V. V. (2016), “Rationalizing social technologies”, Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov. Seriâ Sociologiâ, 16 (1), 141-162. (In Russian).Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A. and Yahia, M. (2011), Education: The PhD factory, Nature, (472), 276-279.Egghe, L. (2002), “Rousseau. A proposal to define a core of a scientific subt: A definition using concentration and fuzzy sets”, Scientometrics, 54 (1), 53-55.Taylor, M. (2011), Reform The PhD System of Close It Down, Nature, (472).Zbierowski, P. (2017), “The Aspirations of New Technology-Based Firms in CEE and CIS Countries?”, Foresight and STI Governance, 11 (3), 50-60.